Article Sidebar

Download
Download Article

Main Article Content

Abstract

This study explores the relationship between firm risk-taking and financial performance, with a particular focus on the moderating role of Environmental, Social, and Governance (ESG) practices. Using panel data from 86 firms listed on the Indonesia Stock Exchange over the 2018–2023 period, Ordinary Least Squares (OLS) regression with year fixed effects was employed. The results show that risk-taking has a positive and significant effect on firm performance, supporting the risk–return trade-off perspective. However, the interaction term reveals a negative moderation, meaning that ESG weakens the relationship between risk-taking and firm performance. This suggests that firms with stronger ESG commitments adopt more cautious strategies, which may reduce short-term financial gains but reinforce long-term stability and stakeholder trust. The findings contribute to the literature by clarifying the dual role of ESG as both a performance enhancer and a risk-control mechanism in emerging markets. Managers should integrate ESG principles into their strategic risk management frameworks to ensure that risk-taking decisions are aligned with sustainability objectives. Future studies should adopt broader risk-taking measures (R&D investment or leverage), extend the scope to cross-country settings, and integrate qualitative approaches for deeper insights.

Keywords

ESG Firm Risk-Taking Firm Performance ROA

Article Details

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

How to Cite
Hesniati, Stefani, C., & Budiman, J. (2025). When Risk-Taking Meets ESG: Implications for Firm Performance in Indonesia. Golden Ratio of Finance Management, 5(2), 600–610. https://doi.org/10.52970/grfm.v5i2.1670
Download Citation
Endnote/Zotero/Mendeley (RIS)
BibTeX

