Article Sidebar

Download
Download Article

Main Article Content

Abstract

This study aims to analyze the failure of state oversight of Umrah pilgrimage organizers, emphasizing the accountability of the Ministry of Religious Affairs and the need for a more effective and equitable reformulation of the regulatory oversight model. The study focuses on how the existing supervisory structure has failed to prevent violations, and how these weaknesses impact the protection of pilgrims as users of religious services. This study uses a normative legal method with a statutory and conceptual approach. The legal materials used include primary, secondary, and tertiary legal materials, analyzed descriptively and prescriptively to identify legal problems and formulate normative solutions. The results indicate that the existing supervisory system is still administrative and formalistic, thus unable to reach the substantive aspects of Umrah implementation. This failure of supervision is characterized by a weak preventive function, delays in detecting violations, and suboptimal law enforcement. Furthermore, the ministry's accountability has not been optimal, as reflected in a lack of transparency, responsiveness, and limited public participation in the supervisory process. This condition indicates an imbalance between state authority and the effectiveness of its implementation. The findings of this study emphasize the need for a reformulation of the risk- and accountability-based oversight model, which integrates transparency, public participation, and the use of technology into the oversight system. This would ensure that oversight is not merely reactive but also capable of preventive and adaptive functions. This reform is expected to create a more effective oversight system, enhance ministry accountability, and provide optimal protection for the public.

Keywords

State Oversight, Umrah Pilgrimage Ministry Accountability Regulatory Oversight Pilgrim Protection

Article Details

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

How to Cite
Hidayat, A., Zainuddin, Z., & Qahar, A. (2026). The Failure of State Oversight of Umrah Pilgrimage Organizers: An Analysis of Ministerial Accountability and Reformulation of the Regulatory Oversight Model . Golden Ratio of Law and Social Policy Review, 6(1), 97–106. https://doi.org/10.52970/grlspr.v6i1.2385
Download Citation
Endnote/Zotero/Mendeley (RIS)
BibTeX

References

  1. Arifin, Z. (2021). Pengawasan penyelenggaraan ibadah umroh di Indonesia. Jurnal Hukum dan Pembangunan, 51(2), 210–225. https://doi.org/10.21143/jhp.vol51.no2.3087
  2. Aziz, M. (2021). Kegagalan pengawasan dalam kasus penipuan umroh. Jurnal Rechtsvinding, 10(1), 45–60. https://doi.org/10.33331/rechtsvinding.v10i1.712
  3. Huda, N. (2019). Perlindungan hukum jamaah umroh dalam perspektif hukum konsumen. Jurnal IUS, 7(1), 33–47. https://doi.org/10.29303/ius.v7i1.634
  4. Kurniawan, R. (2021). Partisipasi publik dalam pengawasan kebijakan publik. Jurnal Administrasi Negara, 27(2), 145–160. https://doi.org/10.33509/jan.v27i2.812
  5. Lestari, D. (2022). Efektivitas regulasi perlindungan konsumen di sektor perbankan. Jurnal Hukum IUS QUIA IUSTUM, 29(3), 410–425. https://doi.org/10.20885/iustum.vol29.iss3.art5
  6. Prasetyo, B. (2022). Koordinasi antarinstansi dalam pengawasan umroh. Jurnal Administrasi Publik, 12(2), 150–165. https://doi.org/10.21787/jap.v12i2.981
  7. Rahman, F. (2022). Akuntabilitas pemerintah dalam penyelenggaraan layanan keagamaan. Jurnal Hukum dan Kebijakan Publik, 5(1), 77–92. https://doi.org/10.24090/jhkp.v5i1.6231
  8. Siregar, R. (2023). Risk-based supervision dalam sektor perjalanan ibadah. Jurnal Governance, 8(1), 101–118. https://doi.org/10.22219/gov.v8i1.24876
  9. Yunus, M. (2022). Transparansi dan akuntabilitas dalam pelayanan publik. Jurnal Ilmu Hukum, 18(2), 201–215. https://doi.org/10.30652/jih.v18i2.742
  10. Saragih, B. (2020). Maladministrasi dalam perspektif hukum administrasi. Jurnal Rechtsvinding, 9(1), 75–90. https://doi.org/10.33331/rechtsvinding.v9i1.397
  11. Hadjon, P. M. (2019). Pengantar hukum administrasi Indonesia. Gadjah Mada University Press.
  12. Ridwan HR. (2021). Hukum administrasi negara. Rajawali Pers.
  13. Asshiddiqie, J. (2020). Pengantar ilmu hukum tata negara. Rajawali Pers.
  14. Mahfud MD. (2020). Politik hukum di Indonesia. Rajawali Pers.
  15. Marzuki, P. M. (2022). Penelitian hukum. Kencana.
  16. Indroharto. (2020). Usaha memahami undang-undang tentang peradilan tata usaha negara. Pustaka Sinar Harapan.
  17. Sutiyoso, B. (2021). Reformasi kelembagaan dalam sistem hukum Indonesia. UII Press.
  18. Widjaja, G. (2021). Hukum administrasi negara. RajaGrafindo Persada.
  19. Prasojo, E. (2022). Reformasi birokrasi Indonesia. Kencana.
  20. Zainuddin Ali. (2022). Metode penelitian hukum. Sinar Grafika.