Article Sidebar

Download
Download Article

Main Article Content

Abstract

This research is motivated by the phenomenon of misalignment between the high administrative participation of employees in innovation activities and the contraction of financial performance at PT Petrokimia Gresik. The purpose of this study is to analyze the role of Ambidextrous Leadership in improving employee Innovation Work Behavior, specifically examining the mediating effect of Work Engagement and the moderating effect of Climate for Innovation. Methodology: This study uses a causal explanatory quantitative approach. A total of 464 organic employees were involved as respondents, selected through purposive sampling to ensure participants had relevant innovation experience. Data analysis was conducted using Structural Equation Modeling (SEM) with AMOS software and Bootstrapping estimation. Findings: The results show that Ambidextrous Leadership and Work Engagement have a positive and significant effect on Innovation Work Behavior. Work Engagement significantly mediates the influence of Ambidextrous Leadership on Innovation Work Behavior. Additionally, Climate for Innovation negatively moderates the relationship between Ambidextrous Leadership and Innovation Work Behavior, indicating a redundancy effect due to the organization's well-established innovation system. Theoretically, this study expands the understanding of innovative behavior antecedents through Dynamic Capabilities Theory. Practically, the results provide strategic input for management to formulate dual-focus leadership training and improve psychological well-being to accelerate impactful innovation.

Keywords

Ambidextrous Leadership Innovation Work Behavior Work Engagement Climate for Innovation PT Petrokimia Gresik

Article Details

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

How to Cite
Dzaudanilislam, A. A., Choirunnisa, Z. N., & Harjono, A. C. (2026). The Influence of Ambidextrous Leadership on Innovation Work Behavior at PT Petrokimia Gresik: The Mediating Role of Work Engagement and Moderating Role of Climate for Innovation. Golden Ratio of Human Resource Management, 6(2), 413–426. https://doi.org/10.52970/grhrm.v6i2.2172
Download Citation
Endnote/Zotero/Mendeley (RIS)
BibTeX

