Article Sidebar

Download
Download Article

Main Article Content

Abstract

This research investigates the effectiveness of the Electronic Court System (E-Court) implementation at the Kotabaru District Court in Indonesia, using the End User Computing Satisfaction (EUCS) model. The study aims to assess how well the E-Court system meets its objectives of improving judicial efficiency, transparency, and accessibility, and to identify the barriers that limit its full effectiveness. The research employs a qualitative descriptive approach, utilizing primary data collected through in-depth interviews, structured observations, and document analysis. Interviews were conducted with key stakeholders, including judges, court staff, advocates, and litigants, to gather insights into their experiences with the E-Court system. The EUCS model was used to analyze user satisfaction across five dimensions: content, format, ease of use, timeliness, and support. The findings indicate that while the E-Court system has significantly improved administrative efficiency, reduced time and costs, and enhanced public access to justice, challenges persist in areas such as ease of use, timeliness, and technical support. External factors such as poor internet infrastructure, geographic constraints, and limited digital literacy also hinder the system's full potential. The study concludes that the success of the E-Court system depends on overcoming these barriers through better technical support, improved user interfaces, and broader digital literacy programs. Recommendations are made for both local and national stakeholders to address these issues and enhance the inclusivity and accessibility of the E-Court platform.

Keywords

Electronic Court System EUCS Judicial Efficiency Digital Literacy Judicial Reform

Article Details

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

How to Cite
Adithya, M., Samboteng, L., & Priyanto, A. (2026). Assessing the Effectiveness of the E-Court System Implementation Using the End-User Computing Satisfaction Model at Kotabaru District Court. Golden Ratio of Law and Social Policy Review, 5(2), 250–266. https://doi.org/10.52970/grlspr.v5i2.1881
Download Citation
Endnote/Zotero/Mendeley (RIS)
BibTeX

