A Comparative Legal Study: Euthanasia for Psychological Reasons

Main Article Content

Muhammad Ficqhi Taufik Muhlisani Ihsan
Muhammad Kamal
Aan Aswari

Abstract

This research conducts a comprehensive examination of euthanasia within the legal frameworks of Indonesia and the Netherlands, aiming to elucidate the criminal liability associated with this act. Employing a normative legal research approach, the study analyzes written legal materials, including regulations, legislation, books, journals, and related legal sources, to facilitate a cross-jurisdictional comparison. The findings reveal distinctive legal perspectives in the two countries. In the Netherlands, euthanasia was initially deemed a criminal offense under penal code sections 293 and 294. However, the landscape evolved with the enactment of the Dutch Law on Termination of Life on Request and Assisted Suicide in 2001. This legislation, effective from April 1, 2002, decriminalized euthanasia under specific conditions. Conversely, in Indonesia, euthanasia, particularly active euthanasia, lacks explicit recognition in positive law. Despite the absence of clear regulations, it is generally treated as a form of murder due to its implication in ending a person's life. Examining criminal liability in Indonesia, the study identifies article 344 of the Criminal Code as the closest provision related to euthanasia. However, detailed regulations are lacking. Additionally, the medical code of ethics plays a role in shaping responsibility. Doctors violating article 7d of the medical code of ethics, which mandates the immediate protection of human life, particularly patients, may face consequences. In conclusion, this research underscores the contrasting legal stances on euthanasia in Indonesia and the Netherlands. While the Netherlands has embraced a legalized and regulated framework, Indonesia's legal landscape remains silent on the matter. The study also highlights the need for clearer legal provisions in Indonesia and emphasizes the role of medical ethics in shaping the responsibility associated with euthanasia.

Article Details

How to Cite
Taufik Muhlisani Ihsan, M. F., Kamal, M., & Aswari, A. (2024). A Comparative Legal Study: Euthanasia for Psychological Reasons. Golden Ratio of Law and Social Policy Review, 3(2), 57-73. https://doi.org/10.52970/grlspr.v3i2.341
Section
Articles

References

Afriko, J. (2016). Hukum Kesehatan. In Media.

Ahmad, K., & Lolo, A. K. K. P. (2022). Pengantar Hukum Indonesia. PT Raja Grafindo Persada.

Alias, F., Muhammad, M., & Kassim, P. N. J. (2014). The Legality Of Euthanasia From The Malaysian And Islamic Perspectives: An Overview. In Medicine and law: Vol. 34 1 (pp. 509–532). https://api.semanticscholar.org/CorpusID:73421509

Amiruddin, M. (2017). Perbandingan Pelaksanaan Euthanasia di Negara yang Menganut. Jurisprudentie: Jurusan Ilmu Hukum Fakultas Syariah Dan Hukum, 4(1), 83–102. https://doi.org/10.24252/jurisprudentie.v4i1.3666

Arwani, M. (2020). Tinjauan Yuridis Tindak Pidana Euthanasia Berdasarkan Hukum Dari Beberapa Negara (Indonesia-Belanda- Amerika Serikat). Journal of Chemical Information and Modeling, 26(8), 940–950.

Badu, L. (2016). Euthanasia dan Hak Asasi Manusia. Jurnal Pendidikan Kewarganegaraan, 3(2), 1.

Banović, B., & Turanjanin, V. (2014). Euthanasia: Murder or Not: A Comparative Approach. Iranian Journal of Public Health, 43(10), 1316–1323.

Bocelo, I. G., & Lozano, I. M. (2022). Euthanasia in Mental Health. About a case. European Psychiatry, 65, S364–S364. https://doi.org/10.1192/j.eurpsy.2022.924

Cohen-Almagor, R. (2009). Belgian euthanasia law: a critical analysis. Journal of Medical Ethics, 35(7), 436 LP – 439. https://doi.org/10.1136/jme.2008.026799

Damar, A. A. I., Hati, P., Putu, N., Yuliartini, R., Gede, D., & Mangku, S. (2020). Tinjauan Yuridis Terkait Permohonan Suntik Mati (Euthanasia) Ditinjau Dari Kitab Undang-Undang Hukum Pidana. Jurnal Komunitas Yustisia, 2(2), 134–144.

Diwyarthi, N. D. M. S., Putra, R. S. P., Aji, S. P., Sayati, D., & Wulan, S. (2023). Ekonomi Kesehatan. PT Global Eksekutif Teknologi.

Ebrahim, A. M. (2007). Euthanasia (Qatl al-rahma). Journal of the Islamic Medical Association of North America, 39. https://doi.org/10.5915/39-4-4732

Gupta, A. K., & Bansal, D. (2023). Euthanasia – Review and Update Through the Lens of a Psychiatrist. Industrial Psychiatry Journal, 32, 15–18. https://doi.org/10.4103/ipj.ipj_259_21

Hartati, S., & Suryadin, A. (2022). Konsep Dasar Keperawatan 1. Yayasan Pendidikan Cendekia Muslim.

Hartawan, I. G. A. G. U., Dewi, A. A. S. L., & Sutama, I. N. (2020). Eutanasia dalam Perspektif Hak Asasi Manusia dan Hukum Positif di Indonesia. Jurnal Konstruksi Hukum, 1(2), 310–314. https://doi.org/10.22225/jkh.2.1.2564.310-314

Hartono, S. (1998). Kapita Selekta Perbandingan Hukum. PT Citra Aditya Bakti.

Hasanah, U., & Suatuti, E. (2019). Buku Ajar Teori Hukum. Scopindo.

Heintz, A. P. M. (1994). Euthanasia: Can be part of good terminal care. British Medical Journal, 308(6945), 1656. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.308.6945.1656

Holijah, H. (2021). Studi Pengantar Ilmu Hukum. Kencana.

