Main Article Content

Abstract





This study aims to analyze the influence of customer emotional value and service innovation variables on consumer purchase decisions using the Technology Acceptance Model (TAM) theory approach. This study uses a quantitative approach and uses primary data from questionnaires and secondary data. The sample in this study were 231 people spread across various provinces in Indonesia using an unlimited population. Data analysis was performed using validity test, reliability test, R-squared test, F-squared test, direct effect test, and Partial Least Square (PLS) hypothesis submission. The results show that the Technology Acceptance Model (TAM) has a positive and significant effect on Emotional Value and Service Innovation, as well as on Consumer Purchase Decisions through the mediation of Emotional Value and Service Innovation. However, the Technology Acceptance Model (TAM) does not have a positive and significant effect on Consumer Purchase Decisions directly.





Keywords

TAM Service Innovation Emotional Value Purchase Decision Technology Acceptance Model

Article Details

Author Biographies

Dedi Juniansyah, Universitas Muslim Indonesia, Makassar

 

 

Sabri Hasan, Universitas Muslim Indonesia, Makassar

 

 

Aditya Halim Perdana Kusuma Putra, Universitas Muslim Indonesia, Makassar

 

 

How to Cite
Juniansyah, D., Hasan, S., & Putra, A. H. P. K. (2023). The Role of Consumer Emotional Value, and Service Innovation on Consumer Purchase Decisions: TAM Theory Approach. Golden Ratio of Marketing and Applied Psychology of Business, 3(1), 52–65. https://doi.org/10.52970/grmapb.v3i1.170

