Pedagogical and Contextual Factors Associated with Teachers’ Implementation of Digital Character Education in Bandung Elementary Schools
Main Article Content
Abstract
This study examined the pedagogical and contextual factors associated with teachers’ reported implementation of digital character education in Bandung elementary schools. Primary data were collected through a Google Forms questionnaire distributed with the assistance of participating schools. Participation was voluntary. Of the 360 teacher responses collected, 359 met the criteria for statistical analysis. Five predictors, namely digital pedagogical competence, character education self-efficacy, principal support, collaboration between schools and families, and digital resource adequacy, were examined using descriptive statistics, internal consistency assessments, and multiple linear regression with HC3 robust standard errors. The results revealed positive associations between all five predictors and teachers’ reported implementation of digital character education. Digital pedagogical competence and character education self efficacy demonstrated the strongest standardized associations. The regression model explained 44.6% of the variation in reported implementation, indicating the relevance of both teachers’ professional capabilities and their educational environments. The findings emphasize the importance of integrating character education into digital instructional practices rather than focusing exclusively on technology use. However, the cross-sectional design, voluntary recruitment, reliance on teachers’ self-reports, limited construct validation evidence, and inability to account for potential dependence among teachers from the same schools constrain the interpretation of the results. The findings therefore represent statistical associations rather than evidence of causal effects or improvements in students’ character development.
Downloads
Article Details

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
References
Amahoru, N., Jusriadi, E., & Anggoro, Y. A. R. (2024). Teacher competence and motivation to increase skills in using educational information technology. Golden Ratio of Social Science and Education, 4(2), 112–122. https://doi.org/10.52970/grsse.v4i2.468
Boateng, G. O., Neilands, T. B., Frongillo, E. A., Melgar-Quiñonez, H. R., & Young, S. L. (2018). Best practices for developing and validating scales for health, social, and behavioral research: A primer. Frontiers in Public Health, 6, Article 149. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpubh.2018.00149
Brown, M., McGrath, R. E., Bier, M. C., Johnson, K., & Berkowitz, M. W. (2023). A comprehensive meta-analysis of character education programs. Journal of Moral Education, 52(2), 119–138. https://doi.org/10.1080/03057240.2022.2060196
Caena, F., & Redecker, C. (2019). Aligning teacher competence frameworks to 21st century challenges: The case for the European Digital Competence Framework for Educators (DigCompEdu). European Journal of Education, 54(3), 356–369. https://doi.org/10.1111/ejed.12345
Chauhan, D. (2025). Exploring the role of animated cartoons in promoting values and social skills in children. Golden Ratio of Social Science and Education, 6(1), 18–25. https://doi.org/10.52970/grsse.v6i1.1394
Choi, M. (2016). A concept analysis of digital citizenship for democratic citizenship education in the Internet age. Theory & Research in Social Education, 44(4), 565–607. https://doi.org/10.1080/00933104.2016.1210549
Damanik, P. C. I. C., Jayanti, F. D., Chaled, M. I., Uli, A. A., & Husaeni, R. A. (2026). Cultivating Pancasila values in the digital era through teacher practices in Jakarta elementary schools. Jurnal Citizenship: Media Publikasi Pendidikan Pancasila dan Kewarganegaraan, 9(2), 54–60. https://doi.org/10.12928/citizenship.v9i2.1986
Döring, A. K., Jones, E., Oeschger, T. P., & Makarova, E. (2024). Giving voice to educators: Primary school teachers explain how they promote values to their pupils. European Journal of Psychology of Education, 39, 3607–3631. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10212-024-00885-8
Ertmer, P. A., & Ottenbreit-Leftwich, A. T. (2010). Teacher technology change: How knowledge, confidence, beliefs, and culture intersect. Journal of Research on Technology in Education, 42(3), 255–284. https://doi.org/10.1080/15391523.2010.10782551
Eysenbach, G. (2004). Improving the quality of Web surveys: The Checklist for Reporting Results of Internet E-Surveys (CHERRIES). Journal of Medical Internet Research, 6(3), e34. https://doi.org/10.2196/jmir.6.3.e34
