Main Article Content

Abstract

Community development and empowerment have long been part of the vision and mission of the Indonesian government, from the central level to regional and village governments. This mandate is rooted in the 1945 Constitution of the Republic of Indonesia and further supported by several regulations, including Law No. 25 of 2004 on the National Development Planning System and Law No. 23 of 2014 on Regional Government, as amended by Law No. 9 of 2015. One of the key stages in regional development planning is the musrenbang (development planning deliberation), a participatory planning process. However, not all initiatives can be realized due to the high volume of proposals from the residents. In response to this challenge, Samarinda Mayor Andi Harun and Deputy Mayor Rusmadi, for the 2021–2024 period, introduced the Community Development and Empowerment Program, known as Probebaya. This program aims to strengthen village-level governance, enhance the quality of human resources among officials and residents, empower the local economy, increase environmental awareness, and improve basic infrastructure at the neighborhood (RT) level. Probebaya is a key element in implementing the city's micro-level development mission. This study adopts a qualitative research approach with an exploratory design, delving deeply into Probebaya as a flagship initiative and a tangible expression of the Samarinda City Government's political commitment to its citizens. Data were analyzed using the interactive model by Miles, Huberman, and Saldana (2014). The findings reveal that the Samarinda City Government has fulfilled its political promise of providing a 100 million rupiah development fund for each RT head through Probebaya. The program serves as a commitment to community development and empowerment via a region-based model coordinated at the RT level and implemented through a Type IV self-managed funding scheme. Now in its fifth year, Probebaya has undergone several improvements and refinements. However, challenges remain, particularly in synchronization and harmonization with village partner institutions, whose roles have seemingly been replaced by the growing strength of RT-level community empowerment initiatives. The political promises made during the campaign, along with the challenges posed by the transition from the COVID-19 pandemic to an endemic phase, have required the current Mayor and Deputy Mayor to "think and act beyond the usual"—in other words, to think and operate outside the box.

Keywords

Commitment Samarinda City Government Building and Empowering the Community Probebaya

Article Details

How to Cite
Habibi , M., Eryani, T. W. R., & Yani, A. (2025). Samarinda City Government’s Commitment to Building and Empowering the Community Through Probebaya . Golden Ratio of Social Science and Education, 5(1), 141–147. https://doi.org/10.52970/grsse.v5i1.1140

References

  1. Agustino, L. (2017). Basics of public policy (Rev. ed.). Bandung: Alfabeta.
  2. Hamdi, M. (2015). Public policy process, analysis, and participation (2nd ed.). Bogor: Ghalia Indonesia.
  3. Indonesia. (2014). Undang-Undang Republik Indonesia Nomor 23 Tahun 2014 tentang Pemerintahan Daerah. Lembaran Negara Republik Indonesia Tahun 2014 Nomor 244.
  4. Indonesia. (2015). Undang-Undang Republik Indonesia Nomor 9 Tahun 2015 tentang Perubahan Kedua atas Undang-Undang Nomor 23 Tahun 2014 tentang Pemerintahan Daerah. Lembaran Negara Republik Indonesia Tahun 2015 Nomor 58.
  5. Mahmudi. (2015). Public sector performance management. Yogyakarta: Publishing and Printing Unit of YKPN School of Management Science.
  6. Masruri. (2014). Analysis of the effectiveness of the national program for empowering urban independent communities. Padang: Akademia Permata.
  7. Miles, M. B., Huberman, A. M., & Saldana, J. (2014). Qualitative data analysis: A methods sourcebook (3rd ed.). California: Sage Publications, Inc.
  8. Moleong, L. J. (2010). Qualitative research methodology (Rev. ed.). Bandung: PT Remaja Rosdakarya.
  9. Mukarom, Z., & Laksana, M. W. (2018). Public service management (2nd ed.). Bandung: CV Pustaka Setia.
  10. Mulyadi, D. (2016). Public policy and service study. Bandung: Alfabeta.
  11. Indonesia. (2004). Undang-Undang Republik Indonesia Nomor 25 Tahun 2004 tentang Sistem Perencanaan Pembangunan Nasional. Lembaran Negara Republik Indonesia Tahun 2004 Nomor 104.
  12. Nugroho, R. (2011). Public policy: Policy dynamics, policy analysis, policy management (3rd ed.). Jakarta: PT Gramedia.
  13. Nugroho, R. (2014). Public policy in developing countries. Yogyakarta: Pustaka Pelajar.
  14. Pemerintah Kota Samarinda. (2021). Peraturan Daerah Kota Samarinda Nomor 2 Tahun 2021 tentang Rencana Pembangunan Jangka Menengah Daerah Kota Samarinda Tahun 2021–2026.
  15. Satispi, E., & Mufidayaiti, K. (2019). Public policy: Theory and its application. Jakarta: UMJ Press.
  16. Satori, D., & Komariah, A. (2017). Qualitative research methodology. Bandung: Alfabeta.
  17. Sugiyono. (2018). Educational approach research methods: Quantitative, qualitative, and R&D approaches. Bandung: Alfabeta.
  18. Sujarweni, V. W. (2014). Research methods: Complete, practical, and easy to understand. Yogyakarta: Pustaka Baru Press.
  19. Tahir, A. (2014). Public policy & transparency of implementation of local government. Bandung: Alfabeta.
  20. Wali Kota Samarinda. (2021). Peraturan Wali Kota Samarinda Nomor 12 Tahun 2021 tentang Pedoman Teknis Pelaksanaan Program Pembangunan dan Pemberdayaan Masyarakat (Probebaya).
  21. Wali Kota Samarinda. (2021). Peraturan Wali Kota Samarinda Nomor 46 Tahun 2021 tentang Perubahan atas Peraturan Wali Kota Samarinda Nomor 12 Tahun 2021 tentang Pedoman Teknis Pelaksanaan Program Pembangunan dan Pemberdayaan Masyarakat (Probebaya).
  22. Wali Kota Samarinda. (2022). Peraturan Wali Kota Samarinda Nomor 11 Tahun 2022 tentang Pedoman Teknis Pelaksanaan Program Pembangunan dan Pemberdayaan Masyarakat (Probebaya).
  23. Wali Kota Samarinda. (2022). Peraturan Wali Kota Samarinda Nomor 60 Tahun 2022 tentang Pedoman Pemberian Penghargaan Probebaya.
  24. Winarno, B. (2012). Public policy: Theory, process, and case study. Yogyakarta: PT Buku Seru, CAPS.