Article Sidebar

Download
Download Article

Main Article Content

Abstract

This study aims to evaluate the significant impact of the agricultural and trade sectors on the growth rate of Gross Regional Domestic Product (GRDP) in West Sulawesi from 2017 to 2023. The analysis was conducted using GRDP data at constant prices, which reflects the contribution of each sector to the overall GRDP. Data collection techniques included observation and secondary data retrieval from the BPS website. The data were processed and analyzed using multiple linear regression. The regression analysis results indicate that the agricultural sector has a t-coefficient of 11,665.550 with a significance value of 0.000, while the trade sector has a t-coefficient of 10,678.826 with a significance value of 0.000. These findings confirm that both sectors significantly influence the GRDP growth rate. The F-test results further validate this relationship, showing that the agricultural sector (F-value = 136,085,062.042) and the trade sector (F-value = 114,037,315.965) significantly explain variations in GRDP. Throughout the study period, the agricultural sector's contribution to GRDP remained stable at around 39%, while the trade sector accounted for approximately 10%. However, a decline in contribution observed in 2024 suggests fluctuations that warrant further analysis. These findings highlight the critical role of both sectors in driving economic growth in West Sulawesi.

Keywords

Agriculture Sector Trade Sector Growth Rate of Gross Regional Domestic Product (GRDP)

Article Details

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

Author Biography

Ratna Rahman, Universitas Muhammadiyah Mamuju

Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk mengevaluasi pengaruh signifikan dari sektor pertanian dan sektor perdagangan terhadap laju pertumbuhan Produk Domestik Regional Bruto (PDRB) di Sulawesi Barat selama periode 2017-2023. Analisis dilakukan menggunakan data PDRB atas dasar harga konstan yang menunjukkan kontribusi masing-masing sektor terhadap PDRB. Teknik pengumpulan data meliputi observasi dan pengumpulan data sekunder dari website BPS. Data diolah dan dianalisis dengan regresi linier berganda. Hasil analisis regresi menunjukkan bahwa sektor pertanian memiliki koefisien t sebesar 11.665,550 dengan nilai signifikansi 0.000, sementara sektor perdagangan memiliki koefisien t sebesar 10.678,826 dengan nilai signifikansi 0.000. Ini menegaskan bahwa kedua sektor secara signifikan mempengaruhi laju pertumbuhan PDRB. Uji F juga mengonfirmasi bahwa sektor pertanian (nilai F = 136.085.062,042) dan sektor perdagangan (nilai F = 114.037.315,965) secara signifikan menjelaskan variasi dalam PDRB. Kontribusi sektor pertanian terhadap PDRB stabil di sekitar 39% selama periode penelitian, sedangkan sektor perdagangan menyumbang sekitar 10%. Penurunan kontribusi pada tahun 2024 menunjukkan fluktuasi yang memerlukan analisis lebih lanjut. Temuan ini menggarisbawahi pentingnya kedua sektor dalam pertumbuhan ekonomi Sulawesi Barat.

How to Cite
Fadli Ahmad Aaenal Lipsa, M., Heryati, Y., & Rahman, R. (2024). The Influence of The Agricultural Sector and Trade Sector on The Gross Regional Domestic Product Growth Rate in West Sulawesi in 2017-2023. Golden Ratio of Social Science and Education, 4(2), 208–215. https://doi.org/10.52970/grsse.v4i2.1036
Download Citation
Endnote/Zotero/Mendeley (RIS)
BibTeX

References

  1. Aulia, R. N. (2020). The Effect of the Agricultural Sector and the Trade Sector on the Growth Rate of GRDP in North Sumatra in 2011-2019. In Orphanet Journal of Rare Diseases (Vol. 21, Issue 1). North Sumatra State Islamic University.
  2. Agribusiness Agency, Ministry of Agriculture. 2000. Technical Guidelines for the Development of Agribusiness Sub Terminals. Jakarta.
  3. BPS of West Sulawesi Province, 2024. West Sulawesi Province GRDP Book, 2019-2023.
  4. Dama, H. Y., Lapian, A. L. Ch., & Sumual, J. I. (2016). The Effect of Gross Regional Domestic Product (GRDP) on Poverty Level in Manado city (2005-2014). Journal of Efficiency Scientific Periodicals, 16(3), 549-561.
  5. Iqbal, Muhammad and Sudaryanto, Tahlim. 2018. Corporate Social Responsibility in the Perspective of Agricultural Development Policy. Agricultural Policy Analysis Vol. 6 No. 2. Center for Socio-Economic Analysis and Agricultural Policy Studies. Bogor.
  6. Kuznets, S. (1957). Quantitative Aspects of the Economic Growth of Nations: II. Industrial Distribution of National Product and Labor Force. Economic Development and Cultural Change, 5(4), 1-111.
  7. Kuznets, S. (1966). Modern Economic Growth. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
  8. Lewis, W. A. (2013). Theory of Economic Growth. London: Routledge.
  9. Meier, G. M., & Rauch, J. E. (2000). Leading Issues in Economic Development, Seventh Edition. New York: Oxford University Press.
  10. Mihnenoka, A., & Saulītis, J. (2013). Evaluating the Significance of Structural Changes within the National Economy for Economic Growth of Latvia using the Econometric Model. Economics & Business.
  11. Mi`Rojun Nurun Nadziroh. 2020. The Role of the Agricultural Sector in Economic Growth in Magetan Regency. Agristan Journal. Vol. 2, No. 1.
  12. Myrdal, G. (1971). Economic Theory and Underdeveloped Regions. India Quarterly: A Journal of International Affairs, 16(2), 189-191.
  13. Nasoetion, L. (1991). Engineering the Transformation of Indonesia's Economic Structure to Improve the Efficiency of the Agricultural Sector. Seminar on Agricultural Development in PJP II, Bogor.
  14. Nazara, S. (2005). Input-Output Analysis Second Edition. Jakarta: Publishing House of the Faculty of Economics, University of Indonesia.
  15. Nguyen, H. C. (2018). Empirical Evidence of Structural Change: the Case of Vietnam's Economic Growth. Journal of Southeast Asian Economies, 35(2), 237-256.
  16. Rompas, J., Enka, D., & Tolosang, K. (2015). Potential of agriculture sector and its effect on labor absorption in South Minahasa Regency. Journal of Efficiency Scientific Periodical, 15(4), 124-136.
  17. Soetrisno, N. (2013). Indonesian Cooperatives: Portraits and Challenges. Journal of People's Economy, II(5), Jakarta
  18. Soetrisno, N. (2013). Towards Sustainable Economic Development. Indonesian College of Economics Finance and Banking (STEKPI). Jakarta.
  19. Tambunan, T. H. (2013). The Development of the Agricultural Sector in Indonesia: Some Important Issues. Ghalia Indonesia, Jakarta.
  20. Wahyuningtias, A. D. (2021). Analysis of the influence of the agricultural sector and the trade sector on the gross regional domestic product of Magelang Regency. Journal of Economics Research and Policy Studies, 1(1), 1-11. Available at: https://journal.nurscienceinstitute.id/index.php/jerps
  21. CIPS Indonesia: https://repository.cips-indonesia.org/publications/345661/produktivitas-tanaman-pangan-dan-hortikultura
  22. BPS West Sulawesi: https://sulbar.bps.go.id/news/2020/12/02/77/sektor-pertanian-tulang-punggung-pdrb-sulawesi-barat.html.