Main Article Content

Abstract

This study examines how the implementation of PSAK 73 on leases and PSAK 71 on financial instruments affects financial reporting transparency, risk management, and reporting quality. The study applies a descriptive qualitative design through an integrative literature review of accounting standards, peer-reviewed journal articles, and relevant academic literature. The findings show that PSAK 73 improves reporting transparency by requiring the recognition of right-of-use assets and lease liabilities, thereby reducing the potential for off-balance-sheet financing and providing a more complete representation of lease obligations. PSAK 71 improves the relevance and timeliness of credit risk information through the expected credit loss model, which requires entities to incorporate historical data, current conditions, and forward-looking economic information. However, both standards create substantial reporting complexity. PSAK 73 requires entities to determine lease terms, discount rates, contract modifications, and the present value of lease payments. PSAK 71 requires the estimation of probability of default, loss given default, exposure at default, and macroeconomic scenarios. Effective implementation therefore depends on reliable accounting information systems, high-quality data, strong internal controls, cross-functional coordination, and sound professional judgment. Practically, companies need to strengthen contract databases, credit risk models, employee competence, and governance procedures. This review contributes an integrated conceptual framework showing that the benefits of PSAK 73 and PSAK 71 for reporting quality depend not only on the standards themselves, but also on organizational readiness and implementation capability.

Keywords

PSAK 73 PSAK 71 Financial Reporting Transparency Lease Accounting Expected Credit Loss

Article Details

How to Cite
Aruan, H. M. G. P., Maureen, D., Siagian, E. I., Silitonga, C. C., & Pandjaitan, J. (2026). The Role of PSAK 73 and PSAK 71 in Enhancing Financial Reporting Transparency, Risk Management, and Reporting Quality: An Integrative Literature Review. Golden Ratio of Data in Summary, 6(3), 883–900. https://doi.org/10.52970/grdis.v6i3.2380

