Article Sidebar

Download
Download Article

Main Article Content

Abstract

This study aims to determine the effect of product selling price on profitability at PT. Semen Bosowa in Maros Distric regency which is descriptive and comparative with the entire population of data in the form of income statements and production data at PT. Semen Bosowa in Maros Disctric Regency. Sampling was carried out by means of positive sampling in order to obtain a sample of the income statement and production data for the years 2015-2019. Data were analyzed using simple linear regression analysis, correlation coefficient and t test. The result of regression analysis shows that Ŷ = 0.204 - 0.020X. This equation means that the constant value of 0.204 is the amount of profitability achieved regardless of the level of the selling price. The regression coefficient value is -0.020 which means that if the selling price increases by 1 percent, it will cause a decrease in the value of profitability at PT. Semen Bosowa in Maros district regency of 0.020. This explains the direction of the negative coefficient between selling price and profitability, namely when the selling price increases it will cause a decrease in profitability. This means that the selling price has an effect but not significantly on profitability.

Keywords

Selling Prices Profitability R&D Cost Statistical Analytic

Article Details

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

How to Cite
Niar, H. (2022). Examining Linkage of Product Selling Prices on Profitability. Golden Ratio of Marketing and Applied Psychology of Business, 2(1), 12–25. https://doi.org/10.52970/grmapb.v2i1.82
Download Citation
Endnote/Zotero/Mendeley (RIS)
BibTeX

