Article Sidebar

Download
Download Article

Main Article Content

Abstract

This study investigates the interrelationships among Psychological Capital, Leader-Member Exchange (LMX), Person-Organization Fit (POF), and Innovative Work Behavior (IWB) within the context of the construction industry in Makassar. The research aims to determine the direct and indirect effects of Psychological Capital and LMX on POF and, subsequently, on IWB among employees. Specifically, the study poses the following research questions: (1) Does Psychological Capital influence Person-Organization Fit among construction company employees? (2) What is the impact of Leader-Member Exchange on Person-Organization Fit in this setting? (3) How do Psychological Capital and Leader-Member Exchange directly affect Innovative Work Behavior? (4) Do Psychological Capital and Leader-Member Exchange indirectly influence Innovative Work Behavior through Person-Organization Fit? The significance of this research lies in its potential to enhance understanding of key human resource constructs and their interplay, which could inform the development of HR management practices. Moreover, the findings are expected to provide actionable insights for construction companies aiming to foster a culture of innovation among their workforce. The methodology encompasses the collection of primary data from 397 employees across various construction companies, employing proportional stratified random sampling to select 199 respondents based on the Slovin Formula with a 5% precision level. Path analysis is conducted using the AMOS 24 software to analyze the data. The anticipated outcomes of this research include the establishment of significant relationships between Psychological Capital and both Person-Organization Fit and Innovative Work Behavior, as well as between Leader-Member Exchange and Person-Organization Fit. Furthermore, the study seeks to explore whether Psychological Capital and Leader-Member Exchange can enhance Innovative Work Behavior mediated by Person-Organization Fit. The results aim to contribute both theoretically to academic discourse and practically as a resource for organizational development in the construction sector.

Keywords

Psychological Capital Leader-Member Exchange (LMX) Person-Organization Fit Innovative Work Behavior Human Resource Management

Article Details

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

How to Cite
Purnama, I. R., AC, A. ., & Rendra Anggoro, Y. A. . (2024). Strengthening Person Organization Fit and Innovative Work Behavior Through Psychological Capital and Leader-Member Exchange. Golden Ratio of Human Resource Management, 4(2), 215–229. https://doi.org/10.52970/grhrm.v4i2.458
Download Citation
Endnote/Zotero/Mendeley (RIS)
BibTeX