References

  1. Ball, R. (2016). IFRS—10 years later. Accounting and Business Research, 46(5), 545–571. https://doi.org/10.1080/00014788.2016.1182710
  2. Barth, M. E., Landsman, W. R., & Lang, M. H. (2008). International accounting standards and accounting quality. Journal of Accounting Research, 46(3), 467–498. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1475-679X.2008.00287.x
  3. Bischof, J., Laux, C., & Leuz, C. (2021). Accounting for financial stability: Bank disclosure and loss recognition in the financial crisis. Journal of Financial Economics, 141(3), 1188–1217. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jfineco.2021.05.016
  4. Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3(2), 77–101. https://doi.org/10.1191/1478088706qp063oa
  5. Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2021). One size fits all? What counts as quality practice in reflexive thematic analysis? Qualitative Research in Psychology, 18(3), 328–352. https://doi.org/10.1080/14780887.2020.1769238
  6. De George, E. T., Li, X., & Shivakumar, L. (2016). A review of the IFRS adoption literature. Review of Accounting Studies, 21(3), 898–1004. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11142-016-9363-1
  7. Dechow, P., Ge, W., & Schrand, C. (2010). Understanding earnings quality: A review of the proxies, their determinants, and their consequences. Journal of Accounting and Economics, 50(2–3), 344–401. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jacceco.2010.09.001
  8. Dewan Standar Akuntansi Keuangan Ikatan Akuntan Indonesia. (2017a). PSAK 71: Instrumen keuangan. Ikatan Akuntan Indonesia.
  9. Dewan Standar Akuntansi Keuangan Ikatan Akuntan Indonesia. (2017b). PSAK 73: Sewa. Ikatan Akuntan Indonesia.
  10. Gebhardt, G., & Novotny-Farkas, Z. (2011). Mandatory IFRS adoption and accounting quality of European banks. Journal of Business Finance & Accounting, 38(3–4), 289–333. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-5957.2011.02242.x
  11. Giner, B., & Pardo, F. (2018). The value relevance of operating lease liabilities: Economic effects of IFRS 16. Australian Accounting Review, 28(4), 496–511. https://doi.org/10.1111/auar.12233
  12. Gomaa, M., Kanagaretnam, K., Mestelman, S., & Shehata, M. (2019). Testing the efficacy of replacing the incurred credit loss model with the expected credit loss model. European Accounting Review, 28(2), 309–334. https://doi.org/10.1080/09638180.2018.1449660
  13. Hutahaean, M. O., Manurung, A., & Saribu, A. D. (2025). Assessing the impact of accounting standards and human capital on public financial reporting quality in Indonesia. Golden Ratio of Data in Summary, 5(3), 678–690. https://doi.org/10.52970/grdis.v5i3.1590
  14. IFRS Foundation. (2014). IFRS 9 financial instruments. IFRS Foundation.
  15. IFRS Foundation. (2016). IFRS 16 leases. IFRS Foundation.
  16. Jensen, M. C., & Meckling, W. H. (1976). Theory of the firm: Managerial behavior, agency costs, and ownership structure. Journal of Financial Economics, 3(4), 305–360. https://doi.org/10.1016/0304-405X(76)90026-X
  17. Leuz, C., & Wysocki, P. D. (2016). The economics of disclosure and financial reporting regulation: Evidence and suggestions for future research. Journal of Accounting Research, 54(2), 525–622. https://doi.org/10.1111/1475-679X.12115
  18. Morales-Díaz, J., & Zamora-Ramírez, C. (2018). The impact of IFRS 16 on key financial ratios: A new methodological approach. Accounting in Europe, 15(1), 105–133. https://doi.org/10.1080/17449480.2018.1433307
  19. Nababan, J., Lumban Gaol, V. M., & Munte, M. H. M. (2025). The influence of accounting information system usage on the performance of SME in Medan Krio Village, Indonesia. Golden Ratio of Data in Summary, 5(4), 719–727. https://doi.org/10.52970/grdis.v5i4.1631
  20. Novotny-Farkas, Z. (2016). The interaction of the IFRS 9 expected loss approach with supervisory rules and implications for financial stability. Accounting in Europe, 13(2), 197–227. https://doi.org/10.1080/17449480.2016.1210180
  21. Nowell, L. S., Norris, J. M., White, D. E., & Moules, N. J. (2017). Thematic analysis: Striving to meet the trustworthiness criteria. International Journal of Qualitative Methods, 16(1), 1–13. https://doi.org/10.1177/1609406917733847
  22. Öztürk, M., & Serçemeli, M. (2016). Impact of new standard IFRS 16 leases on statement of financial position and key ratios: A case study on an airline company in Turkey. Business and Economics Research Journal, 7(4), 143–157. https://doi.org/10.20409/berj.2016422344
  23. Paul, J., & Criado, A. R. (2020). The art of writing a literature review: What do we know and what do we need to know? International Business Review, 29(4), Article 101717. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ibusrev.2020.101717
  24. Sapiri, M. (2025). Understanding financial risk dynamics: A qualitative inquiry into credit, market, and operational risks in banking, investment, and corporate sectors. Golden Ratio of Data in Summary, 5(2), 182–192. https://doi.org/10.52970/grdis.v5i2.719
  25. Snyder, H. (2019). Literature review as a research methodology: An overview and guidelines. Journal of Business Research, 104, 333–339. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2019.07.039
  26. Torraco, R. J. (2016). Writing integrative literature reviews: Using the past and present to explore the future. Human Resource Development Review, 15(4), 404–428. https://doi.org/10.1177/1534484316671606
  27. Tranfield, D., Denyer, D., & Smart, P. (2003). Towards a methodology for developing evidence-informed management knowledge by means of systematic review. British Journal of Management, 14(3), 207–222. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-8551.00375
  28. Veverková, A. (2019). IFRS 16 and its impacts on aviation industry. Acta Universitatis Agriculturae et Silviculturae Mendelianae Brunensis, 67(5), 1369–1377. https://doi.org/10.11118/actaun201967051369
  29. Whittemore, R., & Knafl, K. (2005). The integrative review: Updated methodology. Journal of Advanced Nursing, 52(5), 546–553. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2648.2005.03621.x

Similar Articles

<< < 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 > >> 

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.