Article Sidebar

Download
Download Article

Main Article Content

Abstract

This study aims to describe the community's perception of the implementation of PT. BEL's Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR) program in Seunagan District, Nagan Raya Regency. This study uses a qualitative method with a phenomenological approach, in which researchers seek to understand the experiences and views of the Ring 1 community regarding the implementation of the company's CSR program. Data were obtained through in-depth interviews with community leaders, village officials, and program beneficiaries. The results of the study indicate that the community has a positive perception of PT. BEL's CSR program because it is considered to provide a real contribution to improving welfare, especially in the fields of education, health, social, and economics. However, the implementation of CSR is considered uneven and unsustainable because it still relies on proposals from the village government and there is a lack of transparency and coordination between the company and the local government. The implementation of PT. BEL's CSR program is also still short-term and does not have clear continuity, so its benefits have not been felt comprehensively by the community. Therefore, improved coordination, strategic planning, and periodic evaluation are needed so that CSR implementation can be more effective, inclusive, and sustainable in supporting the social and economic development of the communities around the company's operational areas.

Keywords

CSR Public Perception Social Welfare

Article Details

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

How to Cite
Saputra, E., Khairani, C., & Muhtarom, M. (2025). Social Review of Public Perception of PT. BEL’s Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR) Policy in Seunagan District. Golden Ratio of Social Science and Education, 6(1), 26–34. https://doi.org/10.52970/grsse.v6i1.1832
Download Citation
Endnote/Zotero/Mendeley (RIS)
BibTeX

References

  1. Abdullah, Z. (2024). Public Perception of the Implementation of the CSR Program of PT. Anugerah Bara Kaltim. 12(2), 180–193.
  2. Afifah, N., Astuti, SWW, & Irawan, D. (2021). The Influence of Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR) and Corporate Reputation on Firm Value. EKUITAS (Journal of Economics and Finance), 5(3), 346–364. https://doi.org/10.24034/j25485024.y2021.v5.i3.4644
  3. Anggraini, C. (2018). Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR) as a Public Relations Communication Media (Descriptive Quantitative Study of Benefit Acceptance Opinions on CSR Programs of Five Companies in Indonesia). Universitas Brawijaya. Basri, H., Budi, H., Teniro, A., AB, S., Efendi, M., & Surya, A. (2022). Community Participation in Formulating Policies at Village Musrenbang. Journal of Public Policy, 13(1), 25–32.
  4. Galib Lahada. (2017). Public Perception of Administrative Services in. Administratie, 8.
  5. Hakim, L. (2011). Policy Management in Building Public Participation. Authority: Journal of Government Science, 1(1), 65–71. https://doi.org/10.26618/ojip.v1i1.20
  6. Juhaidi, A. (2012). PT Adaro Indonesia Education for Schools and Madrasahs. 14(1), 104–119.
  7. Mustari, N., & Maulia, MP (2023). Coal Mining Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR) and Its Impact on Community Welfare in Berau Regency, East Kalimantan. VIII(02), 107–121. Ministry of Energy and Mineral Resources. (2021). Indonesian Mineral & Coal Policy. Directorate General of Minerals and Coal, 48.
  8. Kurniadi, A. (2010). University Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR) Reporting Based on Website Analysis at the National University of Singapore and Gadjah Mada University. The Development of University-Based Entrepreneurship Ecosystems: Global Practices, 5(2), 149–176. https://doi.org/10.4337/9781849805896.00017
  9. Kurniawan, Syawaludin, Khairunisa, M. (2023). Implementation of Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR) Funds in Community Empowerment Programs. Journal of Sharia and Law, 2(3), 689–703. https://repository.uin-suska.ac.id/74418/%0Ahttp://repository.uin-suska.ac.id/74418/1/SKRIPSI GABUNGAN.pdf
  10. Nelly, S. (2024). Public Participation in the Public Policy-Making Process. Jurnal Sociopolitico, 6(1), 87–95. https://fisipolupgriplk.ac.id/jurnal/index.php/JSP/article/view/119
  11. Ningtyas, CP, & Munawir Makmur. (2022). IMPLEMENTATION OF CORPORATE SOCIAL RESPONSIBILITY STUDY AT PT. ANEKA TAMBANG Tbk. UBPN SOUTHEAST SULAWESI. Journal Publicuho, 5(4), 1091–1112. https://doi.org/10.35817/publicuho.v5i4.50
  12. Nisa, AH, Hasna, H., Yarni, L., Islam, U., Sjech, N., & Djambek, MD (2023). Perception Method Introduction. 2(4), 213–226.
  13. Pratiwi, A., Nurulrahmatia, N., & Muniarty, P. (2020). The Effect of Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR) on Profitability in Banking Companies Listed on the IDX. Owner, 4(1), 95.https://doi.org/10.33395/owner.v4i1.201
  14. Putri, RD, & Malau, H. (2021). Village Community Participation in Improving Village Facilities and Infrastructure Development in Ladang Panjang Village, Pasaman Regency. Journal of Management and Public Administration (JMIAP), 3(1), 56–62. https://doi.org/10.24036/jmiap.v3i1.240
  15. Rochmaniah, A., & Sinduwiatmoto, K. (2020). Textbook of Corporate Social Responsibility and Community Development. In Textbook of Corporate Social Responsibility and Community Development.
  16. Sutrisna, IW (2020). Public Participation in Regional Budget Policy. Cakrawarti Scientific Journal, 1(2), 30–37.https://doi.org/10.47532/jic.v1i2.14