Article Sidebar

Download
Download Article

Main Article Content

Abstract

This article studied the influence of artificial intelligence on alleviating cognitive load and promoting cognitive longevity in master's mathematics students at the Catholic University of Ghana. Stress in academic programs, time constraints, and burnout are rising issues, particularly in postgraduate programs in STEM. Therefore, this study examines the impact of AI apps such as ChatGPT, WolframAlpha, and Grammarly on providing cognitive support and emotional sustenance in academic environments. The study is guided by Cognitive Load Theory (Sweller, 1988), Allostatic Load Theory (McEwen, 1998), and Socio-Technical Systems Theory (Trist, 1981) and follows a mixed-method approach consisting of survey data from 100 master's students and in-depth interviews. The survey revealed that 78 percent were moderately to highly cognitively overloaded, while 65 percent utilized AI to work on their academic tasks. A notable negative relationship was found between AI use and perceived stress (r = -0.42, p < 0.01), with more confidence in academic work and improved time management. ANOVA revealed significant differences in stress levels among the different frequencies of AI use (F = 4.56, p < 0.05). Qualitative analyses generated the core themes of "AI as a cognitive assistant," "digital dependency," and "emotional assurance." Their reports indicated that they used AI to help them understand complex mathematical ideas, organize their academic writing, and calm their nerves about presentations. However, they voiced worries about becoming overdependent on it, issues of academic integrity, and ethics concerning AI's role in learning. The end product maintains that AI is a reasonable tool for easing cognitive load, encouraging mental well-being, and enhancing cognitive longevity. These findings have policy implications for the inclusion of AI literacy in both academic and national digital educational frameworks. AI implementation strategies could disappear into the topping of teaching success while serving the broader public health agenda of student mental health and human capital development.

Keywords

AI Cognitive Overload Cognitive Longevity Academic Stress Higher Education AI Literacy Public Health Mathematics Education Mental Well-Being Ghana

Article Details

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

How to Cite
Addae, R. K., & Brown, C. (2025). The Role of Artificial Intelligence in Enhancing Human Longevity: Mitigating Cognitive Overload for Extended Lifespan Among Master’s Students in Mathematics at the Catholic University of Ghana. Golden Ratio of Social Science and Education, 5(2), 302–318. https://doi.org/10.52970/grsse.v5i2.1275
Download Citation
Endnote/Zotero/Mendeley (RIS)
BibTeX

References

  1. Amponsah, M., & Owolabi, H. O. (2011). Perceived stress levels of university students in Ghana: A case study. International Journal of Research in Social Sciences, 2(3), 1–10.
  2. Baxter, G., & Sommerville, I. (2011). Socio-technical systems: From design methods to systems engineering. Interacting with Computers, 23(1), 4–17.
  3. Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3(2), 77–101.
  4. Creswell, J. W., & Plano Clark, V. L. (2017). Designing and conducting mixed methods research (3rd ed.). Sage Publications.
  5. Fries, J. F. (2002). Aging, natural death, and the compression of morbidity. Bulletin of the World Health Organization, 80(3), 245–250.
  6. Kirschner, P. A. (2002). Cognitive load theory: Implications of cognitive load theory on learning design. Learning and Instruction, 12(1), 1-10.
  7. Luckin, R., Holmes, W., Griffiths, M., & Forcier, L. B. (2016). Intelligence unleashed: An argument for AI in education. Pearson Education.
  8. Lupien, S. J., McEwen, B. S., Gunnar, M. R., & Heim, C. (2009). Effects of stress throughout the lifespan on the brain, behaviour, and cognition. Nature Reviews Neuroscience, 10(6), 434–445.
  9. McEwen, B. S., & Stellar, E. (1993). Stress and the individual: Mechanisms leading to disease. Archives of Internal Medicine, 153(18), 2093–2101.
  10. Olshansky, S. J., Passaro, D. J., Hershow, R. C., et al. (2018). A potential decline in life expectancy in the United States in the 21st century. New England Journal of Medicine, 352(11), 1138–1145.
  11. Paas, F., Renkl, A., & Sweller, J. (2003). Cognitive load theory and instructional design: Recent developments. Educational Psychologist, 38(1), 1–4.
  12. Roll, I., & Wylie, R. (2016). Evolution and revolution in artificial intelligence in education. International Journal of Artificial Intelligence in Education, 26, 582–599.
  13. Russell, S., & Norvig, P. (2016). Artificial intelligence: A modern approach (3rd ed.). Pearson.
  14. Sapolsky, R. M. (2004). Why Zebras Do Not Get Ulcers. Henry Holt and Company.
  15. Selwyn, N. (2019). Should robots replace teachers? AI and the future of education. Polity Press.
  16. Sweller, J. (1988). Cognitive load during problem solving: Effects on learning. Cognitive Science, 12(2), 257–285.
  17. Sweller, J., Ayres, P., & Kalyuga, S. (2011). Cognitive load theory. Springer.
  18. Trist, E. L., & Bamforth, K. W. (1951). Some social and psychological consequences of the longwall method of coal-getting. Human Relations, 4(1), 3–38.