References

  1. Ababneh, O. M. A. (2022). How can human capital promote innovative behavior? exploring the attitudinal dynamics of employee engagement and mental involvement. The International Journal of Entrepreneurship and Innovation, 146575032211234–146575032211234. https://doi.org/10.1177/14657503221123405
  2. Afsar, B., Al-Ghazali, B. M., Cheema, S., & Javed, F. (2021). Cultural intelligence and innovative work behavior: the role of work engagement and interpersonal trust. European Journal of Innovation Management, 24(4), 1082–1109. https://doi.org/10.1108/EJIM-01-2020-0008
  3. Afsar, B., Cheema, S., & Saeed, B. Bin. (2018). Do nurses display innovative work behavior when their values match with hospitals’ values? European Journal of Innovation Management, 21(1), 157–171. https://doi.org/10.1108/EJIM-01-2017-0007
  4. Akinci, G., Alpkan, L., Yildiz, B., & Karacay, G. (2022). The Link between Ambidextrous Leadership and Innovative Work Behavior in a Military Organization: The Mediating Role of Climate for Innovation. Sustainability, 14(22), 15315. https://doi.org/10.3390/su142215315
  5. Al-Ghazali, B. M., & Afsar, B. (2022). Impact of psychological capital on mental health, readiness for organizational change, and job insecurity: hotel employees’ perspective in COVID-19. Journal of Tourism Futures. https://doi.org/10.1108/jtf-07-2020-0116
  6. AlEssa, H. S., & Durugbo, C. (2022). Understanding innovative work behaviour of women in service firms. Service Business, 16(4), 825–862. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11628-022-00501-z
  7. Alola, U. V., & Atsa’am, D. D. (2020). Measuring employees’ psychological capital using data mining approach. Journal of Public Affairs, 20(2). https://doi.org/10.1002/PA.2050
  8. Álvarez, D. G., Soler, M. J. G., Cobo-Rendón, R., & Hernández-Lalinde, J. (2022). Positive Psychology Applied to Education in Practicing Teachers during the COVID-19 Pandemic: Personal Resources, Well-Being, and Teacher Training. Sustainability, 14(18), 11728. https://doi.org/10.3390/su141811728
  9. Andriani, E. (2023). Optimism as the Base of Economic Revival. Journal of Social Research, 2(1). https://doi.org/10.55324/josr.v2i1.843
  10. Asghar, M., & Minichiello, A. (2022). Two sides to every psyche: Implications of positive psychology for “mental health” research in engineering education. Journal of Engineering Education, 112(1), 12–17. https://doi.org/10.1002/jee.20493
  11. Assen, M. F. van, & Caniëls, M. C. J. (2022). Economic and social LMX and innovative work behaviour: the moderating effect of paradox mindset. European Journal of Innovation Management, 25(6), 1057–1075. https://doi.org/10.1108/ejim-05-2022-0234
  12. Banda-Castro, A. L. (2023). Capital psicológico que influye a la motivación intrínseca de universitarios del noroeste de México. Interdisciplinaria, 40(2). https://doi.org/10.16888/interd.2023.40.2.10
  13. Bartlett, R. (2023). The Power of the General Factor of Personality: Incremental Validity over the Big Five in Predicting Innovativeness and Life Satisfaction. https://doi.org/10.31234/osf.io/3ct5z
  14. Batool, I., Khan, M. Z., & Tariq, S. (2023). Development and Validation of Psychological Capital Scale for Dual Role Individuals: Further Evidence of Psychometric Properties. https://doi.org/10.52053/jpap.v4i2.163
  15. Battistelli, A., Meneghel, I., & Salanova, M. (2023). Psychological Capital, Autonomous Motivation and Innovative Behavior: A Study Aimed at Employees in Social Networks. Psychological Reports, 332941231183614–332941231183614. https://doi.org/10.1177/00332941231183614
  16. Björklund, T., Gilmartin, S. K., & Sheppard, S. (2022). The dynamics of innovation efforts in the early career. Creativity and Innovation Management, 32(1), 80–99. https://doi.org/10.1111/caim.12534
  17. Bysted, R. (2013). Innovative employee behaviour. European Journal of Innovation Management, 16(3), 268–284. https://doi.org/10.1108/EJIM-09-2011-0069
  18. Channuwong, S. (2023). Human resource management and organizational performance. International Journal of Advanced Research, 11(05), 872–881. https://doi.org/10.21474/ijar01/16940
