Article Sidebar

Download
Download Article

Main Article Content

Abstract

This study examines the optimization of legal awareness and critical thinking skills through trial simulations (moot courts) among Pancasila and Citizenship Education (PPKn) students at STKIP Pasundan Cimahi. Using a case study method, this study aims to evaluate how the implementation of moot courts can improve students' legal understanding and critical thinking skills in the context of legal education. The case study method is applied by observing and analyzing student participation in moot court activities. Data were collected through direct observation, interviews, and questionnaires involving students and lecturers. The main focus of this study was to identify changes in legal awareness, level of involvement, and development of critical thinking skills before and after participating in trial simulations. The results showed that participation in moot courts significantly increased students' legal awareness and encouraged the development of critical thinking skills. Students showed a better understanding of legal principles and their practical applications in trial situations. In addition, active involvement in this simulation provided direct experience that enriched their legal knowledge and strengthened their analytical and argumentative skills. This study concludes that moot court is an effective method to improve legal awareness and critical thinking skills among PPKn students, and recommends further integration of this method in higher legal education curricula.

Keywords

Moot Court Legal Awareness Critical Thinking Civics Education Case Study Method

Article Details

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

How to Cite
Belladonna, A. P. ., Hidayah, Y., & Tripuspita, N. . (2024). Optimizing Legal Awareness and Critical Thinking Education Through Moot Court Simulation. Golden Ratio of Data in Summary, 5(1), 01–07. https://doi.org/10.52970/grdis.v5i1.690
Download Citation
Endnote/Zotero/Mendeley (RIS)
BibTeX

References

  1. Aston, K. J. (2023). ‘Why is this hard, to have critical thinking?’ Exploring the factors affecting critical thinking with international higher education students. Active Learning in Higher Education, 0(0). https://doi.org/10.1177/14697874231168341
  2. Belladonna, A. P. (2024). The idea of anti-corruption education as it relates to Islamic education in Indonesia. Edukasi Islami: Jurnal Pendidikan Islam, 13(3). https://doi.org/10.30868/ei.v13i03.6504
  3. Belladonna, A. P., Hidayah, Y., & Tripuspita, N. (2024). Integrated service center for the empowerment of women and children (P2TP2A) for the protection of victims of sexual violence. Journal of Innovation Research and Knowledge, 2(9), 3441–3448.
  4. Blazkova, H. (2011). Telling tales of professional competence: Narrative in 60-second business networking speeches. The Journal of Business Communication, 48(4), 446–463. https://doi.org/10.1177/0021943611414541
  5. Hasibuan, M. S. P. (2013). Manajemen sumber daya manusia (Revised Edition). Jakarta: Bumi Aksara.
  6. Hidayah, Y., & Hamonangan, R. P. (2024). Kesadaran digital melalui pengembangan media pembelajaran interaktif berbasis android. Jurnal Inovasi Pendidikan dan Teknologi Informasi (JIPTI, 5(1), 12–23
  7. Jaswal, P., & Behera, B. (2024). Blended matters: Nurturing critical thinking. E-Learning and Digital Media, 21(2), 106–124. https://doi.org/10.1177/20427530231156184
  8. Kuncorowati, P. W. (2009). Menurunnya tingkat kesadaran hukum masyarakat Indonesia. Jurnal Civics, 6.
  9. Kusumaatmadja, M. (2006). Konsep-konsep hukum dalam pembangunan. Bandung: Alumni.
  10. Lee, D. E. (2006). Academic freedom, critical thinking, and teaching ethics. Arts and Humanities in Higher Education, 5(2), 199–208. https://doi.org/10.1177/1474022206064037
  11. Maxfield, F. N. (1930). The case study. Educ., Ress., Bull.
  12. Rahardjo, S. (2008). Membedah hukum progresif. Jakarta: Kompas.
  13. Rimiene, V. (2002). Assessing and developing students’ critical thinking. Psychology Learning & Teaching, 2(1), 17–22. https://doi.org/10.2304/plat.2002.2.1.17
  14. Sanusi, A. (1991). Pengantar ilmu hukum dan pengantar tata hukum Indonesia. Bandung: Tarsito.
  15. Saputro, J. D., & Hidayah, Y. (2024). Analisis muatan nilai-nilai karakter buku sebuah biografi Andy Noya (Kisah Hidupku). Journal of Education Research, 5(2), 1118–1128.
  16. Sunarso, D., et al. (2024). Content analysis of Pancasila and Civic Education curriculum at the junior high school level in Indonesia: Philosophical perspectives in affirming civic identity. Jurnal Civics: Media Kajian Kewarganegaraan, 21(1), 109–119.
  17. Sunarso, D., et al. (2024). Penguatan wawasan kebangsaan bagi siswa dan guru di SMA Negeri 1 Singaparna Kabupaten Tasikmalaya. Masyarakat: Jurnal Pengabdian, 1(1), 81–86. https://doi.org/10.58740/m-jp.v1i1.196
  18. Susanto, E. (2016). Pengaruh pembelajaran pendidikan Pancasila dan Kewarganegaraan terhadap pengembangan civic disposition siswa SMAN Se-Kota Bandar Lampung. Civics, 1(1).
  19. Suyato, Y., Hidayah, Y., & Ismiyani, Y. (2024). Optimizing democratic learning: Exploring the efficacy of demonstrative methods among middle school students. Journal of Pedagogi, 1(3), 27–32.
  20. Takwim, T., et al. (2024). Analisis implementasi moderasi beragama di SD Negeri 13 Salak Kota Sawahlunto: Studi tentang komitmen kebangsaan, anti-kekerasan, toleransi, dan penerimaan budaya. Indonesian Research Journal on Education, 4(4), 37–42. https://doi.org/10.31004/irje.v4i4.1018

Similar Articles

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 > >> 

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.