References

  1. Alhamdu. (2021). Analisis Statistik Dengan Program SPSS. Kotabaru: NoerFikri Offset.
  2. Dahliana, L. (2023). Kontribusi End-User Computing Satisfaction terhadap kepuasan pengguna website portal akademik pada sistem innovative campus Universitas Negeri Padang. Jurnal Vokasional Teknik Elektronika & Informatika, 2(2), 23–35.
  3. Dalimunthe, N. (2021). Pengaruh tingkat kepuasan pengguna Online Public Access Catalog (Opac) dengan metode EUCS (Studi Kasus: Perpustakaan Uin Suska Riau). Jurnal Rekayasa dan Manajemen Magister Administrasi Publik, 2(1), 89–95.
  4. Dewa, R. (2021). Analisis Kepuasan Penggunaan Terhadap Portal Program Studi Informatika Menggunakan EUCS (End User Computing Satisfaction). Proposal Thesis: Universitas Bina Dharma, Kotabaru.
  5. Dhormy, K. (2020). Implementation of Electronic Trial (E-Litigation) in Indonesian civil courts as a legal renewal of civil procedural law.
  6. Doll, W. J., & Torkzadeh, G. (2020). A confirmatory factor analysis of the End-User Computing Satisfaction Instrument. MIS Quarterly, 18(4), 453–461.
  7. Erlika, Y. (2017). Analisis kepuasan pengguna dalam penerapan Simak Online pada Universitas Terbuka Pamulang menggunakan metode EUCS. Jurnal Sistem Informasi, 3(1), 29–40.
  8. Fae, O. M., et al. (2021). Eksistensi E-Court untuk mewujudkan efisiensi dan efektivitas pada sistem peradilan Indonesia di tengah Covid-19. Journal of Syntax Transformation, 2(4), 58–69.
  9. Ghozali, I. (2013). Aplikasi Analisis Multivariate. Semarang: Badan Penerbit Universitas Diponegoro.
  10. Hamidi. (2010). Metode Penelitian dan Teori Komunikasi. Malang: UMM Press.
  11. Hidayat, A. F., et al. (2024). Efektivitas penerapan E-Court terhadap percepatan administrasi perkara perdata. Jurnal Hukum dan Sistem Peradilan (JHSP), 2(2), 144–163.
  12. Kamus Besar Bahasa Indonesia (web version). (Accessed June 20, 2024). Retrieved from http://kbbi.web.id/kuesioner
  13. Kasim, A. J., Kaimuddin, et al. (2021). Efektivitas berperkara secara elektronik (E-Court) di masa pandemi Covid-19. Jurnal Qisthosia: Jurnal Syariah dan Hukum, 2(2), 123–135.
  14. Kurniawan, R. (2015). Analisa kepuasan pengguna akhir terhadap implementasi E-Court pada Kanwil Kementerian Dalam Negeri Provinsi Kalsel menggunakan metode End User Computing Satisfaction (EUCS). Universitas Bina Dharma.
  15. Lu, M., & Zhang, W. (2022). The application and effectiveness of E-Court in enhancing judicial efficiency. International Journal of Law and Technology, 14(3), 201–215.
  16. Mohamed, A. B. (2022). The study of End-User Computing Satisfaction (EUCS) on computerized accounting system (CAS) among Peninsular Malaysia public universities: A survey in Bursar's Office. In Proceedings of IBBC Vol. 2 (pp. 594–608). Kuala Lumpur: IBBC of Malaysia.
  17. Muslihudin, M., & Oktafianto. (2021). Analisis Dan Perancangan Magister Administrasi Publik Menggunakan Model Terstruktur Dan UML. Yogyakarta: Penerbit Andi.
  18. Prabawati, T., Duadji, N., & Prihantika, I. (2021). Efektivitas penerapan aplikasi E-Court dalam upaya peningkatan kualitas pelayanan publik (Studi di Pengadilan Negeri Tanjung Karang Kelas 1A). Administrativa, 3(1), 35–46.
  19. Rachel, M. J. (2020). Development and use of information technology in international courts.
  20. Reza, I. F. (2021). Metodologi Penelitian Psikologi Kuantitatif, Kualitatif, Dan Kombinasi. Palembang: NoerFikri Offset.
  21. Reza, I. F. (2021). Penyusunan Skala Psikologi Memahami Manusia Secara Empiris. Kotabaru: NoerFikri Offset.
  22. Riadi, E. (2021). Statistika Penelitian (Analisis Manual dan IBM SPSS). Yogyakarta: Andi.
  23. Rifqah, H., & Yana, H. (2024). Peran dan urgensi E-Court dalam mewujudkan asas peradilan yang cepat, sederhana dan biaya ringan. Jurnal Al-Risalah, 20(2), 144–163.
  24. Robbins, S. P., & Coulter, M. (2018). Management. Singapore:
  25. Rogers, E. M. (2003). Diffusion of Innovations. In Achieving Cultural Change in Networked Libraries. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315263434-16
  26. Siregar, S. (2013). Metode Penelitian Kuantitatif Dilengkapi Dengan Perbandingan Perhitungan Manual & SPSS. Jakarta: Prenadamedia Group.
  27. Sugiyono. (2017). Metode Penelitian Kuantitatif Kualitatif Dan R&D. Bandung: Alfabeta.
  28. Sugiyono. (2022). Memahami Penelitian Kualitatif. Bandung: Alfabeta.
  29. Sugiyono. (2023). Metode Penelitian Pendidikan Pendekatan Kuantitatif, Kualitatif, Dan R&D. Bandung: Alfabeta.
  30. Supranto, J. (2021). Pengukuran Tingkat Kepuasan Pelanggan Untuk Menaikkan Pangsa Pasar. Jakarta: Rineka Cipta.
  31. Thoifah, I. (2021). Statistika Pendidikan dan Metode Penelitian Kuantitatif. Malang: Madani.
  32. Tjiptono, F. (2021). Service, Quality, and Satisfaction. Yogyakarta: Penerbit Andi.
  33. Triana, A. (2021). Efektivitas implementasi E-Court sebagai perwujudan peradilan cepat, sederhana, dan biaya ringan di Pengadilan Negeri Karawang. Journal Kertha Semaya, 9(7), 1120–1135.