  19. Chen, C.-C. (2023). Beware of separating from the majority: the influence of leader-member exchange (LMX) relational separation on individual creativity. Leadership & Organization Development Journal. https://doi.org/10.1108/lodj-06-2021-0263
  20. Colladon, A. F., Toschi, L., Ughetto, E., & Greco, F. (2022). The language and social behavior of innovators. Journal of Business Research, abs/2209.09511, 113317. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2022.113317
  21. Costa, G. G., Bortoluzzi, G., & Černe, M. (2022). Can innovative work behaviour spur creativity while working remotely? The role of work–home conflict and social isolation. Management Research Review. https://doi.org/10.1108/mrr-03-2022-0204
  22. Dani, M. V., & Gandhi, A. (2021). Understanding the drivers of innovation in an organization: a literature review. International Journal of Innovation Science. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJIS-10-2020-0201
  23. Dar, N., Kundi, Y. M., & Soomro, S. A. (2023). Leader–member exchange and innovative work behavior: a 2-1-1 model. Management Decision. https://doi.org/10.1108/md-08-2022-1113
  24. Dóci, E., Spruyt, B., Moortel, D. De, Vanroelen, C., & Hoffman, J. (2023). In Search of the Social in Psychological Capital: Integrating Psychological Capital into a Broader Capital Framework. Review of General Psychology, 108926802311587–108926802311587. https://doi.org/10.1177/10892680231158791
  25. Dzimidienė, A., & Bagdziuniene, D. (2022). The Effect of Employee Agility and Self-Efficacy on Innovative Behavior at Work. Psichologija, 67, 70–88. https://doi.org/10.15388/psichol.2022.60
  26. Flocco, N., Canterino, F., & Cagliano, R. (2022). To control or not to control: How to organize employee‐driven innovation. Creativity and Innovation Management, 31(3), 396–409. https://doi.org/10.1111/caim.12500
  27. Garland, J., Berdahl, A., Berdahl, A., Sun, J., & Bollt, E. M. (2018). Anatomy of leadership in collective behaviour. Chaos, 28(7), 75308. https://doi.org/10.1063/1.5024395
  28. Garud, R., Tuertscher, P., & Ven, A. H. Van de. (2013). Perspectives on Innovation Processes. The Academy of Management Annals, 7(1), 775–819. https://doi.org/10.1080/19416520.2013.791066
  29. Ha, J. (2022). Capturing Emerging Business Opportunities through Entrepreneurial Orientation and Innovation Behavior: The Moderating Role of Leader-Member Exchange. Sustainability, 14(6), 3585. https://doi.org/10.3390/su14063585
  30. Hu, C. (2023). Study on the relationship between innovation self-efficacy and innovation behavior. 2(1), 89–93. https://doi.org/10.54097/ajmss.v2i1.6377
  31. Inków, M. (2020). Organizational innovation capability due to knowledge management processes - a literature review. Management Science, 24(1), 143–156. https://doi.org/10.2478/MANMENT-2019-0040
  32. Isselbacher, E. M., Preventza, O. A., Black, J. H., Augoustides, J. G. T., Beck, A. W., Bolen, M. A., Braverman, A. C., Bray, B. E., Brown-Zimmerman, M. M., Chen, E. P., Collins, T. J., DeAnda, A., Fanola, C. L., Girardi, L. N., Hicks, C. W., Hui, D. S., Jones, W. S., Kalahasti, V., Kim, K. M., … Woo, Y. J. (2022). 2022 ACC/AHA Guideline for the Diagnosis and Management of Aortic Disease: A Report of the American Heart Association/American College of Cardiology Joint Committee on Clinical Practice Guidelines. Circulation. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1161/CIR.0000000000001106
  33. Jansen, J. J. P., Heavey, C., Mom, T., Simsek, Z., & Zahra, S. A. (2023). Scaling‐up: Building, leading and sustaining rapid growth over time. Journal of Management Studies, 60(3), 581–604. https://doi.org/10.1111/joms.12910
  34. Jaya, W. K., Hadna, A. H., & Sumaryono, S. (2023). The Effect of Authentic Leadership on Innovative Work Behavior Mediated by Work Meaningfulness. Journal of Psychology & Behavioral Studies, 3(2), 1–7. https://doi.org/10.32996/jpbs.2023.3.2.1
  35. Junjunan, I. M., & Putra, A. G. E. (2023). Psychological Capital: Perkembangannya dalam sepuluh tahun terakhir. 19(1), 186–196. https://doi.org/10.37278/insearch.v20i1.624
