Article Sidebar

Download
Download Article

Main Article Content

Abstract

This paper discusses the transdisciplinary approach and its importance to be discussed and applied in the world of higher education research to understand and address the complexity of socio-cultural problems. Gillez Deleuze and Felix Guattari through a famous book, A Thousand Plateaus proposed two terms "arborescent" and "rhizome" as a metaphor for two paradigms and scientific approach in teaching and research. The concept “aborrescent” in many respects considered inadequate applied in the scientific world that tends to see reality is atomistic, but complex and mutually overlap (networking). Giles Deleuze and Felix Guattari proposed the concept of the rhizome as a metaphor for the paradigm and post-disciplinary scientific approach. UNESCO, CIRET and many scientific institutions and university in developed countries have done symposium, seminars and carry out research with a trans-disciplinary approach. The development of science-technology and complex and fast-changing cultural reality, requires colleges to understand and apply the trans-disciplinary approach.

Keywords

Concepts Arborrescent Rhizome Complex Reality Trans-Disciplinary Approach

Article Details

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

How to Cite
Lubis, A. Y. (2024). The Complex Reality and Trans-disciplinary Approach in World of Higher Education . Golden Ratio of Social Science and Education, 4(2), 104–111. https://doi.org/10.52970/grsse.v4i2.827
Download Citation
Endnote/Zotero/Mendeley (RIS)
BibTeX

