Article Sidebar

Download
Download Article

Main Article Content

Abstract

The aim of this study is to analyze the effects of complexity knowledge and systems thinking on knowledge hiding, with psychological ownership serving as a mediating variable in private banking services in Central Jakarta. Knowledge hiding represents a critical issue in the banking industry, as highly competitive and stressful work environments may encourage employees to intentionally conceal knowledge, thereby inhibiting cooperation and organizational performance. This study employs a quantitative research design with a hypothesis-testing approach. Data were collected through online questionnaires distributed to 160 respondents selected using purposive sampling. The research instrument was developed and validated through reliability and validity testing. Data analysis was conducted using Structural Equation Modeling (SEM) with AMOS software, while mediation effects were examined using the Sobel test. Model adequacy was confirmed through goodness-of-fit testing. The findings indicate that complexity knowledge and systems thinking significantly influence knowledge hiding, both directly and indirectly through psychological ownership. These results enhance understanding of how cognitive and psychological factors shape knowledge-related behaviors in private banking organizations. To mitigate knowledge hiding, management is encouraged to strengthen a culture of knowledge sharing by developing systems thinking capabilities, managing job complexity more transparently, and fostering a collective sense of psychological ownership among employees. Future research is recommended to expand the research context and incorporate additional organizational variables to develop a more comprehensive model.

Keywords

Complexity Knowledge System Thinking Psychological Ownership Knowledge Hiding

Article Details

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

How to Cite
Surbakti, G. G. S., Emilisa, N., Cika, C., & Said, M. N. (2026). The Influence of Complexity Knowledge and System Thinking on Knowledge Hiding Mediation Psychological Ownership in Private Banking. Golden Ratio of Human Resource Management, 6(1), 270–285. https://doi.org/10.52970/grhrm.v6i1.1919
Download Citation
Endnote/Zotero/Mendeley (RIS)
BibTeX

