Main Article Content

Abstract

Micro, Small, and Medium Enterprises (MSMEs) represent a cornerstone of Indonesia’s economic structure, particularly in regions like Deli Serdang. Yet, MSMEs continue to face persistent challenges in digital transformation and environmental sustainability. This study investigates the synergistic role of digital value chains and green finance in enhancing the sustainability of MSMEs by focusing on their strategic capabilities. Using a quantitative approach with Structural Equation Modeling (SEM), data were collected from 400 MSME respondents across 22 sub-districts. SEM was chosen due to its suitability for analyzing complex relationships among latent constructs. The study addresses the following research question: To what extent does the integration of digitalization and green finance influence MSME sustainability through strategic capabilities? Findings indicate that digital adoption improves operational efficiency and market responsiveness, while green finance strengthens long-term sustainability orientations. Notably, their interaction creates a compounded effect on resilience and competitiveness. Practical implications suggest that this integrative model can guide policymakers, financial institutions, and local stakeholders in designing inclusive digital-financial ecosystems for MSMEs. The study extends the Resource-Based View and Triple Bottom Line frameworks by demonstrating their applicability in local MSME contexts.

Keywords

MSME Sustainability Green Finance Strategic Capabilities

Article Details

How to Cite
Siagian, N., Siregar, N., & Sinaga, N. T. (2026). Strategic Pillars of MSME Sustainability: The Role of Digital Value Chains and Green Finance in Deli Serdang Regency. Golden Ratio of Social Science and Education, 6(1), 192–201. https://doi.org/10.52970/grsse.v6i1.1714

References

  1. ADB. (2021). Asian Development Outlook 2021: Financing a green and inclusive recovery. Asian Development Bank. https://www.adb.org
  2. Bai, Y., et al. (2020). Green finance and sustainable development: Evidence from China. Journal of Cleaner Production, 256, 120–132. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.120
  3. Barney, J. (1991). Firm resources and sustained competitive advantage. Journal of Management, 17(1), 99–120. https://doi.org/10.1177/014920639101700108
  4. Bharadwaj, A., El Sawy, O. A., Pavlou, P. A., & Venkatraman, N. (2013). Digital business strategy: Toward a next generation of insights. MIS Quarterly, 37(2), 471–482. https://doi.org/10.25300/MISQ/2013/37.2.3
  5. Bocken, N. M. P., Short, S. W., Rana, P., & Evans, S. (2014). A literature and practice review to develop sustainable business model archetypes. Journal of Cleaner Production, 65, 42–56. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2013.11.039
  6. Dyllick, T., & Hockerts, K. (2002). Beyond the business case for corporate sustainability. Business Strategy and the Environment, 11(2), 130–141. https://doi.org/10.1002/bse.323
  7. Elkington, J. (1997). Cannibals with forks: The triple bottom line of 21st century business. Capstone Publishing.
  8. Ghobakhloo, M. (2018). The future of manufacturing industry: A strategic roadmap toward Industry 4.0. Journal of Manufacturing Technology Management, 29(6), 910–936. https://doi.org/10.1108/JMTM-02-2018-0057
  9. Ghosh, S., & Vinod, D. (2017). What constrains financial inclusion for women? Evidence from Indian micro data. World Development, 92, 60–81. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.worlddev.2016.11.011
  10. Hart, S. L., & Milstein, M. B. (2003). Creating sustainable value. Academy of Management Executive, 17(2), 56–67. https://doi.org/10.5465/ame.2003.10025194
  11. Lengnick-Hall, C. A., Beck, T. E., & Lengnick-Hall, M. L. (2011). Developing a capacity for organizational resilience. Human Resource Management Review, 21(3), 243–255. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.hrmr.2010.07.001
  12. Ministry of Cooperatives and SMEs. (2021). MSME statistics report 2021. Government of Indonesia.
  13. Newbert, S. L. (2007). Empirical research on the resource-based view of the firm. Strategic Management Journal, 28(2), 121–146. https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.573
  14. Nurfadila, M. Y. (2023). Unlocking local prosperity: Empowering communities through small Business Financing. Golden Ratio of Community Services and Dedication, 3(1), 18-28.
  15. Porter, M. E., & Heppelmann, J. E. (2014). How smart, connected products are transforming competition. Harvard Business Review, 92(11), 64–88.
  16. Revell, A., Stokes, D., & Chen, H. (2010). Small businesses and the environment. Business Strategy and the Environment, 19(5), 273–288. https://doi.org/10.1002/bse.628
  17. Sachs, J. D., et al. (2019). Sustainable development report 2019. Bertelsmann Stiftung and SDSN. https://www.sdgindex.org
  18. Schaltegger, S., Burritt, R., & Petersen, H. (2012). An introduction to corporate environmental management. Routledge.
  19. Serdarušić, H., et al. (2024). Green finance adoption in SMEs: Evidence from emerging economies. Sustainability, 16(2), 1–15. https://doi.org/10.3390/su16020000
  20. Teece, D. J. (2007). Explicating dynamic capabilities. Strategic Management Journal, 28(13), 1319–1350. https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.640
  21. Teece, D. J. (2014). The foundations of enterprise performance. Academy of Management Perspectives, 28(4), 328–352. https://doi.org/10.5465/amp.2013.0116
  22. UNEP. (2016). Green finance progress report. United Nations Environment Programme. https://www.unep.org
  23. Wang, Y., & Zhi, Q. (2016). The role of green finance in environmental protection. Energy Procedia, 104, 311–316. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.egypro.2016.12.053
  24. Wernerfelt, B. (1984). A resource-based view of the firm. Strategic Management Journal, 5(2), 171–180. https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.4250050207
  25. Yunis, M., Tarhini, A., & Kassar, A. (2017). The role of ICT and innovation in enhancing organizational performance. Journal of Business Research, 88, 1–9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2017.10.043
  26. Zhang, D., Mohsin, M., Rasheed, A. K., et al. (2019). Public spending and green economic growth. Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 26, 1–14. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-019-05024-6