References

  1. Adams, D., Donovan, J., & Topple, C. (2021). Achieving sustainability in food manufacturing operations and their supply chains: Key insights from a systematic literature review. Sustainable Production and Consumption, 28, 1491–1499. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.spc.2021.08.019
  2. Albanesi, S., Olivetti, C., & Prados, M. J. (2015). Gender and Dynamic Agency: Theory and Evidence on the Compensation of Top Executives . In Gender in the Labor Market (Vol. 42, pp. 1–59). Emerald Group Publishing Limited. https://doi.org/10.1108/S0147-912120150000042001
  3. Albulescu, C. T., Drăghici, A., & Tăucean, I. M. (2018). Firms’ Financial Performance and Investment: A Panel Data Analysis Applied to the Wine Industry of CEE Countries. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 238, 714–719. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2018.04.054
  4. Behera, R. K., Gunasekaran, A., Gupta, S., Kamboj, S., & Bala, P. K. (2020). Personalized digital marketing recommender engine. Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, 53, 101799. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jretconser.2019.03.026
  5. Brad, L., Munteanu, A., & Brasoveanu, I. V. (2015). Measuring the Performance of Romanian Listed Companies Considering their Individual Characteristics. Procedia Economics and Finance, 32, 1225–1235. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/S2212-5671(15)01500-2
  6. Cox, B. L., & Mutel, C. L. (2018). The environmental and cost performance of current and future motorcycles. Applied Energy, 212, 1013–1024. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apenergy.2017.12.100
  7. Eniola, A. A., & Entebang, H. (2015). SME Firm Performance-Financial Innovation and Challenges. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 195, 334–342. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2015.06.361
  8. Francoeur, C., Lakhal, F., Gaaya, S., & Ben Saad, I. (2021). How do powerful CEOs influence corporate environmental performance? Economic Modelling, 94, 121–129. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.econmod.2020.09.024
  9. Ghozali, I. (2013). Aplikasi Analisis Multivariate Dengan Program IBM dan SPSS. In aplikasi analisis multivariate dengan program ibm spss 19 (p. 113). https://doi.org/10.2307/1579941
  10. Guan, Z., Ye, T., & Yin, R. (2020). Channel coordination under Nash bargaining fairness concerns in differential games of goodwill accumulation. European Journal of Operational Research, 285(3), 916–930. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejor.2020.02.028
  11. Holm, M., & Ax, C. (2020). The interactive effect of competition intensity and customer service competition on customer accounting sophistication—Evidence of positive and negative associations. Management Accounting Research, 46, 100644. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mar.2019.07.001
  12. Irfan, M., Hao, Y., Panjwani, M. K., Khan, D., Chandio, A. A., & Li, H. (2020). Competitive assessment of South Asia’s wind power industry: SWOT analysis and value chain combined model. Energy Strategy Reviews, 32, 100540. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.esr.2020.100540
  13. Järvinen, J., & Taiminen, H. (2016). Harnessing marketing automation for B2B content marketing. Industrial Marketing Management, 54, 164–175. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.indmarman.2015.07.002
  14. Jin, X., Lei, G., & Yu, J. (2016). Government governance, executive networks and enterprise R&D Expenditure. China Journal of Accounting Research, 9(1), 59–81. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cjar.2015.09.001
  15. Johannessen, J., & Skålsvik, H. (2013). The systemic leaders: new leaders in the global economy. Kybernetes, 42(1), 13–34. https://doi.org/10.1108/03684921311295457
  16. Kotler, P. (2012). Marketing management/Philip Kotler, Kevin Lane Keller. Pearson Education Limited, 817, 1.
  17. Maqbool, S., & Zameer, M. N. (2018). Corporate social responsibility and financial performance: An empirical analysis of Indian banks. Future Business Journal, 4(1), 84–93. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fbj.2017.12.002
  18. Newton, S. K., Gilinsky, A., & Jordan, D. (2015). Differentiation strategies and winery financial performance: An empirical investigation. Wine Economics and Policy, 4(2), 88–97. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wep.2015.10.001
  19. Notta, O., & Vlachvei, A. (2014). The Impact of Financial Crisis on Firm Performance in Case of Greek Food Manufacturing Firms. Procedia Economics and Finance, 14, 454–460. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/S2212-5671(14)00734-5
  20. Olarewaju, O. M., & Msomi, T. S. (2021). Intellectual capital and financial performance of South African development community’s general insurance companies. Heliyon, 7(4), e06712. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2021.e06712
  21. Ozcelik, H. (2020). An Analysis of Fraudulent Financial Reporting Using the Fraud Diamond Theory Perspective: An Empirical Study on the Manufacturing Sector Companies Listed on the Borsa Istanbul. In S. Grima, E. Boztepe, & P. J. Baldacchino (Eds.), Contemporary Issues in Audit Management and Forensic Accounting (Vol. 102, pp. 131–153). Emerald Publishing Limited. https://doi.org/10.1108/S1569-375920200000102012
  22. Pan, X., Li, M., Guo, S., & Pu, C. (2020). Research on the competitive effect of local government’s environmental expenditure in China. Science of The Total Environment, 718, 137238. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.137238
  23. Pryce, D., Memon, F. A., & Kapelan, Z. (2021). Life cycle analysis approach to comparing environmental impacts of alternative materials used in the construction of small wastewater treatment plants. Environmental Advances, 4, 100065. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envadv.2021.100065
  24. Ramsbottom, G., Horan, B., Berry, D. P., & Roche, J. R. (2015). Factors associated with the financial performance of spring-calving, pasture-based dairy farms. Journal of Dairy Science, 98(5), 3526–3540. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.3168/jds.2014-8516
  25. Rūtelionė, A., Šeinauskienė, B., Nikou, S., Lekavičienė, R., & Antinienė, D. (2022). Emotional intelligence and materialism: the mediating effect of subjective well-being. Journal of Consumer Marketing, ahead-of-p(ahead-of-print). https://doi.org/10.1108/JCM-01-2021-4386
  26. Shaverdi, M., Heshmati, M. R., & Ramezani, I. (2014). Application of Fuzzy AHP Approach for Financial Performance Evaluation of Iranian Petrochemical Sector. Procedia Computer Science, 31, 995–1004. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procs.2014.05.352
  27. Shim, E. D., & Kim, E. (2015). An Empirical Examination of the Relationship between Top Executive Compensation and Firm Performance in the Post Sarbanes-Oxley Period. In Advances in Management Accounting (Vol. 25, pp. 207–228). Emerald Group Publishing Limited. https://doi.org/10.1108/S1474-787120150000025007
  28. Silva Gutiérrez, D., Paz, M. J., & Moreno Vite, A. (2021). Factors that explain the results of the national oil companies: The impact of the fiscal role on Pemex’s results. Resources Policy, 74, 102280. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resourpol.2021.102280
  29. Xing, Y., Liu, Y., & Lattemann, C. (2020). Institutional logics and social enterprises: Entry mode choices of foreign hospitals in China. Journal of World Business, 55(5), 100974. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jwb.2018.11.004
  30. Yagi, M., & Kokubu, K. (2018). Corporate material flow management in Thailand: The way to material flow cost accounting. Journal of Cleaner Production, 198, 763–775. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.07.007