Article Sidebar

Download
Download Article

Main Article Content

Abstract

This study aims to determine and analyze the effects of capital structure, firm growth, and profitability on the firm value on the IDX. The population in this study were all manufacturing companies in the consumer goods industry sector, as many as 42 firms, and the number of samples was as many as 12 firms using the purposive sampling method. This study uses secondary data derived from the annual financial statements of manufacturing companies listed on the IDX. The data were analyzed using SPSS program. The results of this study indicate that capital structure and profitability have a negative and insignificant effect on the firm value on the IDX. The firm's growth has a positive and negligible impact on the firm value on the IDX. Trade Off Theory explains that if the position of the capital structure is below the optimal point, any additional debt will increase the firm's value. On the other hand, if the position of the capital structure is above the optimal threshold, any additional debt will reduce the firm's value. Statistically, the capital structure has a negative and insignificant effect on the firm value in the consumer goods industry sector listed on the IDX.

Keywords

Firm Value Capital Structure Firm Growth Profitability

Article Details

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

How to Cite
Amin, M. (2021). The Regression Effect of Capital Structure and Firm Growth on the Firm value. Golden Ratio of Finance Management, 1(1), 33–50. https://doi.org/10.52970/grfm.v1i1.202
Download Citation
Endnote/Zotero/Mendeley (RIS)
BibTeX

References

  1. Al-Mulla, M., & Bradbury, M. E. (2020). The demand and supply timely financial reports. Pacific Accounting Review, 32(3), 335–353. https://doi.org/10.1108/PAR-10-2018-0076
  2. Amirya, M., & Atmini, S. (2014). Determinan Tingkat Hutang Serta Hubungan Tingkat Hutang Terhadap Nilai Perusahaan: Perspektif Pecking Order Theory. Jurnal Akuntansi Dan Keuangan Indonesia, 5(2), 227–234.
  3. Annarelli, A., Battistella, C., & Nonino, F. (2020). Competitive advantage implication of different Product Service System business models: Consequences of ‘not-replicable’ capabilities. Journal of Cleaner Production, 247, 119121. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.119121
  4. Baker, H. K., Veit, E. T., & Powell, G. E. (2001). Factors influencing dividend policy decisions of Nasdaq firms. Financial Review, 36(3), 19–38. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-6288.2001.tb00018.x
  5. Brad, L., Munteanu, A., & Brasoveanu, I. V. (2015). Measuring the Performance of Romanian Listed Companies Considering their Individual Characteristics. Procedia Economics and Finance, 32, 1225–1235. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/S2212-5671(15)01500-2
  6. Brigham, E. F., & Houston, J. F. (2021). Fundamentals of financial management. Cengage Learning.
  7. Edeling, A., Srinivasan, S., & Hanssens, D. M. (2020). The marketing–finance interface: A new integrative review of metrics, methods, and findings and an agenda for future research. International Journal of Research in Marketing. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijresmar.2020.09.005
  8. Flammer, C. (2021). Corporate green bonds. Journal of Financial Economics, 142(2), 499–516. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jfineco.2021.01.010
  9. Frank, M. Z., & Goyal, V. K. (2009). Capital structure decisions: which factors are reliably important? Financial Management, 38(1), 1–37. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1755-053X.2009.01026.x
  10. Ghozali, I. (2005). Aplikasi Analisis Multivariate dengan SPSS. Badan Penerbit UNDIP.
  11. Irimia-Diéguez, A. I., González-Villegas, J. B., & Oliver-Alfonso, M. D. (2014). The Financial Performance of an Innovative Megaproject. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 119, 417–426. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2014.03.047
  12. Kurnia, D. (2019). Profitabilitas, kebijakan dividen dan harga saham terhadap nilai perusahaan. Jurnal Akuntansi: Kajian Ilmiah Akuntansi, 6(2), 182–186. https://doi.org/10.30656/jak.v6i2.1433
  13. Le, H. P. (2020). The energy-growth nexus revisited: the role of financial development, institutions, government expenditure and trade openness. Heliyon, 6(7), e04369. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2020.e04369
  14. Liu, T., Wang, J., Zhu, Y., & Qu, Z. (2021). Linking economic performance and sustainable operations of China’s manufacturing firms: What role does the government involvement play? Sustainable Cities and Society, 67, 102717. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scs.2021.102717
  15. Lou, X., Qian, A., & Zhang, C. (2021). Do CEO’s political promotion incentives influence the value of cash holdings: Evidence from state-owned enterprises in China. Pacific-Basin Finance Journal, 68, 101617. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pacfin.2021.101617
  16. Lu, Y., & Chen, Y. (2021). Is China’s agricultural enterprise growing steadily? Evidence from listed agricultural companies. Chinese Journal of Population, Resources and Environment, 19(2), 203–212. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cjpre.2021.12.022
  17. Maryanti, E., & Meiliza, D. R. (2019). Profitability Determinant and the Effect of Capital Structure. Journal of Economics, Business, and Government Challenges, 2(2), 169–175. https://doi.org/10.33005/ebgc.v2i2.99
  18. Modigliani, F., & Miller, M. H. (1958). The cost of capital, corporation finance and the theory of investment. The American Economic Review, 48(3), 261–297. https://www.jstor.org/stable/1809766
  19. Norvaišienė, R., & Stankevičienė, J. (2012). The relationship of corporate governance decision on capital structure and company’s performance: evidence from Lithuanian food and beverages industry companies. Ekonomika Ir Vadyba, 17, 480–486. https://www.lituanistika.lt/content/41828
  20. Odit, M. P., & Gobardhun, Y. D. (2011). The determinants of financial leverage of SMEs in Mauritius. International Business & Economics Research Journal (IBER), 10(3), 113–126. https://doi.org/10.19030/iber.v10i3.4107
  21. Raharjo, S., & Wahyuni, S. (2019). Analisis pengaruh pembiayaan murabahah dan mudharabah terhadap nilai perusahaan dengan profitabilitas sebagai variabel intervening. Jurnal Bisnis Dan Manajemen (Journal of Business and Management), 19(1), 39–50. https://doi.org/10.20961/jbm.v19i1
  22. Rajapathirana, R. P. J., & Hui, Y. (2018). Relationship between innovation capability, innovation type, and firm performance. Journal of Innovation and Knowledge, 3(1), 44–55. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jik.2017.06.002
  23. Safrida, E. (2008). Pengaruh struktur modal dan pertumbuhan perusahaan terhadap nilai perusahaan pada perusahaan manufaktur di Bursa Efek Jakarta.
  24. Syahraini Syaiful. 2015. Pengaruh Struktur Modal Dan Pertumbuhan Perusahaan Terhadap Nilai Perusahaan Manufaktur Yang Tercatat Di Bursa Efek Indonesia. Tesis.
  25. Ullah, A., Pinglu, C., Ullah, S., Zaman, M., & Hashmi, S. H. (2020). The nexus between capital structure, firm-specific factors, macroeconomic factors and financial performance in the textile sector of Pakistan. Heliyon, 6(8), e04741. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2020.e04741
  26. Yuliana, I. (2019). Profitability, capital structure and allocation of corporate social responsibility (CSR) funds to corporate values in basic industrial and chemical industry companies in Indonesia. El Muhasaba Jurnal Akuntansi, 10(2), 159–178. http://dx.doi.org/10.18860/em.v10i2.6750