Article Sidebar

Download
Download Article

Main Article Content

Abstract

This study examines the impact of absorptive capacity on supply chain innovation performance through supply chain agility in a manufacturing company in Bogor. Employing a quantitative approach, data were collected from 216 respondents via questionnaires and analyzed using Structural Equation Modeling (SEM) with AMOS. The results indicate that absorptive capacity positively influences supply chain agility (p-value = 0.000) but does not directly affect supply chain innovation performance (p-value = 0.318). Furthermore, supply chain agility also does not significantly affect innovation performance (p-value = 0.292). The study concludes that enhancing absorptive capacity can improve supply chain agility but does not necessarily translate into improved innovation performance. To address this, the company is advised to strengthen interdepartmental communication and optimize knowledge utilization in decision-making to enhance agility and innovation within the supply chain.

Keywords

Absortive Capacity Supply Chain Agility Supply Chain Innovation Performance Supply Chain

Article Details

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

How to Cite
Dewanti, S. A., & Santosa, W. (2025). The Effect of Absorptive Capacity on Supply Chain Innovation Performance Through Supply Chain Agility in Manufacturing Companies in Bogor, Indonesia. Golden Ratio of Marketing and Applied Psychology of Business, 5(2), 414–425. https://doi.org/10.52970/grmapb.v5i2.983
Download Citation
Endnote/Zotero/Mendeley (RIS)
BibTeX

References

  1. Agarwal, A., Shankar, R., & Tiwari, M. (2006). Modeling agility of supply chain. Industrial Marketing Management (Vol. 36, Issue 4, p. 443). Elsevier BV. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.indmarman.2005.12.004
  2. Barve, A., Kanda, A., & Shankar, R. (2008). The role of human factors in agile supply chains. European J of Industrial Engineering (Vol. 3, Issue 1, p. 2). Inderscience Publishers. https://doi.org/10.1504/ejie.2009.021582
  3. Cohen, W. M., & Levinthal, D. A. (1990). Absorptive Capacity: A New Perspective on Learning and Innovation.
  4. Davis, J., Edgar, T. F., Graybill, R., Korambath, P., Schott, B., Swink, D., Wang, J., & Wetzel, J. (2015). Smart Manufacturing [Review of Smart Manufacturing]. Annual Review of Chemical and Biomolecular Engineering, 6(1), 141. Annual Reviews. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-chembioeng-061114-123255
  5. Du, Y., Hu, X., & Vakil, K. (2021). Systematic literature review on the supply chain agility for manufacturer and consumer. International Journal of Consumer Studies (Vol. 45, Issue 4, p. 581). Wiley. https://doi.org/10.1111/ijcs.12645
  6. FAUR, M., & Bungău, C. (2019). Outsourcing Towards Greater Agility Through Investigating Decoupling Points in Leagile Supply Chains. MATEC Web of Conferences (Vol. 290, p. 7006). EDP Sciences. https://doi.org/10.1051/matecconf/201929007006
  7. Griffin, R. W., & Ebert, R. J. (2015). Business Essentials (10th ed.). Pearson.
  8. Gunasekaran, A., Yusuf, Y., Adeleye, E. O., Παπαδόπουλος, Θ., Kovvuri, D., & Geyi, D. G. (2018). Agile manufacturing: an evolutionary review of practices. International Journal of Production Research (Vol. 57, p. 5154). Taylor & Francis. https://doi.org/10.1080/00207543.2018.1530478
  9. Gyarmathy, A., Peszynski, K., & Young, L. (2020). Theoretical Framework for a Local, Agile Supply Chain to Create Innovative Product Closer to End-user: Onshore-Offshore Debate. Operations and Supply Chain Management An International Journal (p. 108). https://doi.org/10.31387/oscm0410256
  10. Hair, J. F., et al. (2019). Multivariate Data Analysis. Cengage Learning.
  11. Heizer, J., Render, B., & Munson, C. (2020). O P E R AT I O N S Sustainability and Supply Chain Management (13th ed.).
  12. Lambert, D. M., & Cooper, M. C. (2014). Supply Chain Management: Processes, Partnerships, Performance (4th ed.). Pearson.
  13. Liu, D., Yu, X., Huang, M., Yang, S., Isa, S. M., & Hu, M. (2022). The Effects of Green Intellectual Capital on Green Innovation: A Green Supply Chain Integration Perspective. Frontiers in Psychology (Vol. 13). Frontiers Media. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2022.830716
  14. Moosivand, A., Ghatari, A. R., & Rasekh, H. R. (2019). Supply Chain Challenges in Pharmaceutical Manufacturing Companies: Using Qualitative System Dynamics Methodology. PubMed, 18(2), 1103. https://doi.org/10.22037/ijpr.2019.2389
  15. Nagati, H., & Rebolledo, C. (2013). Fostering Innovation through Customer Relationships. Supply Chain Forum an International Journal, 14(3), 16. https://doi.org/10.1080/16258312.2013.11517318
  16. Opoku, E., Okafor, M., Williams, M., Aribigbola, A., & Olaleye, A. (2024). Enhancing small and medium-sized businesses through digitalization. World Journal of Advanced Research and Reviews, 23(2), 222. https://doi.org/10.30574/wjarr.2024.23.2.2313
  17. Park, E. M., & Park, S. T. (2015). The Effectiveness of Absorptive Capacity Formation Mechanism on Innovation Performance by Industry. In Indian Journal of Science and Technology (Vol. 8, Issue 21). Indian Society for Education and Environment. https://doi.org/10.17485/ijst/2015/v8i21/83351
  18. Safinaz, et al. (2023). Role of Absorptive Capacity, Digital Capability, Agility, and Resilience in Supply Chain Innovation Performance.
  19. Sekaran, U., & Bougie, R. (2013). Research Methods for Business: A Skill-Building Approach
  20. Shekarian, M., Nooraie, S. V., & Parast, M. M. (2019). Examining the impact of flexibility and agility on mitigating supply chain disruptions. International Journal of Production Economics (Vol. 220, p. 107438). Elsevier BV. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijpe.2019.07.011
  21. Sugiyono. (2017). Metode Penelitian Kuantitatif, Kualitatif, dan R&D. Alfabeta Supply Chain Management Institute.
  22. Zahra, S. A., & George, G. (2002). Absorptive Capacity: A Review, Reconceptualization, and Extension. Academy of Management Review, 27(2), 185-203.