References

  1. Abu Khalaf, B., & Awad, A. B. (2024). Exploring the bearing of liquidity risk in the Middle East and North Africa (MENA) banks. Cogent Economics and Finance, 12(1). https://doi.org/10.1080/23322039.2024.2330840
  2. Arrayyan, H., Syaputra, I. N., Hibatullah, S. A., Emilisa, N., Manajemen, P. S., Ekonomi, F., Bisnis, D., & Trisakti, U. (2024). Factors affecting innovative work behavior of private banking employees in jakarta faktor-faktor yang mempengaruhi innovative work behavior terhadap karyawan perbankan swasta di jakarta. Journal of Social and Economics Research, 6(2). https://idm.or.id/JSER/index.
  3. Audretsch, D. B., & Belitski, M. (2024). Knowledge collaboration, firm productivity and innovation: A critical assessment. Journal of Business Research, 172. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2023.114412
  4. Batool, F., Mohammad, J., Awang, S. R., & Ahmad, T. (2023). The effect of knowledge sharing and systems thinking on organizational sustainability: the mediating role of creativity. Journal of Knowledge Management, 27(5), 1251–1278. https://doi.org/10.1108/JKM-10-2021-0785
  5. Bratianu, C., Mocanu, R., Stanescu, D. F., & Bejinaru, R. (2023). The Impact of Knowledge Hiding on Entrepreneurial Orientation: The Mediating Role of Factual Autonomy. Sustainability (Switzerland), 15(17). https://doi.org/10.3390/su151713057
  6. Broekel, T., Knuepling, L., & Mewes, L. (2023). Boosting, sorting and complexity - urban scaling of innovation around the world. Journal of Economic Geography, 23(5), 979–1016. https://doi.org/10.1093/jeg/lbad006
  7. Cabrera, D., Cabrera, L., & Cabrera, E. (2022). Systems Organize Information in Mind and Nature: Empirical Findings of Part-Whole Systems (S) in Cognitive and Material Complexity. Systems, 10(2). https://doi.org/10.3390/systems10020044
  8. Cao, Y. (2022). Effect of Interpersonal Injustice on Knowledge Hiding Behavior: Moderating Role of High-Performance Work Stress. Frontiers in Psychology, 13. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2022.858669
  9. Cruz-Bohorquez, J. M., Adams, S. G., & Bravo, F. A. (2024). The Academic System Influence on Instructional Change: A Conceptual Systems Dynamics Model of Faculty Motivation to Adopt Research-Based Instructional Strategies (RBIS). Education Sciences, 14(5). https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci14050544
  10. Dion, D. S., Emilisa, N., & Citra, F. L. (2022). Pengaruh Knowledge Hiding, Psychological Distress, Psychological Stress terhadap Job Performance Pegawai RSJ. Studi Ilmu Manajemen Dan Organisasi, 3(2), 287–301. https://doi.org/10.35912/simo.v3i2.1296
  11. Ghani, U., Teo, T., Li, Y., Usman, M., Islam, Z. U., Gul, H., Naeem, R. M., Bahadar, H., Yuan, J., & Zhai, X. (2020). Tit for tat: Abusive supervision and knowledge hiding-the role of psychological contract breach and psychological ownership. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 17(4). https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph17041240
  12. Gustina, A., & Sitalaksmi, S. (2023). The effect of psychological ownership on knowledge hiding in the banking industry: The role of affective and continuance commitment. International Journal of Knowledge Management Studies, 14(3), 237–254. https://doi.org/10.1504/IJKMS.2023.132038
  13. Hang, N. N. T., & Kim, N. N. (2025). The Impact of Knowledge Complexity, Distrust, Psychological Ownership on Knowledge Hiding Behavior. Electronic Journal of Knowledge Management, 23(1), 119–129. https://doi.org/10.34190/ejkm.23.1.3832
  14. Hapsari, B. B., Netania Emilisa, Tiara Puspa, Fitriyani, & Amalia Rosdiana. (2025). Pengaruh Keamanan Kerja Dan Kepemimpinan Transformasional Terhadap Kinerja Karyawan Di Perusahaan Perbankan Swasta: Peran Mediasi Komitmen OrganisaSI. Media Riset Bisnis & Manajemen, 24(2), 125–140. https://doi.org/10.25105/mrbm.v24i2.22839
  15. Hou, T., Li, J. J., & Lin, J. (2023). Linking knowledge search to knowledge creation: the intermediate role of knowledge complexity. Management Decision, 61(5), 1156–1182. https://doi.org/10.1108/MD-01-2022-0025
  16. Hsieh, M. J., & Chiu, S. K. (2024). Innovative Thinking in Volunteer Organizations: Addressing the Impact of Psychological Ownership on Volunteer Organizational Commitment. Systems, 12(7). https://doi.org/10.3390/systems12070228
  17. Iqbal, O., Ali, Z., & Azam, A. (2022). Exploring the Underlying Mechanism Between Perceived Injustice and Knowledge Hiding: An Empirical Investigation. Psychology Research and Behavior Management, 15, 3683–3697. https://doi.org/10.2147/PRBM.S392249
  18. Jing, J., & Yan, J. (2022). Study on the Effect of Employees’ Perceived Organizational Support, Psychological Ownership, and Turnover Intention: A Case of China’s Employee. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 19(10). https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph19106016
  19. Kunc, M. (2024). The Systems Thinking Approach to Strategic Management. Systems, 12(6). https://doi.org/10.3390/systems12060213