References

  1. Adorno, T. W. (1976). The positivist dispute in German sociology. Harper & Row.
  2. Antonio, M., Daini, S., & Caruana, L. (Eds.). (2010). Anorexia nervosa: A multi-disciplinary approach: From biology to philosophy. Nova Science Publishers.
  3. Association of American Colleges and Universities. (2010). Creating interdisciplinary campus cultures: A model for strength and sustainability. Jossey-Bass.
  4. Ayer, A. J. (1936). Logical positivism: Language, truth, and logic. Victor Gollancz.
  5. Baudrillard, J. (1972). Toward a critique of the political economy of the sign. Telos Press.
  6. Baudrillard, J. (1988). Simulations. Semiotext(e).
  7. Baudrillard, J. (1988). The America. Verso.
  8. Bauman, Z. (1987). Life in fragments: Essays in postmodern morality. Blackwell.
  9. Beck, U. (1992). Risk society: Toward a new modernity. Sage.
  10. Bell, D. (2001). An introduction to cybercultures. Routledge.
  11. Castel, M., & Jaraway, D. H. (2007). Cyberculture theorists. Routledge.
  12. Castells, M. (1996). The information age: Economy, society, and culture. Blackwell.
  13. Conolly, W. E. (1982). Political theory and modernity. Oxford University Press.
  14. Darley, A. (2000). Visual digital culture. Routledge.
  15. Deleuze, G., & Guattari, F. (1983). Anti-Oedipus: Capitalism and schizophrenia. University of Chicago Press. (Original work published 1972)
  16. Deleuze, G., & Guattari, F. (1991). A thousand plateaus. University of Minnesota Press.
  17. Eco, U. (1984). Semiotics and the philosophy of language. Macmillan.
  18. Edwards, T. (Ed.). (2007). Cultural theory: Classical and contemporary positions. Sage Publications.
  19. Floridi, L. (2004). The Blackwell guide to the philosophy of computing and information. Blackwell Publishing.
  20. Foucault, M. (1967). Madness and civilization. Tavistock.
  21. Foucault, M. (1970). The order of things. Tavistock.
  22. Foucault, M. (1972). The archaeology of knowledge. Tavistock.
  23. Frey, B. S., & Stutzer, A. (Eds.). (2007). Economics and psychology: A promising new cross-disciplinary field. MIT Press.
  24. Giddens, A. (1979). Central problems in social theory. Macmillan.
  25. Giddens, A. (1990). The consequences of modernity. Stanford University Press.
  26. Giddens, A., & Turner, J. (1987). Social theory today. Polity Press.
  27. Guba, E. G. (1990). The paradigm dialog. Sage Publications.
  28. Habermas, J. (1971). Knowledge and human interest. Beacon Press.
  29. Habermas, J. (1987). Lectures on the philosophical discourse of modernity. MIT Press.
  30. Hacken, D. I. (1999). Cyborgs, cyberspace, an ethnographer looks to the future. Routledge.
  31. Handorn, G. H., et al. (Eds.). (2008). Handbook of transdisciplinary research: Interdisciplinary research and teaching among college and university faculty. Vanderbilt University Press.
  32. Herron, N. L. (Ed.). (2002). The social sciences: A cross-disciplinary guide to selected sources. Libraries Unlimited.
  33. Jameson, F. (1991). Postmodernism or the cultural logic of late capitalism. Duke University Press.
  34. Jenks, C. (1993). Culture. Routledge.
  35. Jenks, C. (2013). Culture: Studi kebudayaan (E. Setiawati, Trans.). Pustaka Pelajar.
  36. Karanika-Murray, M., & Wiesemers, R. (Eds.). (2009). Exploring avenues to interdisciplinary research: From cross- to multi- to interdisciplinary. Nottingham University Press.
  37. Kellner, D. (1995). Media culture: Cultural studies, identity, and politics between the modern and the postmodern. Routledge.
  38. Klein, J. T. (2010). Creating interdisciplinary campus cultures. Vanderbilt University Press.
  39. Kuhn, T. S. (1970). The structure of scientific revolutions. University of Chicago Press.
  40. Latour, B., & Woolgar, S. (1979). Laboratory life: The social construction of scientific facts. Cambridge University Press.
  41. Lattuca, L. R. (2001). Creating interdisciplinarity: Interdisciplinary research and teaching among college and university faculty. Vanderbilt University Press.
  42. Liebowitz, S. (2002). Re-thinking the network economy: The true forces that drive the digital marketplace. American Management Association.
  43. Lyotard, F. J. (1989). The postmodern condition: A report on knowledge. Manchester University Press.
  44. Marcuse, H. (1986). One-dimensional man. Beacon Press.
  45. McCaughey, M., & Ayers, M. D. (Eds.). (2003). Cyberactivism: Online activism in theory and practice. Routledge.
  46. Middleton, B. (2005). Cyber crime investigator’s field guide. Auerbach Publications.
  47. Munns, J., & Rajan, G. (Eds.). (1995). A cultural studies reader: History, theory, practice. Longman.
  48. Neurat, O., Carnap, R., & Morris, C. W. (1969). Foundations of the unity of science (Vol. I). University of Chicago Press.
  49. Popper, K. R. (1963). Conjectures and refutations: The growth of scientific knowledge. Routledge & Kegan Paul.
  50. Poster, M. (1988). Jean Baudrillard: Selected writings. Stanford University Press. (Original work published 1970)
  51. Rorty, R. (1980). Philosophy and the mirror of nature. Princeton University Press.
  52. Rorty, R. (1991). Objectivity, relativism, and truth (Vol. I). Cambridge University Press.
  53. Sardar, Z., & Van Loon, B. (2001). Mengenal kultural studies (A. Aldin, Trans.). Mizan Media Utama.
  54. Silver, D., & Massanari, A. (Eds.). (2006). Critical cyber-culture studies. New York University Press.
  55. Sollie, P., & Duwell, M. (Eds.). (2012). Evaluating new technologies: Methodological problems for the ethical assessment of technology developments. Springer.
  56. Spivak, G. C. (1989). In other worlds. Methuen.
  57. Springer, E. R. (Ed.). (2005). The Tutu archaeological village site: A multidisciplinary case study in human adaptation. Taylor & Francis.
  58. Stochemmer, P. W. (Ed.). (2012). Conceptualizing cultural hybridization: A transdisciplinary approach. Springer.
  59. Turner, B. S. (2011). Teori sosial dari klasik sampai postmodern (Trans. from The new Blackwell companion to social theory). Pustaka Pelajar.
  60. UNESCO. (1998). Transdisciplinarity, stimulating synergies, integrating knowledge. Division of Philosophy and Ethics.
  61. White, S. K. (2000). Affirmation in political theory: The strengths of weak ontology. Princeton University Press.
  62. Wood, A. F., & Smith, M. J. (2005). Online communication: Linking technology, identity, and culture. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.