Article Sidebar

Download
Download Article

Main Article Content

Abstract

This study investigates the strategic integration of service innovation and brand extension within the operational frameworks of medical schemes. It aims to explore how these dual strategies can enhance competitiveness, improve service quality, and strengthen brand equity in the dynamic healthcare sector. In innovation and brand extension within medical schemes, introducing Efficiency Discount Options (EDOs) represents a departure from traditional parent benefit options, offering equivalent benefits through a distinct healthcare delivery model. This unintended consequence underscores how these pricing strategies and innovative service models can reshape consumer preferences towards more cost-effective healthcare alternatives, impacting market dynamics and demographic segmentation within the healthcare sector. This research employs a qualitative approach, focusing on in-depth case studies of medical schemes that have successfully integrated service innovation and brand extension. A comprehensive literature review complements the empirical data, providing theoretical insights into innovation and brand management strategies in the healthcare context. The study reveals that integrating service innovation and brand extension creates synergies that enhance operational effectiveness and member satisfaction, reinforcing market positioning and adaptability to evolving consumer demands. EDOs within medical schemes have inadvertently skewed beneficiary demographics toward younger age groups, showcasing how pricing strategies and innovative service models influence consumer preferences for cost-effective healthcare options. These findings underscore the strategic impact of brand extension on market dynamics and demographic segmentation in the healthcare sector, highlighting evolving consumer preferences and the competitive landscape shaped by innovative pricing and service strategies. This research contributes to the academic discourse by providing actionable insights into the effective integration of service innovation and brand extension within medical schemes. It highlights practical implications for schemes looking to optimise service administration strategies and strengthen their competitive edge in the healthcare sector. The findings also underscore the importance of aligning innovation initiatives with brand management practices to foster sustained growth and enhance service quality.

Keywords

Service Innovation Brand Extension Market Strategy Customer Perception Business Growth

Article Details

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

How to Cite
Willie, M. (2026). The Thin Line Between Service Innovation and Brand Extension. Golden Ratio of Marketing and Applied Psychology of Business, 6(2), 581–593. https://doi.org/10.52970/grmapb.v6i2.652
Download Citation
Endnote/Zotero/Mendeley (RIS)
BibTeX