  20. Lee, S., Yang, X., Kim, J., & Byun, G. (2022). Effects of Motivational Climate on Knowledge Hiding: The Mediating Role of Work Alienation. Behavioral Sciences, 12(3). https://doi.org/10.3390/bs12030081
  21. Li, Y., & Shen, M. (2025). How the Complexity of Knowledge Influences Carbon Lock-In. Sustainability (Switzerland), 17(7). https://doi.org/10.3390/su17072985
  22. Malhotra, G., Jham, V., & Sehgal, N. (2022). Does Psychological Ownership Matter? Investigating Consumer Green Brand Relationships through the Lens of Anthropomorphism. Sustainability (Switzerland), 14(20). https://doi.org/10.3390/su142013152
  23. Mandiri di Jakarta Selatan Faiz Lutfan Nadir Rosady, B., Abdul Aziz, M., Athallah Zayyan, I., & Emilisa, N. (2024). Faktor-Faktor yang Mempengaruhi Work Engagement pada Supervisor. Netania Emilisa INNOVATIVE: Journal Of Social Science Research, 4, 8590–8609.
  24. Monat, J., Amissah, M., & Gannon, T. (2020). Practical applications of systems thinking to business. Systems, 8(2), 1–19. https://doi.org/10.3390/systems8020014
  25. Morewedge, C. K., Monga, A., Palmatier, R. W., Shu, S. B., & Small, D. A. (2021). Evolution of Consumption: A Psychological Ownership Framework. Journal of Marketing, 85(1), 196–218. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022242920957007
  26. Nguyen, M., Sharma, P., & Malik, A. (2024). Leadership styles and employee creativity: the interactive impact of online knowledge sharing and organizational innovation. Journal of Knowledge Management, 28(3), 631–650. https://doi.org/10.1108/JKM-01-2023-0014
  27. Putra, A. H. P. K., Rahmi, R., & Laisila, M. (2023). Unlocking the Symphony of Innovation: Weaving Knowledge Management into Organizational Performance. Golden Ratio of Mapping Idea and Literature Format, 3(2), 76–103. https://doi.org/10.52970/grmilf.v3i2.323
  28. Sandi, A. K., Sanjaya, V. F., & Kurniawan, A. (2025). The Impact of Customer Relationship Management on Repurchase Decisions During the Boycott of Israeli Products: The Moderating Role of Knowledge. Golden Ratio of Marketing and Applied Psychology of Business, 6(1), 40–49. https://doi.org/10.52970/grmapb.v6i1.1252
  29. Styvans Dion, D., Emilisa, N., Laddyana Citra, F., Studi Manajemen, P., & Trisakti Jakarta, U. (2022). Studi Ilmu Manajemen dan Organisasi (SIMO) Pengaruh Knowledge Hiding, Psychological Distress, Psychological Stress terhadap Job Performance Pegawai RSJ (The Influence of Knowledge Hiding, Psychological Distress, Psychological Stress on Job Performance of RSJ Employees). 3(2), 287–301. https://doi.org/10.35912/simo.v3i2.1296
  30. Su, X., & Chen, C. (2023). The Influence of Workplace Envy on Employees’ Knowledge-Hiding Behavior Based on a Comparative Analysis between Generation Cohorts. Behavioral Sciences, 13(9). https://doi.org/10.3390/bs13090716
  31. Sulistiawan, J., Moslehpour, M., Diana, F., & Lin, P. K. (2022). Why and When Do Employees Hide Their Knowledge? Behavioral Sciences, 12(2). https://doi.org/10.3390/bs12020056
  32. Sustiyatik, E., & Jauhari, T. (2025). Organizational injustice and workplace deviance: The mediating role of employee jealousy in manufacturing and service sectors. Annals of Human Resource Management Research, 5(3), 667–679. https://doi.org/10.35912/ahrmr.v5i3.2936
  33. Tang, Y., Zhu, H. M., & Du, X. (2022). An analysis of the trickle-down effect of supervisor knowledge hiding on subordinate knowledge hiding based on displaced aggression theory. Frontiers in Psychology, 13. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2022.1002277
  34. Tao, Z., & Sun, J. (2025). Systems Thinking and Entrepreneurial Persistence Among Technology Entrepreneurs in China. Systems, 13(8). https://doi.org/10.3390/systems13080626
  35. Thelen, J., Sant Fruchtman, C., Bilal, M., Gabaake, K., Iqbal, S., Keakabetse, T., Kwamie, A., Mokalake, E., Mupara, L. M., Seitio-Kgokgwe, O., Zafar, S., & Cobos Muñoz, D. (2023). Development of the Systems Thinking for Health Actions framework: a literature review and a case study. BMJ Global Health, 8(3). https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjgh-2022-010191
  36. Tian, Y., Mao, L., Zhou, M., & Cao, Q. (2021). Knowledge-based psychological ownership and knowledge hiding: The roles of loss of knowledge power and emotional intelligence. In Social Behavior and Personality (Vol. 49, Issue 8). Scientific Journal Publishers. https://doi.org/10.2224/sbp.10530
  37. Wang, Y., Liu, X., & Choi, S. (2025). The Moderating Role of Psychological Ownership in Job Crafting, Organizational Commitment, and Innovative Behavior: A Comparison Between AI and Non-AI Departments. Behavioral Sciences, 15(7). https://doi.org/10.3390/bs15070937
  38. Xia, Q., Yan, S., Li, H., Duan, K., & Zhang, Y. (2022). A Bibliometric Analysis of Knowledge-Hiding Research. In Behavioral Sciences (Vol. 12, Issue 5). MDPI. https://doi.org/10.3390/bs12050122
  39. Zhang, W., Leng, S., & Ran, H. (2025). Trusted to share or tempted to hoard? Unpacking employee knowledge hiding through the interplay of leader trust and knowledge psychological ownership. Frontiers in Psychology, 16. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2025.1659249