Article Sidebar

Download
Download Article

Main Article Content

Abstract

This study analyzes liquidity, solvency, and profitability of stock prices in construction and building companies listed on the Indonesia Stock Exchange (IDX) for the period 2016-2021. The sample in this study is construction and building companies listed on the Indonesia Stock Exchange (IDX), which is selected based on specific criteria using the Purpose Sampling Method. The analysis used in this study is the Regression Analysis. The results of this study show that liquidity variables have a positive and significant effect on stock prices, and solvency variables have a positive and significant impact on stock prices. In contrast, profitability variables have a positive but insignificant effect on stock prices. The current ratio can be a useful measure of a company’s short-term solvency when it is placed in the context of what has been historically normal for the company and its peer group. It also offers more insight when calculated repeatedly over several periods. What makes the current ratio good or bad often depends on how it is changing. A company that seems to have an acceptable current ratio could be trending toward a situation in which it will struggle to pay its bills. Conversely, a company that may appear to be struggling now could be making good progress toward a healthier current ratio.

Keywords

Liquidity Ratio Solvency Ratio Profitability Ratio Stock Price

Article Details

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

How to Cite
Afifuddin, A. (2022). The Regression Model Effect of Financial Ratio on Construction and Building Stock Price. Golden Ratio of Finance Management, 2(1), 43–60. https://doi.org/10.52970/grfm.v2i1.194
Download Citation
Endnote/Zotero/Mendeley (RIS)
BibTeX

