Article Sidebar

Download
Download Article

Main Article Content

Abstract

The maritime industry, a global powerhouse for trade and transportation, is on the cusp of a transformative era driven by Artificial Intelligence (AI). This paper explores the potential of AI to revolutionize various aspects of the maritime sector, from navigation and route optimization to predictive maintenance and enhanced safety. This paper will study AI implementation in the inspection and consulting industry. This AI will help speed up the maritime industry's regulatory compliance process and maintenance services. The study showed four main stakeholders in AI implementation: Operational experts, managers, clients, and the AI team. Each stakeholder has a crucial role in successfully implementing AI in this industry. This study will map out each stakeholder's interest using SSM, giving a clear picture of what each stakeholder wants and their apprehensions. The result of this study is some conditions that need to be met by each stakeholder for the implementation of AI in this sector to be successful.

Keywords

Artificial Intelligence SSM Technology Implementation Maritime

Article Details

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

How to Cite
Suprajeni, M. R., Yopan, M., & Fitriati, R. (2025). Innovation Through AI Integration: A Study of AI Technology Adoption for the Maritime Inspection and Consulting Sector using Soft System Methodology. Golden Ratio of Social Science and Education, 5(1), 238–244. https://doi.org/10.52970/grsse.v5i1.1174
Download Citation
Endnote/Zotero/Mendeley (RIS)
BibTeX

References

  1. Bradbury, H. (2015). The SAGE Handbook of Action Research. SAGE Publications Ltd. https://doi.org/10.4135/9781473921290
  2. Challender, S. (2000). Systems Thinking, Systems Practice. By Peter B. Checkland. Published by John Wiley, Chichester, UK, 1981, 330 pp., ISBN 0 471 27911 0 (republished 1999 in paperback, with a 30-year retrospective). From a practitioner perspective. Systems Research and Behavioral Science, 17(S1), S78–S80. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1002/1099-1743(200011)17:1+<::AID-SRES384>3.0.CO;2-N
  3. Vidal, R. V. V. (2005). J. Rosenhead and J. Mingers (Eds.), Rational Analysis for a Problematic World Revisited, Problem Structuring Methods for Complexity, Uncertainty and Conflict, Wiley, Chichester, 2001, xviii+366 pages, £ 22.50. European Journal of Operational Research, 161(2), 582–583. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejor.2004.03.004
  4. Wheeler, F., Checkland, P., & Scholes, J. (2000). Soft Systems Methodology in Action: Including a 30-Year Retrospective. The Journal of the Operational Research Society, 51, 648. https://doi.org/10.2307/254201
  5. Simon, G.., Dinardo, C.., Takahashi, Koichi., Cascone, T.., Powers, Cynthia A.., Stevens, Rick J., Allen, Joshua., Antonoff, M.., Gomez, D.., Keane, P.., Saiz, Fernando Jose Suarez., Nguyen, Q.., Roarty, Emily B.., Pierce, S.., Zhang, Jianjun., Barnhill, Emily Hardeman., Lakhani, Kate., Shaw, K.., Smith, Brett., Swisher, S.., High, Rob., Futreal, P.., Heymach, J.., & Chin, L.. (2018). Applying Artificial Intelligence to Address the Knowledge Gaps in Cancer Care. The oncologist, 24 6, 772–782. http://doi.org/10.1634/theoncologist.2018-0257
  6. Șerban, A.., & Lytras, Miltiadis Demetrios. (2020). Artificial Intelligence for Smart Renewable Energy Sector in Europe—Smart Energy Infrastructures for Next Generation Smart Cities. IEEE Access, 8, 77364-77377. http://doi.org/10.1109/ACCESS.2020.2990123
  7. Shivaprakash, K. N., Swami, N., Mysorekar, S., Arora, R., Gangadharan, A., Vohra, K., Jadeyegowda, M., & Kiesecker, J. (2022). Potential for Artificial Intelligence (AI) and Machine Learning (ML) Applications in Biodiversity Conservation, Managing Forests, and Related Services in India. Sustainability. http://doi.org/10.3390/su14127154
  8. Lyon, A. R., Pullmann, M., Whitaker, K., Ludwig, K. A., Wasse, J.K., & McCauley, E. (2019). A Digital Feedback System to Support Implementation of Measurement-Based Care by School-Based Mental Health Clinicians. Journal of Clinical Child & Adolescent Psychology, 48, S168-S179. http://doi.org/10.1080/15374416.2017.1280808
  9. Regona, M., Yigitcanlar, T, Xia, B., & Li, R.. (2022). Opportunities and Adoption Challenges of AI in the Construction Industry: A PRISMA Review. Journal of Open Innovation: Technology, Market, and Complexity. http://doi.org/10.3390/joitmc8010045
  10. Dora, M., Kumar, A., Mangla, S., Pant, A., & Kamal, M. (2021). Critical success factors influencing artificial intelligence adoption in food supply chains. International Journal of Production Research, 60, 4621–4640. http://doi.org/10.1080/00207543.2021.1959665
  11. Tahiru, F. (2021). AI in Education: A Systematic Literature Review. J. Cases Inf. Technol. , 23, 1–20. http://doi.org/10.4018/jcit.2021010101
  12. Schaefer, Cindy., Lemmer, K.., Kret, Kret Samy., Ylinen, Maija., Mikalef, Patrick., & Niehaves, Björn. (2021). Truth or Dare? - How can we influence the Adoption of Artificial Intelligence in Municipalities?. 1-10. http://doi.org/10.24251/HICSS.2021.286
  13. Osamy, W., Khedr, A., Salim, A., AlAli, A., & El-sawy, A. (2022). Recent Studies Utilizing Artificial Intelligence Techniques for Solving Data Collection, Aggregation, and Dissemination Challenges in Wireless Sensor Networks: A Review. Electronics. http://doi.org/10.3390/electronics11030313
  14. Rawindaran, Nisha., Jayal, Ambikesh., & Prakash, E.. (2021). Machine Learning Cybersecurity Adoption in Small and Medium Enterprises in Developed Countries. Comput. , 10, 150. http://doi.org/10.3390/computers10110150
  15. Marinakis, Vangelis., Koutsellis, Themistoklis., Nikas, A.., & Doukas, H.. (2021). AI and Data Democratisation for Intelligent Energy Management. Energies. http://doi.org/10.3390/EN14144341
  16. Schlögl, Stephan., Postulka, Claudia., Bernsteiner, R.., & Ploder, Christian. (2019). Artificial Intelligence Tool Penetration in Business: Adoption, Challenges, and Fears. , 259-270. http://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-21451-7_22