References

  1. Agarwal, U. A. (2014). Linking justice, trust and innovative work behaviour to work engagement. Personnel Review, 43(1), 41–73. https://doi.org/10.1108/PR-02-2012-0019
  2. Akıncı, Ç., Aksoy, M., & Atılgan, N. (2022). The moderating role of climate for innovation in the effect of leaders' closing behaviors on individual innovation. Anatolia: An International Journal of Tourism and Hospitality Research, 33(1), 103–115. https://doi.org/10.1080/13032917.2021.1914561
  3. Almeda, J., Capistrano, T., & Sarte, G. (2010). On the misuse of Slovin's formula. The Philippine Statistician, 61(1), 129–136.
  4. Baron, R. M., & Kenny, D. A. (1986). The moderator-mediator variable distinction in social psychological research: Conceptual, strategic, and statistical considerations. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 51(6), 1173–1182. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.51.6.1173
  5. Bryman, A., & Bell, E. (2015). Business research methods (4 ed.). Oxford University Press.
  6. Byrne, B. M. (2016). Structural equation modeling with AMOS: Basic concepts, applications, and programming (3 ed.). Routledge.
  7. Carvalho, A. C., Sant'Anna, A. S., & Lima, F. P. A. (2023). Innovation in the public sector: The role of organizational climate and leadership. Innovation & Management Review, 20(2), 150–168. https://doi.org/10.1108/INMR-06-2021-0108
  8. Christensen, C. M. (2016). The innovator's dilemma: When new technologies cause great firms to fail. Harvard Business Review Press.
  9. Cooper, D. R., & Schindler, P. S. (2014). Business research methods (12 ed.). McGraw-Hill Education.
  10. Dahiya, R., & Raghuvanshi, J. (2021). Validation of the innovative work behavior scale: A study of Indian service sector organizations. International Journal of Innovation Science, 13(4), 437–456. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJIS-10-2020-0186
  11. Ferdinand, A. (2014). Management research methods: Research guidelines for writing thesis, thesis, and dissertation in management science. BP Diponegoro University.
  12. Gerlach, F., Hundeling, M., & Rosing, K. (2020). Ambidextrous leadership and innovation performance: A meta-analysis. Journal of Business and Psychology, 35, 81–102. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10869-018-9567-1
  13. Hair, J. F., Hult, G. T. M., Ringle, C. M., & Sarstedt, M. (2017). A primer on partial least squares structural equation modeling (PLS-SEM) (2 ed.). SAGE Publications.
  14. Hidayat, A., et al. (2023). Strategic Leadership in Agro-Industrial Solutions: Navigating Organizational Change and Employee Performance. Golden Ratio of Human Resource Management, 3(2), 145–158. https://doi.org/10.52970/grhrm.v3i2.
  15. Hsu, M. L. A., & Chen, F. H. (2017). The cross-level mediating effect of psychological capital on the organizational innovation climate–employee innovative behavior relationship. International Journal of Contemporary Hospitality Management, 29(9), 2316–2335. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJCHM-04-2016-0193
  16. Isaksen, S. G., & Ekvall, G. (2010). Managing for innovation: The two faces of tension in creative climates. Creativity and Innovation Management, 19(2), 73–88. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8691.2010.00558.x
  17. Janssen, O. (2000). Job demands, perceptions of effort–reward fairness and innovative work behaviour. Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology, 73(3), 287–302. https://doi.org/10.1348/096317900167038
  18. Kline, R. B. (2015). Principles and practice of structural equation modeling (4 ed.). Guilford Press.
  19. Kartikasari, D., et al. (2025). Empowering Human Capital in High-Pressure Environments: The Role of Adaptive Leadership. Golden Ratio of Human Resource Management, 5(1), 12–28. https://doi.org/10.52970/grhrm.v5i1.
  20. March, J. G. (1991). Exploration and exploitation in organizational learning. Organizational Science, 2(1), 71–87. https://doi.org/10.1287/orsc.2.1.71
  21. Putra, A. H. P. K., & Santoso, B. (2024). Psychological Empowerment and Innovative Work Behavior: A Mapping of Strategic Human Resources. Golden Ratio of Mapping and Business Management, 4(1), 88–104. https://doi.org/10.52970/grmbm.v4i1.
  22. PT Petrokimia Gresik. (2023). Annual Report 2023: Petrokimia Gresik on the Move: Towards a More Innovative & Sustainable Industry. PT Petrokimia Gresik.
  23. Ren, F., & Zhang, J. (2015). Job stressors, organizational innovation climate, and employees' innovative behavior. Creativity Research Journal, 27(1), 16–23. https://doi.org/10.1080/10400419.2015.992659
  24. Rosing, K., Frese, M., & Bausch, A. (2011). Explaining the heterogeneity of the leadership–innovation relationship: Ambidextrous leadership. The Leadership Quarterly, 22(5), 956–974. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.leaqua.2011.07.014
  25. Saks, A. M. (2006). Antecedents and consequences of employee engagement. Journal of Managerial Psychology, 21(7), 600–619. https://doi.org/10.1108/02683940610690169
  26. Schaufeli, W. B., Bakker, A. B., & Salanova, M. (2006). The measurement of work engagement with a short questionnaire: A cross-national study. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 66(4), 701–716. https://doi.org/10.1177/0013164405282471
  27. Schaufeli, W. B., Salanova, M., González-Roma, V., & Bakker, A. B. (2002). The measurement of engagement and burnout: A two-sample confirmatory factor analytic approach. Journal of Happiness Studies, 3(1), 71–92. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1015630930326
  28. Schwab, K. (2016). The fourth industrial revolution. World Economic Forum.
  29. Scott, S. G., & Bruce, R. A. (1994). Determinants of innovative behavior: A path model of individual innovation in the workplace. Academy of Management Journal, 37(3), 580–607. https://doi.org/10.2307/256701
  30. Sekaran, U., & Bougie, R. (2016). Research Methods for Business: A Skill-Building Approach (7th ed.). Wiley.
  31. Slåtten, T., & Mehmetoglu, M. (2011). Antecedents and effects of employee engagement on innovative work behavior. Managing Service Quality: An International Journal, 21(1), 88–107. https://doi.org/10.1108/09604521111100261
  32. Teece, D. J. (2007). Explicating dynamic capabilities: The nature and microfoundations of sustainable enterprise performance. Strategic Management Journal, 28(13), 1319–1350. https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.640
  33. Teece, D. J., Pisano, G., & Shuen, A. (1997). Dynamic capabilities and strategic management. Strategic Management Journal, 18(7), 509–533. https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1097-0266(199708)18:7
  34. Tidd, J., & Bessant, J. (2020). Managing innovation: Integrating technological, market and organizational change (7 ed.). John Wiley & Sons.
  35. Usman, M., Gul, H., & Rana, M. H. (2021). Ambidextrous leadership and employee creative process engagement: The role of psychological safety and learning orientation. Leadership & Organization Development Journal, 42(5), 675–690. https://doi.org/10.1108/LODJ-04-2020-0158
  36. Waheed, A., Abbas, Z., & Arshad, M. A. (2017). How empowering leadership leads to innovative work behavior: The mediating role of work engagement. Pakistan Journal of Commerce and Social Sciences, 11(2), 525–542.
  37. Zikmund, W. G., Babin, B. J., Carr, J. C., & Griffin, M. (2013). Business research methods (9 ed.). Cengage Learning.