  36. Karimi, S., Malek, F. A., Farani, A. Y., & Liobikiene, G. (2023). The Role of Transformational Leadership in Developing Innovative Work Behaviors: The Mediating Role of Employees’ Psychological Capital. Sustainability, 15(2), 1267. https://doi.org/10.3390/su15021267
  37. Kariri, H. D. H., & Radwan, O. (2023). The Influence of Psychological Capital on Individual’s Social Responsibility through the Pivotal Role of Psychological Empowerment: A Study Towards a Sustainable Workplace Environment. Sustainability, 15(3), 2720. https://doi.org/10.3390/su15032720
  38. Knight, K. E. (1965). Some general organizational factors that influence innovative behavior. IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management, 1, 2–8. https://doi.org/10.1109/TEM.1965.6446432
  39. Kristof-Brown, A. L., Schneider, B., & Su, R. (2023). Person‐Organization Fit Theory and Research: Conundrums, Conclusions, and Calls to Action. Personnel Psychology. https://doi.org/10.1111/peps.12581
  40. Lan, J., Huo, Y., Wong, I. A., & Yuan, B. (2023). How (in) leader–follower learning goal orientation congruence influences leader–member exchange and employee innovation. International Journal of Contemporary Hospitality Management. https://doi.org/10.1108/ijchm-02-2022-0262
  41. Lee, K., Kim, Y.-S., & Shin, H. C. (2022). The Effect of Personal Environment Suitability and Work Environment of Luxury Hotels on Psychological Capital and Innovation Behavior. Sustainability, 14(12), 7074. https://doi.org/10.3390/su14127074
  42. Lin, W., Yin, H., & Liu, Z. (2022). The roles of transformational leadership and growth mindset in teacher professional development: The mediation of teacher self-efficacy. Sustainability, 14(11), 6489.
  43. Liu, H., Xu, F., & Wu, C. (2023). The role of synergistic interplay among LMX, leader creativity expectations and job characteristics in stimulating creative process engagement. Management Decision, 61(3), 610–636. https://doi.org/10.1108/md-08-2021-1113
  44. Madhavan, V., Venugopalan, M., Gupta, B., & Sisodia, G. S. (2023). Addressing Agency Problem in Employee Training: The Role of Goal Congruence. Sustainability, 15(4), 3745. https://doi.org/10.3390/su15043745
  45. Martin, R. L., Ono, M. B., Legood, A., Russo, S. Dello, & Thomas, G. (2023). Leader-member exchange (LMX) quality and follower well-being: A daily diary study. Journal of Occupational Health Psychology, 28 2(2), 103–116. https://doi.org/10.1037/ocp0000346
  46. Martínez-Costa, M., Jiménez-Jiménez, D., & Rabeh, H. A. D. (2019). The effect of organisational learning on interorganisational collaborations in innovation: an empirical study in SMEs. Knowledge Management Research & Practice, 17(2), 137–150. https://doi.org/10.1080/14778238.2018.1538601
  47. Montani, F., Odoardi, C., & Battistelli, A. (2014). Individual and contextual determinants of innovative work behaviour: Proactive goal generation matters. Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology, 87(4), 645–670. https://doi.org/10.1111/JOOP.12066
  48. Morquin, D., Ologeanu-Taddei, R., Paré, G., & Wagner, G. (2023). A method for resolving organisation‐enterprise system misfits: An action research study in a pluralistic organisation. Information Systems Journal. https://doi.org/10.1111/isj.12433
  49. Mothe, C., Nguyen-Thi, U. T., & Nguyen-Van, P. (2015). Complementarities in organizational innovation practices: evidence from French industrial firms*. Economics of Innovation and New Technology, 24(6), 569–595. https://doi.org/10.1080/10438599.2014.949416
  50. Mrayyan, M. T. (2022). A comparative study of clinical leadership needs analysis (CLeeNa) as perceived by nurses. Journal of Clinical Nursing, 31(19–20), 2754–2764. https://doi.org/10.1111/jocn.16089
  51. Mussner, T., Strobl, A., Veider, V., & Matzler, K. (2017). The effect of work ethic on employees’ individual innovation behavior. Creativity and Innovation Management, 26(4), 391–406. https://doi.org/10.1111/CAIM.12243
  52. Nefedova, A. I., Chernysheva, M. V, Kuzina, L. S., & Yudin, I. B. (2022). Workplace innovation: Employee characteristics and organizational context. Voprosy Economiki, 9, 73–92. https://doi.org/10.32609/0042-8736-2022-9-73-92