Huda, H. M. (2020). Perbandingan Sistem Hukum. CV. Cendekia Press.

Irwansyah, I., & Yunus, A. (2020). Penelitian Hukum: Pilihan Metode & Praktik Penulisan Artikel. Mirra Buana Media.

Juwanda, M., & Mahfud, M. (2019). Perbandingan Hukum Euthanasia Di Indonesia Dan Belanda. Jurnal Ilmiah Mahasiswa, 3(April 2001), 20–28.

Kadek Mery Herawati, et all. (2022). Hukum Kesehatan. CV. Media Sains Indonesia.

Krisnalita, L. Y. (2022). Berkaitan Dengan Hukum Pidana Dan Ilmu Kedokteran. Binamulia Hukum, 10(2), 171–186.

Kurnia, I. dan N. (2021). Volume 4 Nomor 2, Desember 2021. 4, 3536–3559.

Manoppo, O. D. (2017). Tanggungjawab Pidana Dokter Sebagai Tenaga Medis Yang Melakukan Tindakan Euthanasia Kepada Pasien. Journal of Materials Processing Technology, 1(1), 1–8.

Muntaha, M. (2013). Surrogate Mother Dalam Perspektif Hukum Pidana Indonesia. Mimbar Hukum, 25(1). https://doi.org/10.22146/jmh.16101

Murty, H., Sari, A. G., & Rahman, I. (2020). Analisis Yuridis Terhadap Suntik Mati (Euthanasia) Ditinjau Dari Perspektif Hukum Pidana. Transparansi Hukum, 3(1), 42–65. https://doi.org/10.30737/transparansi.v3i1.667

Paulus, P. K. (2013). Kajian euthanasia menurut HAM (Studi banding hukum nasional Belanda). Jurnal Hukum UNSRAT, 21(3), 123.

Pebrianto, R. (2022). Reformulasi Sanksi Pidana bagi Pelaku Eutanasia dalam Hukum Pidana Indonesia (Reformulation of Criminal Sanction Against Eutanasia Perpetrators in Indonesian Criminal Law). Kajian Ilmiah Hukum Dan Kenegaraan (KIHAN), 1(2), 87–94.

Pramanasari, D. A. T. (2013). Analisa Pertanggungjawaban Pidana Bagi Dokter Terhadap Kasus Euthanasia Ditinjau Dari KUHP Yang Bertentangan Dengan Hak Asasi Manusia. Lex Jurnalica, 1–5.

Prihastuti, I. (2018). Euthanasia dalam Pandangan Etika secara Agama Islam, Medis dan Aspek Yuridis di Indonesia. Journal of Palliative Medicine, 24(3), 322–323. https://doi.org/10.1089/jpm.2020.0674

Raharjo, H. (2018). Sitem Hukum Indonesia. Media Pressindo.

Razy, F., & Ariani, M. (2022). Analysis of the Juridical Protection of the Most Traditional Health Laws in the Perspective of the Law of the Republic of Indonesia Number 36 of 2009 Concerning Health. International Journal of Law and Public Policy. https://doi.org/10.36079/lamintang.ijlapp-0401.276

Singh, J. A., Govender, M., & Mills, E. J. (2007). Do Human Rights Matter to Health? The Lancet, 370, 521–527. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(07)61236-7

Siregara, R. A. (2020). Euthanasia Dipandang dari Perspektif Hak Asasi Manusia dan Pasal 344 KUHPidana di Indonesia. Yure Humano, 4(1), 44–57.

Siswati, S. (2013). Etika dan Hukum Kesehatan dalam Perspektif Undang-Undang Kesehatan. Rajawali Pers.

Sjahdeini, S. R. (2020). Hukum Kesehatan Tentang “Hukum Malapraktik Tenaga Medis.” PT Penerbit IPB Press.

Sjahdeini, S. R. (2021). Sejarah Hukum Indonesia: Seri Sejarah Hukum. Prenada Media Group.

Sloan, R. (1995). Doctors may be ignorant of treatments for intractable symptoms. British Medical JournalMJ, 310, 1466. https://api.semanticscholar.org/CorpusID:37568021

Sofyan, A. (2017). Euthanasia: Concept and Rule of Law in Indonesia. Journal of Law, Policy and Globalization, 58, 27–32. http://www.iiste.org/Journals/index.php/JLPG/article/view/35570

Sofyan, A. M., & Munandar, A. M. (2021). Aspek Hukum Pelayanan Kesehatan, Euthanasia, dan Aborsi. Kencana.

Suparta, E. (2018). Jurnal Ilmiah Penegakan Hukum. 8(2), 160–173.

Syukri, M. (2008). Hukum Sakral dan Hukum Sekuler. Pustaka Alvabet.

Tack, S. (2011). Can hospitals prohibit euthanasia? An analysis from a European human rights perspective. Medicine and Law, 30 2, 295–306. https://api.semanticscholar.org/CorpusID:20262351

Takdir, T. (2018). Pengantar Hukum Kesehatan. Lembaga Penerbit Kampus IAIN Palopo.

Triwibowo, C. (2014). Etika dan Hukum Kesehatan,. Nuha Medika.

Wibowo, S. (2021). Tinjauan Yuridis Terhadap Tindakan Euthanasia dalam Perspektif Interkonektif. Jurnal Hukum Caraka Justitia, 1(2), 140. https://doi.org/10.30588/jhcj.v1i2.922

Yudhanegara, F., Arifuddin, Q., Muhtar, M. H., Yani, M. A., Amalia, M., Judijanto, L., & Adam, M. (2024). Pengantar Filsafat Hukum: Sebuah Ontologi, Epistemologi, dan Aksiologi Ilmu Hukum. PT. Sonpedia Publishing Indonesia.