Article Sidebar

Download
Download Article

Main Article Content

Abstract

This study explores the development of effective learning strategies aimed at enhancing students' learning motivation. Employing a systematic literature review (SLR) method, this research analyzes scholarly works published in the last ten years. The findings reveal that active, contextual, and student-centered approaches such as Problem-Based Learning, Project-Based Learning, and collaborative learning can significantly increase students’ intrinsic and extrinsic motivation. Furthermore, integrating technology through digital media, e-learning, and gamification improves students’ engagement and learning satisfaction. The application of Keller’s ARCS motivational model, Gardner’s theory of Multiple Intelligences, and Vygotsky’s sociocultural approach provides a comprehensive theoretical foundation for designing motivational learning strategies. The study emphasizes the importance of teacher competence, technological adaptation, and supportive learning environments. This research contributes theoretically and practically to education by offering a conceptual framework for designing strategies that improve student motivation in the modern learning context.

Keywords

Learning Strategies Student Motivation ARCS Model Digital Learning

Article Details

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

How to Cite
Nur’aini, & Sumianti. (2025). Developing Learning Strategies to Improve Students’ Learning Motivation. Golden Ratio of Social Science and Education, 5(2), 561–568. https://doi.org/10.52970/grsse.v5i2.1669
Download Citation
Endnote/Zotero/Mendeley (RIS)
BibTeX

References

  1. Deci, E. L., & Ryan, R. M. (2000). The "what" and "why" of goal pursuits: Human needs and the self-determination of behavior. Psychological Inquiry, 11(4), 227–268.
  2. Gardner, H. (2011). Frames of mind: The theory of multiple intelligences (3rd ed.). Basic Books.
  3. Jejen, A., Naulina, R. Y., Susanti, P. H., & Rosid, A. (2023). Enhancing Financial Literacy of Rural Communities Through Training and Mentoring: Case Study in South Toapaya Village, Toapaya Bintan, Riau Islands. International Journal of Community Service (IJCS), 2(2).
  4. Joyce, B., Weil, M., & Calhoun, E. (2011). Models of teaching (8th ed.). Pearson.
  5. Keller, J. M. (2010). Motivational design for learning and performance: The ARCS model approach. Springer.
  6. Kong, Y. (2021). The role of experiential learning on students’ motivation and classroom engagement. Frontiers in Psychology, 12, 771272.
  7. Miles, M. B., & Huberman, A. M. (1994). Qualitative data analysis: An expanded sourcebook (2nd ed.). Sage Publications.
  8. Ali, M. I., Ismail, A., & MY, N. (2025). The Effect of STEAM-Based Environmental Learning on Students ’ Ecoliteracy Level at SDI Hartaco Indah Makassar. Journal Iof IInnovative and Creativity, 5(2), 11280–11288.
  9. MY, N., Ardiansyah, M., & Sarbani, A. A. (2025). Meningkatkan Keaktifan Siswa Melalui Model Project Based Learning dengan Pendekatan TPACK. Pinisi Journal PGSD, 5(March), 62–68. https://doi.org/10.70713/pjp.v5i1.52502
  10. My, N., Hajar, S., & Arsyad, M. N. F. (2024). Applications Utilizing Quizizz for Game-Based Learning in Elementary Science Education. Journal of Education and Computer ApplicationsComputer Applications, 1(1). https://jeca.aks.or.id/index.php/jeca/index
  11. Nadeak, B., Prihantini, P., Jejen, A., Astuti, H. P., Sutiapermana, A., & Handayani, H. (2023). Measure the effectiveness of reproductive health education programs for teenagers in intermediate schools: Evaluation results in the Cileunyi Region, Bandung Regency. International Journal of Community Service, 2(2), 197-210.
  12. Nuzli, M., Nadeak, B., Mini, M., Jejen, A., & Hardiyanti, N. R. (2023). Management Innovation in Education: Application Case Studies, Technology Learning Based Intelligence, Artificial Intelligence in Higher Education. International Journal of Educational Research Excellence (IJERE), 2(2), 493-500.
  13. Patzak, A., & Zhang, X. (2025). Blending teacher autonomy support and provision of structure in the classroom for optimal motivation: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Educational Psychology Review, 37(1), Article 17.
  14. Pintrich, P. R., & Schunk, D. H. (2002). Motivation in education: Theory, research, and applications (2nd ed.). Merrill Prentice Hall.
  15. Prihantini, P., Rukmini, A., Kogoya, W., Nadeak, B., & Jejen, A. (2024). Primary school health content gaps and school curriculum implications. Jurnal Konseling dan Pendidikan, 12(4), 305-319.
  16. Santrock, J. W. (2018). Educational psychology (6th ed.). McGraw-Hill Education.
  17. Slavin, R. E. (2015). Educational psychology: Theory and practice (11th ed.). Pearson.
  18. Suhilmiati, E., Hanika, I. M., Hardiyanti, N. R., Jejen, A., & Sutiapermana, A. (2024). The Role of Digital Literacy in Islamic Religious Education Learning in the Technology Era at MAN 3 Banyuwangi. International Journal of Educational Research Excellence (IJERE), 3(1), 313-320.
  19. Vygotsky, L. S. (1978). Mind in society: The development of higher psychological processes. Harvard University Press.