  53. Ostlund, L. E. (1973). Factor analysis applied to predictors of innovative behavior. Decision Sciences, 4(1), 92–108. https://doi.org/10.1111/J.1540-5915.1973.TB01708.X
  54. Rafique, N. M., Afshan, G., & Ahmed, F. J. (2023). Role of authentic leadership in enhancing employees’ voice behavior through psychological capital during COVID-19 pandemic. Asia-Pacific Journal of Business Administration. https://doi.org/10.1108/apjba-04-2022-0156
  55. Rawat, R., Mahapatra, M., & Bhardwaj, G. (2022). Role of optimism in attitude towards self. International Journal of Health Sciences (IJHS), 1929–1936. https://doi.org/10.53730/ijhs.v6ns6.10052
  56. Resch, S. C. (2023). Person–Skill Fit: Why a New Form of Employee Fit Is Required. Academy of Management Perspectives, 37(2), 117–137. https://doi.org/10.5465/amp.2022.0024
  57. Restuningsih, M. A., Nyoman, D., & Sudiana, N. (2017). Kemampuan Membaca Kritis Ditinjau Dari Kemampuan Berpikir Kritis Dan Minat Membaca Pada Siswa Kelas V Sd Kristen Harapan Denpasar. PENDASI: Jurnal Pendidikan Dasar Indonesia, 1(1), 45–54. https://doi.org/10.23887/jpdi.v1i1.2680
  58. Saksena, N. K. (2023). School Psychology: A Positive Psychology Approach. Mind & Society, 11(04), 9–17. https://doi.org/10.56011/mind-mri-114-20221
  59. Senyk, Y. I. (2023). Using lean methods as an example of kaizen. Economic Scope. https://doi.org/10.32782/2224-6282/183-9
  60. Sethi, D., Pereira, V., Chakraborty, T., & Arya, V. (2023). The impact of leader-member exchange, perceived organizational support, and readiness for change on job crafting behaviours in HRM in an emerging market. International Journal of Human Resource Management, 1–30. https://doi.org/10.1080/09585192.2023.2189021
  61. Sigala, M., & Kyriakidou, O. (2015). Creativity and innovation in the service sector. Service Industries Journal, 35(6), 297–302. https://doi.org/10.1080/02642069.2015.1010159
  62. Singh, S. N. (2023). Creativity: Mining of Innovative Thinking Using Educational Data. 445–449. https://doi.org/10.1109/ICDT57929.2023.10150690
  63. Smith, K. (2023). Bad Employees: Examining Deviant Security Behaviors. Journal of Computer Information Systems, 1–14. https://doi.org/10.1080/08874417.2023.2175336
  64. Steed, A., Slater, M., Sadagic, A., Bullock, A., & Tromp, J. G. (1999). Leadership and collaboration in shared virtual environments. 112–115. https://doi.org/10.1109/VR.1999.756941
  65. Stevens, M., & Thevissen, F. (2023). A Kaizen Event Enabled by System Engineering in an Infrastructure Project. https://doi.org/10.24928/2023/0113
  66. Subramanian, S., Billsberry, J., & Barrett, M. (2022). A bibliometric analysis of person-organization fit research: significant features and contemporary trends. Management Review Quarterly. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11301-022-00290-9
  67. Sung, W., & Kim, C. (2021). A Study on the Effect of Change Management on Organizational Innovation: Focusing on the Mediating Effect of Members’ Innovative Behavior. Sustainability, 13(4), 2079. https://doi.org/10.3390/SU13042079
  68. Supriyadi, D., & Martini, N. (2023). Manajemen Sumber Daya Manusia dalam Lembaga Pendidikan. Jurnal Manajemen Dan Sains, 8(1), 450. https://doi.org/10.33087/jmas.v8i1.776
  69. Syaputra, M. J., & Aisyah, S. (2022). Kaizen Method Implementation in Industries: Literature Review and Research Issues. IJIEM (Indonesian Journals of Industrial Engineering and Management), 3(2), 116. https://doi.org/10.22441/ijiem.v3i2.15408
  70. Theresia, L., Sudri, N. M., & Mauliddina, Y. (2023). Relationship Between Kaizen, Employees Work and Quality of Service A PLS-SEM Approach. Proceedings of the International Conference on Industrial Engineering and Operations Management. https://doi.org/10.46254/ap03.20220143
  71. Tolić, I., Sabljic, D. B., & Sabljić, T. (2022). Innovation as a process. Apeiron, 23(1). https://doi.org/10.7251/emc2201237t