References

  1. Aaker, D. A. (1991). Managing brand equity: Capitalising on the value of a brand name. New York: The Free Press.
  2. Aaker, D.A. (1996). Building strong brands. New York: Free Press.
  3. Chesbrough, H. (2011). Open services innovation: Rethinking your business to grow and compete in a new era. Jossey-Bass.
  4. Christensen, C. (2013). The Innovator's Dilemma: When new technologies cause great firms to fail. Brighton, MA: Harvard Business Review Press.
  5. Christensen, J. K., Varnes, C. J., Hollensen, B., & Blomberg, B. C. (2009). Co-constructing the brand and the product. International Journal of Innovation Management, 13(3), 319-348. https://doi.org/10.1142/S1363919609002327
  6. Council for Medical Schemes. (2006). Findings and recommendations of the governance theme. Retrieved from https://www.medicalschemes.com/files/Presentations%20And%20Reports/FINAL%20GOVERNANCE%20REPORT%20APRIL%202006%20_3_%20_3_.pdf
  7. Council for Medical Schemes. (2022). Industry report 2022. Retrieved from https://www.medicalschemes.com/reports/2022
  8. Farhana, M. (2012). Brand elements lead to brand equity: Differentiate or die. Information Management and Business Review, 4(4), 223-233. https://doi.org/10.22610/imbr.v4i4.983
  9. Hasan, A., Khan, M. A., Rehman, K. ur, & Sobia, W. (2009). Consumer's trust in the brand: Can it be built through brand reputation, brand competence, and brand predictability? International Business Research, 3(1), 43-51. https://doi.org/10.5539/ibr.v3n1p43
  10. Keller, K. L. (1993). Conceptualising, measuring, and managing customer-based brand equity. Journal of Marketing, 57(1), 1-22.
  11. Keller, K. L. (2003). Understanding brands, branding, and brand equity. Interactive Marketing, 5(1), 7-20. https://doi.org/10.1057/palgrave.im.4340213
  12. Loken, B., & John, D. R. (1993). Diluting brand beliefs: When do brand extensions have a negative impact? Journal of Marketing, 57(3), 71-84.
  13. Lye, A., Venkateswarlu, P., & Barrett, J. (2000). Brand Extensions: Prestige brand effects. Australasian Marketing Journal (AMJ), 9(2), 53-65. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1441-3582(01)70175-9
  14. Maharani, A. S., Hidayat, A., & Hidayat, A. (2023). The influence of brand innovativeness and quality affect consumer perceived value: The role of symbolic brand qualities as mediating. International Journal of Research in Business and Social Science, 12(4), 15-32.
  15. Pattuglia, S., Mingione, M., & Cherubini, S. (2015). Achieving alignment for corporate brand success: The consumer quest for authenticity and heritage. In Proceedings of the International Marketing Trends Conference 2015. Paris.
  16. Rastogi, P. (2012). Effect of brand extensions on parent brand. Global Journal of Management and Business Studies, 1(1), 29-33. https://doi.org/10.2319/2319-7285.1.1.29
  17. SI JIA, C. (2012). The analysis of challenges and opportunities in brand extension. DiVA portal. Retrieved from https://www.diva-portal.org/fulltext01
  18. Snyder, H. (2019). Literature review as a research methodology: An overview and guidelines. Journal of Business Research, 104(C), 333-339. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2019.07.039
  19. Varadarajan, R., DeFanti, M., & Busch, P. S. (2006). Brand portfolio, corporate image, and reputation: Managing brand deletions. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 34(2), 195-205. https://doi.org/10.1177/0092070305284988
  20. Vargo, S. L., & Lusch, R. F. (2004). Evolving to a new dominant logic for marketing. Journal of Marketing, 68(1), 1-17.
  21. Xu, Z. (2014). The challenges of brand innovation in different positioning strategies to classify the Haier and its subbrands to avoid market cannibalisation. DiVA portal. Retrieved from https://www.diva-portal.org/get/FULLTEXT01
  22. Mahavarpour, N., Marvi, R., & Foroudi, P. (2023). A Brief History of Service Innovation: The evolution of past, present, and future of service innovation. Journal of Business Research, 160, 113795. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2023.113795
  23. Brandwell. (2024, February 15). Brand extension strategies: Everything you need to know.[online]. Available at: https://brandwell.com.au/brand-extension-strategies-everything-you-need-to-know/
  24. Sedighi, M., Sheikh, A., Tourani, N., & Bagheri, R. (2022). Service delivery and branding management in digital platforms: Innovation through brand extension. Human Behavior and Emerging Technologies, 4(3), Article e7159749. https://doi.org/10.1155/2022/7159749
  25. Markides, C. (2006). Disruptive Innovation: In Need of Better Theory. Journal of Product Innovation Management, 23(1), 19–25. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-5885.2005.00177.x
  26. Christensen, C. (2013). The Innovator’s Dilemma: When New Technologies Cause Great Firms to Fail. Brighton, MA: Harvard Business Review Press.
  27. Rashid, Y., Rashid, A., Warraich, M. A., Sabir, S. S., & Waseem, A. (2019). Case Study Method: A Step-by-Step Guide for Business Researchers. International Journal of Qualitative Methods. https://doi.org/10.1177/1609406919862424
  28. Christensen, C.M., McDonald, R., Altman, E.J. and Palmer, J.E. (2018), “Disruptive innovation: an intellectual history and directions for future research”, Journal of Management Studies, Vol. 55 No. 7, pp. 1043-1078, doi: 10.1111/joms.12349.
  29. Taherdoost, H. (2021). Data collection methods and tools for research; A step-by-step guide to choose data collection technique for academic and business research projects. International Journal of Academic Research in Management (IJARM), 10(1), 10-38. https://hal.science/hal-03741847
  30. Medical Schemes Act 131 of 1998. (1998). Republic of South Africa. Retrieved from https://www.gov.za/documents/medical-schemes-act
  31. Mohajan, H. (2018). Qualitative research methodology in social sciences and related subjects. Munich Personal RePEc Archive. Retrieved from https://mpra.ub.uni-muenchen.de/85654/1/MPRA_paper_85654.pdf
  32. Crowe, S., Cresswell, K., Robertson, A., Huby, G., Avery, A., & Sheikh, A. (2011). The case study approach. BMC Medical Research Methodology, 11, 100. https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2288-11-100