Febiantoni, F. F., Sutrisno, C., Murdiono, M., Hidayah, Y., & Charismana, D. S. (2025). Development of a holistic partnership model of character education based on Android applications for junior high school students. Golden Ratio of Social Science and Education, 5(1), 148–166. https://doi.org/10.52970/grsse.v5i1.1153
Geldhof, G. J., Preacher, K. J., & Zyphur, M. J. (2014). Reliability estimation in a multilevel confirmatory factor analysis framework. Psychological Methods, 19(1), 72–91. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0032138
Goodall, J., & Montgomery, C. (2014). Parental involvement to parental engagement: A continuum. Educational Review, 66(4), 399–410. https://doi.org/10.1080/00131911.2013.781576
Hidayat, M., Rozak, R. W. A., Hakam, K. A., Kembara, M. D., & Parhan, M. (2022). Character education in Indonesia: How is it internalized and implemented in virtual learning? Jurnal Cakrawala Pendidikan, 41(1), 186–198. https://doi.org/10.21831/cp.v41i1.45920
Lakens, D. (2022). Sample size justification. Collabra: Psychology, 8(1), Article 33267. https://doi.org/10.1525/collabra.33267
Lauricella, A. R., Herdzina, J., & Robb, M. (2020). Early childhood educators’ teaching of digital citizenship competencies. Computers & Education, 158, Article 103989. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2020.103989
Lesnawati, L. (2025). Utilization of digital learning media from the perspective of educational management in the era of Merdeka Belajar curriculum at Islamic college. Golden Ratio of Social Science and Education, 6(1), 35–52. https://doi.org/10.52970/grsse.v6i1.1910
Li, C.-H. (2016). Confirmatory factor analysis with ordinal data: Comparing robust maximum likelihood and diagonally weighted least squares. Behavior Research Methods, 48, 936–949. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13428-015-0619-7
McNeish, D., & Stapleton, L. M. (2016). Modeling clustered data with very few clusters. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 51(4), 495–518. https://doi.org/10.1080/00273171.2016.1167008
Nur’aini, & Sumianti. (2025). Developing learning strategies to improve students’ learning motivation. Golden Ratio of Social Science and Education, 5(2), 561–568. https://doi.org/10.52970/grsse.v5i2.1669
Petko, D. (2012). Teachers’ pedagogical beliefs and their use of digital media in classrooms: Sharpening the focus of the ‘will, skill, tool’ model and integrating teachers’ constructivist orientations. Computers & Education, 58(4), 1351–1359. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2011.12.013
Podsakoff, P. M., MacKenzie, S. B., Lee, J.-Y., & Podsakoff, N. P. (2003). Common method biases in behavioral research: A critical review of the literature and recommended remedies. Journal of Applied Psychology, 88(5), 879–903. https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.88.5.879
Scherer, R., Siddiq, F., & Tondeur, J. (2019). The technology acceptance model (TAM): A meta-analytic structural equation modeling approach to explaining teachers’ adoption of digital technology in education. Computers & Education, 128, 13–35. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2018.09.009
Tadlaoui-Brahmi, A., Çuko, K., & Alvarez, L. (2022). Digital citizenship in primary education: A systematic literature review describing how it is implemented. Social Sciences & Humanities Open, 6(1), Article 100348. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssaho.2022.100348
Tschannen-Moran, M., & Woolfolk Hoy, A. (2001). Teacher efficacy: Capturing an elusive construct. Teaching and Teacher Education, 17(7), 783–805. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0742-051X(01)00036-1
Von Elm, E., Altman, D. G., Egger, M., Pocock, S. J., Gøtzsche, P. C., & Vandenbroucke, J. P. (2007). The Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE) statement: Guidelines for reporting observational studies. The Lancet, 370(9596), 1453–1457. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(07)61602-X
Widaningsih, W., & Herlambang, Y. T. (2025). Sundanese culture-based character learning program “Gelar Nyunda” (Case study at SDN 172 Andir Kidul, Bandung City). Curricula: Journal of Curriculum Development, 4(2), 1441–1454. https://doi.org/10.17509/curricula.v4i2.86745
Wolf, E. J., Harrington, K. M., Clark, S. L., & Miller, M. W. (2013). Sample size requirements for structural equation models: An evaluation of power, bias, and solution propriety. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 73(6), 913–934. https://doi.org/10.1177/0013164413495237
Zeng, M., Cheah, K. S. L., & Abdullah, Z. (2025). The influence of school principals’ digital leadership on teachers’ competency in integrating artificial intelligence: A systematic thematic review. Frontiers in Education, 10, Article 1655967. https://doi.org/10.3389/feduc.2025.1655967