  72. Treviño, L. J., Egri, C. P., Ralston, D. A., Naoumova, I., Li, Y., Darder, F. L., Carranza, M. T. de la G., & Furrer, O. (2020). A Cross-Cultural Examination of Person-Organization Fit: Is P-O Fit Congruent with or Contingent on Societal Values? Management International Review, 60(2), 287–314. https://doi.org/10.1007/S11575-020-00411-0
  73. Tyler, T. R. (2002). Leadership and Cooperation in Groups. American Behavioral Scientist, 45(5), 769–782. https://doi.org/10.1177/0002764202045005003
  74. Ullah, I., Hameed, R. M., & Mahmood, A. (2023). The impact of proactive personality and psychological capital on innovative work behavior: evidence from software houses of Pakistan. European Journal of Innovation Management. https://doi.org/10.1108/ejim-01-2022-0022
  75. Verger, J. (2023). Management innovation: The role of internal, external factors, and business group affiliation. Journal of Business Research, 164, 113964. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2023.113964
  76. Vieira, J. P. P., Etges, B. M. B. da S., Pellegrino, R. A., Lins, M. A., & Costa, L. L. (2022). Kaizen as an Improvement Method for Concrete Walls Construction in Social Housing Project. Annual Conference of the International Group for Lean Construction. https://doi.org/10.24928/2022/0136
  77. Wada, M., Μάστακας, Κ., & Kumar, V. (2023). Optimism and mental health (pp. 692–697). https://doi.org/10.1016/b978-0-323-91497-0.00194-6
  78. Wang, H., Jiang, L., Xu, X., Zhou, K., & Bauer, T. N. (2022). Dynamic relationships between leader–member exchange and employee role-making behaviours: The moderating role of employee emotional ambivalence. Human Relations, 76, 926–951. https://doi.org/10.1177/00187267221075253
  79. Wawersik, D., Boutin, E., Gore, T. N., & Palaganas, J. C. (2023). Individual Characteristics That Promote or Prevent Psychological Safety and Error Reporting in Healthcare: A Systematic Review. Journal of Healthcare Leadership, 15, 59–70. https://doi.org/10.2147/JHL.S369242
  80. Wijngaarden, Y., Hitters, E., & Bhansing, P. V. (2019). ‘Innovation is a dirty word’: contesting innovation in the creative industries. International Journal of Cultural Policy, 25(3), 1–14. https://doi.org/10.1080/10286632.2016.1268134
  81. Wörsdörfer, A. I. (2022). Elucidating the effects of organisational practices on innovative work behavior in UAE public sector organisations: The mediating role of employees’ wellbeing. Applied Psychology: Health and Well-Being, 14(3), 715–733. https://doi.org/10.1111/aphw.12343
  82. Wrenn, M. V. (2023). Overcoming Optimism (and Moving toward Hope). Journal of Economic Issues, 57(2), 376–388. https://doi.org/10.1080/00213624.2023.2188869
  83. Wu, J., Hou, Z., Shen, J., & Lian, Z. (2021). A method for the determination of optimal indoor environmental parameters range considering work performance. Journal of Building Engineering, 35, 101976. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.JOBE.2020.101976
  84. Xie, C. P. (2023). How Person–Organization Fit Impacts Work Performance: Evidence from Researchers in Ten Countries during the COVID-19. Sustainability, 15(13), 9866. https://doi.org/10.3390/su15139866
  85. Yuan, F., & Woodman, R. W. (2010). Innovative Behavior in the Workplace: The Role of Performance and Image Outcome Expectations. Academy of Management Journal, 53(2), 323–342. https://doi.org/10.5465/AMJ.2010.49388995
  86. Zheng, J., Gu, Y., Wang, Y., & Xie, H. (2022). Exchange Relationships and Helping Behavior: An Empirical Analysis of Data from CGSS2015. Psychology Research and Behavior Management, 15, 2011–2025. https://doi.org/10.2147/PRBM.S376464
  87. Zhou, X., Wang, Y., Zhang, X., & Li, L. (2023). The Influence of Decision-Making Logic on Employees’ Innovative Behaviour: The Mediating Role of Positive Error Orientation and the Moderating Role of Environmental Dynamics. Psychology Research and Behavior Management, 16, 2297–2313. https://doi.org/10.2147/PRBM.S416595
  88. Zuberi, M. A., & Khattak, A. (2021). Impact of proactive personality and leader member exchange on innovative work behavior: a job design perspective. International Journal of Innovation Science, 13(5), 664–683. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJIS-11-2020-0251