References

  1. Al-Kassar, T. A., & Soileau, J. S. (2014). Financial performance evaluation and bankruptcy prediction (failure)1. Arab Economic and Business Journal, 9(2), 147–155. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aebj.2014.05.010
  2. Boisjoly, R. P., Conine, T. E., & McDonald, M. B. (2020). Working capital management: Financial and valuation impacts. Journal of Business Research, 108, 1–8. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2019.09.025
  3. Brad, L., Munteanu, A., & Brasoveanu, I. V. (2015). Measuring the Performance of Romanian Listed Companies Considering their Individual Characteristics. Procedia Economics and Finance, 32, 1225–1235. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/S2212-5671(15)01500-2
  4. Caporale, G. M., Lodh, S., & Nandy, M. (2017). The performance of banks in the MENA region during the global financial crisis. Research in International Business and Finance, 42, 583–590. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ribaf.2017.07.003
  5. D’Inverno, G., Carosi, L., & Romano, G. (2021). Environmental sustainability and service quality beyond economic and financial indicators: A performance evaluation of Italian water utilities. Socio-Economic Planning Sciences, 75, 100852. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.seps.2020.100852
  6. D’Mello, R., & Miranda, M. (2014). Introduction of Equity-Based Compensation and Impact on Firm Policies. In Corporate Governance in the US and Global Settings (Vol. 17, pp. 153–192). Emerald Group Publishing Limited. https://doi.org/10.1108/S1569-373220140000017005
  7. Ekinci, R., & Poyraz, G. (2019). The Effect of Credit Risk on Financial Performance of Deposit Banks In Turkey. Procedia Computer Science, 158, 979–987. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procs.2019.09.139
  8. Ferramosca, S. (2019). A worldwide empirical analysis of the accounting behaviour in the waste management sector. Waste Management, 88, 211–225. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wasman.2019.03.041
  9. Ghozali, I. (2013). Aplikasi Analisis Multivariate Dengan Program IBM dan SPSS. In aplikasi analisis multivariate dengan program ibm spss 19 (p. 113). https://doi.org/10.2307/1579941
  10. Hanaysha, J. (2016). Testing the Effects of Employee Engagement, Work Environment, and Organizational Learning on Organizational Commitment. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 229, 289–297. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2016.07.139
  11. Hazudin, S. F., Mohamad, S. A., Azer, I., Daud, R., & Paino, H. (2015). ISO 14001 and Financial Performance: Is the Accreditation Financially Worth It for Malaysian Firms. Procedia Economics and Finance, 31, 56–61. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/S2212-5671(15)01131-4
  12. Holm, M., & Ax, C. (2020). The interactive effect of competition intensity and customer service competition on customer accounting sophistication—Evidence of positive and negative associations. Management Accounting Research, 46, 100644. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mar.2019.07.001
  13. Ismal, R. (2010). Assessment of liquidity management in Islamic banking industry. International Journal of Islamic and Middle Eastern Finance and Management, 3(2), 147–167. https://doi.org/10.1108/17538391011054381
  14. Khomsatun, S., Rossieta, H., Fitriany, F., & Nasution, M. E. (2021). Sharia Disclosure, Sharia Supervisory Board and the Moderating Effect of Regulatory Framework: The Impact on Soundness of Islamic Banking. In W. A. Barnett & B. S. Sergi (Eds.), Recent Developments in Asian Economics International Symposia in Economic Theory and Econometrics (Vol. 28, pp. 291–321). Emerald Publishing Limited. https://doi.org/10.1108/S1571-038620210000028017
  15. Ozcelik, H. (2020). An Analysis of Fraudulent Financial Reporting Using the Fraud Diamond Theory Perspective: An Empirical Study on the Manufacturing Sector Companies Listed on the Borsa Istanbul. In S. Grima, E. Boztepe, & P. J. Baldacchino (Eds.), Contemporary Issues in Audit Management and Forensic Accounting (Vol. 102, pp. 131–153). Emerald Publishing Limited. https://doi.org/10.1108/S1569-375920200000102012
  16. Ozlanski, M. E. (2019). Bright lines vs. blurred lines: When do critical audit matters influence investors’ perceptions of management’s reporting credibility? Advances in Accounting, 45, 100416. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.adiac.2019.04.001
  17. Ramsbottom, G., Horan, B., Berry, D. P., & Roche, J. R. (2015). Factors associated with the financial performance of spring-calving, pasture-based dairy farms. Journal of Dairy Science, 98(5), 3526–3540. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.3168/jds.2014-8516
  18. Sarstedt, M., Ringle, C. M., Henseler, J., & Hair, J. F. (2014). On the emancipation of PLS-SEM: A commentary on Rigdon (2012). Long Range Planning, 47(3), 154–160.
  19. Saygili, E., Arslan, S., & Birkan, A. O. (2021). ESG practices and corporate financial performance: Evidence from Borsa Istanbul. Borsa Istanbul Review. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bir.2021.07.001
  20. Semaw Henock, M. (2019). Financial sustainability and outreach performance of saving and credit cooperatives: The case of Eastern Ethiopia. Asia Pacific Management Review, 24(1), 1–9. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apmrv.2018.08.001
  21. Shaverdi, M., Heshmati, M. R., & Ramezani, I. (2014). Application of Fuzzy AHP Approach for Financial Performance Evaluation of Iranian Petrochemical Sector. Procedia Computer Science, 31, 995–1004. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procs.2014.05.352
  22. Taghipour, A., & Dejban, R. (2013). Job Performance: Mediate Mechanism of Work Motivation. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 84, 1601–1605. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2013.06.796
  23. Teker, S., Teker, D., & Güner, A. (2016). Financial Performance of Top 20 Airlines. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 235, 603–610. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2016.11.035
  24. Ullah, A., Pinglu, C., Ullah, S., Zaman, M., & Hashmi, S. H. (2020). The nexus between capital structure, firm-specific factors, macroeconomic factors and financial performance in the textile sector of Pakistan. Heliyon, 6(8), e04741. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2020.e04741
  25. Vătavu, S. (2015). The Impact of Capital Structure on Financial Performance in Romanian Listed Companies. Procedia Economics and Finance, 32, 1314–1322. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/S2212-5671(15)01508-7
  26. Yagi, M., & Kokubu, K. (2018). Corporate material flow management in Thailand: The way to material flow cost accounting. Journal of Cleaner Production, 198, 763–775. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.07.007