References

  1. Armstrong, G., Adam, S., Denize, S., & Kotler, P. (2014). Principles of marketing. Pearson Australia.
  2. Auvinen, E., Huhtala, M., Kinnunen, U., Tsupari, H., & Feldt, T. (2020). Leader motivation as a building block for sustainable leader careers: The relationship between leadership motivation profiles and leader and follower outcomes. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 120, 103428. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jvb.2020.103428
  3. Azizah, F. D., Nur, A. N., & Putra, A. H. P. K. (2022). Impulsive Buying Behavior: Implementation of IT on Technology Acceptance Model on E-Commerce Purchase Decisions. Golden Ratio of Marketing and Applied Psychology of Business, 2(1), 58–72. https://doi.org/10.52970/grmapb.v2i1.173
  4. Bastari, A., Eliyana, A., Syabarrudin, A., Arief, Z., & Emur, A. P. (2020). Digitalization in banking sector: the role of intrinsic motivation. Heliyon, 6(12), e05801. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2020.e05801
  5. Chatterjee, S., & Kumar Kar, A. (2020). Why do small and medium enterprises use social media marketing and what is the impact: Empirical insights from India. International Journal of Information Management, 53, 102103. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2020.102103
  6. Chin, W. (1998). The partial least squares approach to structural equation modeling. Modern Methods for Business Research, 295(2), 295–336. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aap.2008.12.010
  7. Daniel, P.-M. (2016). The use of customer-centric philosophy in hotels to improve customer loyalty. Journal of Business & Industrial Marketing, 31(3), 339–348. https://doi.org/10.1108/JBIM-05-2013-0110
  8. Davis, F. D. (1989). Perceived Usefulness, Perceived Ease of Use, and User Acceptance of Information Technology. MIS Quarterly, 13(3), 319. https://doi.org/10.2307/249008
  9. Fang, S. R., Chang, E., Ou, C. C., & Chou, C. H. (2014). Internal market orientation, market capabilities and learning orientation. European Journal of Marketing, 48(1), 170–192. https://doi.org/10.1108/EJM-06-2010-0353
  10. Farida, I., & Ardiansyah, W. (2022). Technology Acceptance Model Factors: Implications on Digital-Wallet on Interest to Buy in Franchise Business. Golden Ratio of Marketing and Applied Psychology of Business, 2(2), 147–157. https://doi.org/10.52970/grmapb.v2i2.139
  11. Gartner, J., Fink, M., & Maresch, D. (2022). The Role of Fear of Missing Out and Experience in the Formation of SME Decision Makers’ Intentions to Adopt New Manufacturing Technologies. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 180, 121723. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2022.121723
  12. Hadi Putra, P. O., & Santoso, H. B. (2020). Contextual factors and performance impact of e-business use in Indonesian small and medium enterprises (SMEs). Heliyon, 6(3), e03568. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2020.e03568
  13. Hyson, P. (2013). The spirited leader: the potential of spiritual intelligence to improve leadership. The International Journal of Leadership in Public Services, 9(3/4), 109–115. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJLPS-10-2013-0028
  14. Jaakson, K., Tamm, D., & Hämmal, G. (2011). Organisational innovativeness in Estonian biotechnology organisations. Baltic Journal of Management, 6(2), 205–226. https://doi.org/10.1108/17465261111131811
  15. Javaid, M., Haleem, A., Pratap Singh, R., & Suman, R. (2021). Significance of Quality 4.0 towards comprehensive enhancement in manufacturing sector. Sensors International, 2, 100109. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sintl.2021.100109
  16. Joseph F. Hair, Jr., G.Tomas M. Hult, Christian M. Ringle, M. S. rstedt. (2013). A Primer on Partial Least Squares Structural Equation Modeling. In Long Range Planning (Vol. 46, Issues 1–2). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lrp.2013.01.002
  17. Juniansyah, D., Putra, A. H. P. K., Syahnur, H., Hasan, S., & Nujum, S. (2022). Symmetrical and Asymmetrical of TAM: Consumer Emotional Value and Service Innovation on Consumer Purchase Decisions. Golden Ratio of Mapping Idea and Literature Format, 2(1), 8–35. https://doi.org/10.52970/grmilf.v2i1.133
  18. Kartika, T., Firdaus, A., & Najib, M. (2020). Contrasting the drivers of customer loyalty; financing and depositor customer, single and dual customer, in Indonesian Islamic bank. Journal of Islamic Marketing, 11(4), 933–959. https://doi.org/10.1108/JIMA-04-2017-0040
  19. Lajante, M., Ladhari, R., & Massa, E. (2022). Role of affective forecasting in customers’ hotel service experiences. International Journal of Contemporary Hospitality Management, 34(3), 1062–1083. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJCHM-04-2021-0530
  20. Lestari, S. D., Leon, F. M., Widyastuti, S., Brabo, N. A., & Putra, A. H. P. K. (2020). Antecedents and Consequences of Innovation and Business Strategy on Performance and Competitive Advantage of SMEs. The Journal of Asian Finance, Economics and Business, 7(6), 365–378. https://doi.org/10.13106/jafeb.2020.vol7.no6.365
  21. Mishra, P. K., Parey, A., Saha, B., Samaddar, A., Chakraborty, S., Kaviraj, A., Nielsen, I., & Saha, S. (2022). Production analysis of composite fish culture in drought prone areas of Purulia: The implication of financial constraint. Aquaculture, 548, 737629. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aquaculture.2021.737629
  22. Muñoz-Leiva, F., Rodríguez López, M. E., Liebana-Cabanillas, F., & Moro, S. (2021). Past, present, and future research on self-service merchandising: a co-word and text mining approach. European Journal of Marketing, 55(8), 2269–2307. https://doi.org/10.1108/EJM-02-2019-0179
  23. Ņikitina, T., Lapiņa, I., Ozoliņš, M., Irbe, M. M., Priem, M., Smits, M., Nemilentsev, M., Kajol, K., Singh, R., Paul, J., Ho, K. L. P., Quang, H. T., Miles, M. P., Spaltini, M., Acerbi, F., Pinzone, M., Gusmeroli, S., Taisch, M., Ahmad, F., … Mishra, S. (2022). Information communication technology and financial inclusion of innovative entrepreneurs. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 8(4), 1003–1011. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2021.120650
  24. Nugraha, D. P., Setiawan, B., Nathan, R. J., & Fekete-Farkas, M. (2022). Fintech Adoption Drivers for Innovation for SMEs in Indonesia. Journal of Open Innovation: Technology, Market, and Complexity, 8(4), 208. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.3390/joitmc8040208
  25. Nurlina, N., & Putra, A. H. P. K. (2022). The Symmetrical and Asymmetrical Relationship of Technology Acceptance Model (TAM) on Consumer Emotional Value, and Service Innovation in Supporting Consumer Purchase Decisions. International Journal of Artificial Intelligence Research, 6(1). https://doi.org/10.29099/ijair.v6i1.421
  26. Patil, V., Ghosh, R., Kathuria, V., & Farrell, K. N. (2020). Money, Land or self-employment? Understanding preference heterogeneity in landowners’ choices for compensation under land acquisition in India. Land Use Policy, 97, 104802. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landusepol.2020.104802
  27. Robalo, P., & Sayag, R. (2018). Paying is believing: The effect of costly information on Bayesian updating. Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, 156, 114–125. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jebo.2018.09.016
  28. Smith, S., & Paladino, A. (2010). Eating clean and green? Investigating consumer motivations towards the purchase of organic food. Australasian Marketing Journal, 18(2), 93–104. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ausmj.2010.01.001
  29. Vernuccio, M., Pagani, M., Barbarossa, C., & Pastore, A. (2015). Antecedents of brand love in online network-based communities. A social identity perspective. Journal of Product and Brand Management, 24(7), 706–719. https://doi.org/10.1108/JPBM-12-2014-0772
  30. Zubair, M., Wang, X., Iqbal, S., Awais, M., & Wang, R. (2020). Attentional and emotional brain response to message framing in context of green marketing. Heliyon, 6(9), e04912. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2020.e04912