References

  1. Ademi, B., & Klungseth, N. J. (2022). Does it pay to deliver superior ESG performance? Evidence from US S&P 500 companies. Journal of Global Responsibility, 13(4), 421–449. https://doi.org/10.1108/JGR-01-2022-0006
  2. Alrobai, F., & Albaz, M. M. (2025). The impact of CEO attributes on sustainability performance: evidence from an emerging economy. Journal of Risk and Financial Management, 18(5), 268–287. https://doi.org/https:// doi.org/10.3390/jrfm18050268
  3. Chang, S. F., Chen, B. S., Chen, H. Y., & Chen, H. Y. (2025). The impact of ESG ratings on firm risks in Taiwan’s market. Pacific Basin Finance Journal, 92(May), 102819. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pacfin.2025.102819
  4. Dakhli, A. (2021). Does financial performance moderate the relationship between board attributes and corporate social responsibility in French firms? Journal of Global Responsibility, 12(4), 373–399. https://doi.org/10.1108/JGR-02-2021-0016
  5. Dang, C., (Frank) Li, Z., & Yang, C. (2018). Measuring firm size in empirical corporate finance. Journal of Banking and Finance, 86, 159–176. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbankfin.2017.09.006
  6. Dissanayake, S., Weerasinghe, A., & Dissanayake, D. (2025). Engineer CEOs and corporate risk-taking. Journal of Accounting Literature, 47(5), 249–269. https://doi.org/10.1108/JAL-06-2024-0132
  7. Du, L., & Azman, N. H. N. (2024). The impact of ESG performance on corporate risk-taking: empirical evidence from China. Journal of Sustainable Finance & Investment, 14(4), 745–765. https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/20430795.2024.2366179?scroll=top&needAccess=true
  8. Du, Q., Sun, Z., Goodell, J. W., Du, A. M., & Yang, T. (2024). Ecological risk and corporate sustainability: Examining ESG performance, risk management, and productivity. International Review of Financial Analysis, 96(April). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.irfa.2024.103551
  9. Erisa, A. D. P., & Sundari, S. (2025). Influence of Operational Costs, Company Size, and Operational Leverage on Property & Real Estate Sector Profitability Listed on the Indonesia Stock Exchange. Golden Ratio of Finance Management, 5(2), 445–459. https://doi.org/10.52970/grfm.v5i2.1008
  10. Febriyanti, & Mon, M. D. (2025). The Effect of Work Environment, Reward System, and Management Support through Work Satisfaction on Achievement Motivation in Batam Manufacturing Industry. Jurnal Manajemen (Edisi Elektronik), 16(1), 28–44. https://doi.org/10.32832/jm-uika.v16i1.17931
  11. He, F., Ding, C., Yue, W., & Liu, G. (2023). ESG performance and corporate risk-taking: Evidence from China. International Review of Financial Analysis, 87(August 2022), 102550. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.irfa.2023.102550
  12. Hesniati, H., Margaretha, F., & Kristaung, R. (2019). Intellectual Capital, Knowledge Management, and Firm Performance in Indonesia. European Journal of Business and Management Research, 4(6), 4–7. https://doi.org/10.24018/ejbmr.2019.4.6.133
  13. Hesniati, H., Vernando, L., Haryanto, H., & Arviano, H. (2024). Board Gender Diversity and Its Impact on Firm Risk-Taking. Jurnal Dinamika Manajemen, 15(1), 1–9. https://doi.org/10.15294/jdm.v15i1.47872
  14. Ho, L., Nguyen, V. H., & Dang, T. L. (2024). ESG and firm performance: do stakeholder engagement, financial constraints, and religiosity matter? Journal of Asian Business and Economic Studies, 31(4), 263–276. https://doi.org/10.1108/JABES-08-2023-0306
  15. Hsiao, P. C. K., & Kelly, M. (2018). Investment considerations and impressions of integrated reporting: Evidence from Taiwan. Sustainability Accounting, Management and Policy Journal, 9(1), 2–28. https://doi.org/10.1108/SAMPJ-10-2016-0072
  16. Itan, I., Ahmad, Z., Setiana, J., & Karjantoro, H. (2024). Corporate governance, tax avoidance, and earnings management: family CEO vs non-family CEO managed companies in Indonesia. Cogent Business and Management, 11(1). https://doi.org/10.1080/23311975.2024.2312972
  17. Jensen, M. C., & Meckling, W. H. (1976). Theory of The Firm: Managerial Behavior, Agency Cost, and Ownership Structure. Journal of Financial Economics, 3(4), 305–360.
  18. López, M. (2023). The effect of sampling mode on response rate and bias in elite surveys. Quality and Quantity, 57(2), 1303–1319. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11135-022-01406-9
  19. Mallinguh, E., Wasike, C., & Zoltan, Z. (2020). The business sector, firm age, and performance: the mediating role of foreign ownership and financial leverage. International Journal of Financial Studies, 8(4), 1–16. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijfs8040079
  20. Markowitz, H. (1952). Portfolio Selection. The Journal of Finance, 7(1), 77–91. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-6261.1952.tb01525.x
  21. Mirza, S. S., Safdar, R., Yu, Y., & Gulzar, M. A. (2019). Managerial Empowerment and Firm Risk-Taking. SAGE Open, 9(2). https://doi.org/10.1177/2158244019856963
  22. Nguyen, N. B. (2024). Impacts of ESG Performance on the Profitability of ASEAN-6 Commercial Banks in the Context of Digital Transformation. Global Business and Finance Review, 29(5), 60–71. https://doi.org/10.17549/gbfr.2024.29.5.60
  23. Nurachman, I. A., & Soeratin, H. Z. (2025). Analisis penerapan ESG terhadap nilai perusahaan. Integrative Perspectives of Social and Science Journal (IPSSJ), 2(1), 703–713.
  24. Popa, D. N., Bogdan, V., Sabau Popa, C. D., Belenesi, M., & Badulescu, A. (2021). Performance mapping in two-step cluster analysis through ESEG disclosures and EPS. Kybernetes, 51(13), 98–118. https://doi.org/10.1108/K-08-2021-0672
  25. Prihandono, I., & Yuniarti, D. S. (2023). Indonesia’s Sustainability Reporting Standard: What Needs to be Improved? Padjadjaran Journal of International Law, 7(1), 1–23.
  26. Pulino, S. C., Ciaburri, M., Magnanelli, B. S., & Nasta, L. (2022). Does ESG Disclosure Influence Firm Performance? Sustainability (Switzerland), 14(13), 1–18. https://doi.org/10.3390/su14137595
  27. Rahi, A. F., Akter, R., & Johansson, J. (2022). Do sustainability practices influence financial performance? Evidence from the Nordic financial industry. Accounting Research Journal, 35(2), 292–314. https://doi.org/10.1108/ARJ-12-2020-0373
  28. Simamora, A. J. (2023). Firms' performance, risk, and managerial ability. International Journal of Productivity and Performance Management, 72(3), 789–808. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1108/IJPPM-03-2021-0172
  29. Siwi, P. R., Natasia, B., Salsabilla, N., Putri, R. K., & Hanifah, U. (2024). Optimization of Financial Risk Management as an Effort For Economic Stability. Ekonomi Dan Bisnis, 06(1), 25–34. https://doi.org/10.35590/jeb.v10i1.
  30. Tarmuji, I., Maelah, R., & Tarmuji, N. H. (2016). The Impact of Environmental, Social, and Governance Practices (ESG) on Economic Performance: Evidence from ESG Score. International Journal of Trade, Economics and Finance, 7(3), 67–74. https://doi.org/10.18178/ijtef.2016.7.3.501
  31. Teng, X., Wu, K. S., Kuo, L., & Chang, B. G. (2023). Investigating the double-edged sword effect of environmental, social, and governance practices on corporate risk-taking in the high-tech industry. In Oeconomia Copernicana (Vol. 14, Issue 2). https://doi.org/10.24136/oc.2023.014
  32. Utami, R., Zuyyina, Z., Firmansyah, A., & Muhtadin, Y. (2025). Valuing Companies Through Environment, Social, Governance : The Role of Company Reputation and Financial Performance as Mediating Variables in Companies Listed on the IDX. Golden Ratio of Finance Management, 5(59), 486–502.
  33. Velte, P. (2020). Does CEO power moderate the link between ESG performance and financial performance?: A focus on the German two-tier system. Management Research Review, 43(5), 497–520. https://doi.org/10.1108/MRR-04-2019-0182
  34. Windi Ar, B. M. S., Handajani, L., & Nurabiah, N. (2025). Analysis of The Influence of Green Accounting, Company Size, and Dividend Payout Ratio on Profitability. Golden Ratio of Finance Management, 5(2), 345–357. https://doi.org/10.52970/grfm.v5i2.1152
  35. Wooldridge, J. M. (2013). Introductory Econometrics: A Modern Approach (Fifth Edition). Cengage Learning.
  36. Yung, K., & Chen, C. (2018). Managerial ability and firm risk-taking behavior. Review of Quantitative Finance and Accounting, 51(4), 1005–1032. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11156-017-0695-0
  37. Yustin, M., & Suhendah, R. (2023). The Effect of Profitability, Risk, and Company Age on ESG Disclosure. International Journal of Application on Economics and Business, 1(1), 151–161. https://doi.org/10.24912/ijaeb.v1i1.151-161