Article Sidebar

Download
Download Article

Main Article Content

Abstract

This study investigates how the workplace affects job performance through employees' job engagement at PKU Muhammadiyah Hospital Surabaya. Using a quantitative explanatory methodology, the research utilized Structural Equation Modeling with Partial Least Squares (SEM-PLS), used in this work via SmartPLS software. A structured survey was used to gather information from 141 workers. The findings reveal a positive relationship between workplace romance and job performance, with a path coefficient of 0.132. A positive relationship between workplace romance and job engagement, with a path coefficient of 0.650. There is a positive relationship between job engagement and job performance, with a path coefficient of 0.780. A positive relationship between workplace romance and job performance through job engagement of employees at PKU Muhammadiyah Hospital Surabaya, with a path coefficient of 0.507.

Keywords

Workplace Romance Job Engagement Job Performance Structural Equation Modeling

Article Details

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

How to Cite
Abdalla, P. A. ., & Agustina, T. S. . (2025). The Effect of Workplace Romance on Job Performance Mediated by Job Engagement Among Employees: Case Study From PKU Muhammadiyah Hospital Surabaya, Indonesia. Golden Ratio of Human Resource Management, 5(1), 141–152. https://doi.org/10.52970/grhrm.v5i1.752
Download Citation
Endnote/Zotero/Mendeley (RIS)
BibTeX

References

  1. Chory, R., & Hoke, H. (2020). Coworkers perceptions of and communication with workplace romance participants: proposing and testing a model. International Journal of Business Communication, 1(1), 1-23.
  2. Colquitt. (2011). Organizational Behavior: Improving Performance and Commitment in the Workplace (2nd ed.). New York: McGraw Hill Irwin.
  3. France, B. (2022). Do not get your meat where you get your bread: Beliefs and advice about workplace romance. Behavioral Sciences, 12(278), 1–17.
  4. Ghozali. (2019). Analysis Smart PLS. Semarang: Universitas Diponegoro.
  5. Hung, T., Wang, C., Tian, M., Lin, M., & Liu, W. (2022). How can we prevent stress in the workplace through emotional regulation? The relationship between compulsory citizen behavior, job engagement, and job performance. SAGE Open, 1(1), 1-14.
  6. Ivancevich, J., Konopaske, R., & Matteson, M. (2009). Organizational Behavior & Management. Boston: McGraw-Hill.
  7. Jung, H., & Yoon, H. (2020). How does workplace romance influence team member performance in the hospitality industry? Sustainability Article, 1(2), 1-13.
  8. Khalilzadeh, J., & Pizam, A. (2021). Workplace romance across different industries with a focus on hospitality and leisure. International Journal of Hospitality Management, 9(4), 1-12.
  9. Riyanto, S., & Endri, E. (2021). Effect of work motivation and job satisfaction on employee performance: the mediating role of employee engagement. Problem and Perspectives in Management, 19(3), 162-175.
  10. Robbins, & Judge. (2019). Organization Behavior. Jakarta: PT Salemba Empat.
  11. Saleem, Z., Shenbei, Z., & Hanif, A. (2022). Workplace violence and employee engagement: The mediating role of work environment and organizational culture. SAGE Open, 1(1), 1-15.
  12. Schaufeli, W., & Bakker, A. (2004). Work Engagement Scale. Utrecht : Utrecht University.
  13. Sidhu, A., Nazneen, A., & Bhalla, P. (2020). Impact of workplace romance on organizational setting research. Article in Prabandhan Indian Journal of Management, 4(4), 1-15.
  14. Yan, C., Ni, J., Chien, Y., & Lo, C. (2021). Does workplace friendship promote or hinder hotel employees' work engagement? The role of role ambiguity. Journal of Hospitality and Tourism Management, 4(6), 205-214.
  15. Yandi, A., & Havidz, H. (2022). Employee performance model: work engagement through job satisfaction and organizational commitment (a study of human resource management literature study). Dinasti International Journal of Management Science, 3(3), 547-56