Article Sidebar

Download
Download Article

Main Article Content

Abstract

In this study, we aim to investigate the effects of ownership structure on profitability, corporate social responsibility on profitability, ownership structure on firm value, corporate social responsibility on firm value, and profitability on the value of manufacturing companies listed on the stock exchange. We used a structural equation model (SEM) to analyze the data with the help of the AMOS program version 18. We found that (1) ownership structure has a positive and significant effect on company profitability (2) corporate social responsibility has a positive and significant effect on company profitability (4) Corporate social responsibility is positively and significantly correlated with firm value; and profitability is positively and significantly correlated with the value of manufacturing companies listed on the Indonesia Stock Exchange. The findings of this study back up the Legitimacy Theory and Stakeholders Theory that the legitimacy gap may be closed by legitimizing techniques such expanding social responsibility, in this instance a set of expenditures. Profitability is influenced by the ownership structure. This research demonstrates that the growing share ownership structure, including institutional, management, and public share ownership, indicates that the company's capital is becoming more powerful, and that if the capital is managed correctly, profitability will increase.

Keywords

Share Ownership Structure Corporate Social Responsibility Profitability Company Value

Article Details

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

How to Cite
Hasanuddin, R. (2022). Analysis of the effects of ownership-structure and social responsibility on profitability and company value. Golden Ratio of Finance Management, 2(1), 15–28. https://doi.org/10.52970/grfm.v2i1.161
Download Citation
Endnote/Zotero/Mendeley (RIS)
BibTeX

References

  1. Adelina, D. – P., & Roxana, S. (Misa) M. (2016). Financial-Economic Indicators – Vectors of Budgetary Performance. Case Study Romania. Procedia Economics and Finance, 39, 833–839. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/S2212-5671(16)30262-3
  2. Albanesi, S., Olivetti, C., & Prados, M. J. (2015). Gender and Dynamic Agency: Theory and Evidence on the Compensation of Top Executives . In Gender in the Labor Market (Vol. 42, pp. 1–59). Emerald Group Publishing Limited. https://doi.org/10.1108/S0147-912120150000042001
  3. Angelia, D., & Suryaningsih, R. (2015). The Effect of Environmental Performance And Corporate Social Responsibility Disclosure Towards Financial Performance (Case Study to Manufacture, Infrastructure, And Service Companies That Listed At Indonesia Stock Exchange). Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 211, 348–355. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2015.11.045
  4. Auamnoy, T., & Areepium, N. (2011). PRM8 Could Corporate Social Responsibility Predict Pharmaceutical Corporate Financial performance? Value in Health, 14(7), A422. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jval.2011.08.1039
  5. Biondi, Y. (2016). Public debt accounting and management in UK: Refunding or refinancing? Or, the strange case of Doctor Jekyll and Mr Hyde in the aftermath of the Global Financial Crisis. Accounting Forum, 40(2), 89–105. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.accfor.2016.02.003
  6. Bressan, S., & Weissensteiner, A. (2021). The financial conglomerate discount: Insights from stock return skewness. International Review of Financial Analysis, 74, 101662. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.irfa.2021.101662
  7. Charbel, S., Elie, B., & Georges, S. (2013). Impact of family involvement in ownership management and direction on financial performance of the Lebanese firms. International Strategic Management Review, 1(1), 30–41. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ism.2013.08.003
  8. Chen, Y. (2018). The effect of mandatory CSR disclosure on firm profitability and social externalities: Evidence from China. Journal of Accounting and Economics, 65(1), 169–190. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jacceco.2017.11.009
  9. de Leijster, V., Verburg, R. W., Santos, M. J., Wassen, M. J., Martínez-Mena, M., de Vente, J., & Verweij, P. A. (2020). Almond farm profitability under agroecological management in south-eastern Spain: Accounting for externalities and opportunity costs. Agricultural Systems, 183, 102878. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agsy.2020.102878
  10. Ezzi, F., & Jarboui, A. (2016). Does innovation strategy affect financial, social and environmental performance? Journal of Economics, Finance and Administrative Science, 21(40), 14–24. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jefas.2016.03.001
  11. Gao, L., Sheikh, S., & Zhou, H. (2022). Executive compensation linked to corporate social responsibility and firm risk. International Journal of Managerial Finance, ahead-of-p(ahead-of-print). https://doi.org/10.1108/IJMF-10-2021-0511
  12. Jo, H. (2011). Corporate Governance and Firm Value: The Impact of Corporate Social Responsibility. Journal of Business Ethics, 103(3), 351–383. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-011-0869-y
  13. Lin, L., Hung, P.-H., Chou, D.-W., & Lai, C. W. (2019). Financial performance and corporate social responsibility: Empirical evidence from Taiwan. Asia Pacific Management Review, 24(1), 61–71. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apmrv.2018.07.001
  14. Lins, K. v. (2017). Social Capital, Trust, and Firm Performance: The Value of Corporate Social Responsibility during the Financial Crisis. Journal of Finance, 72(4), 1785–1824. https://doi.org/10.1111/jofi.12505
  15. Mahoney, L. S., Thorne, L., Cecil, L., & LaGore, W. (2013). A research note on standalone corporate social responsibility reports: Signaling or greenwashing? Critical Perspectives on Accounting, 24(4–5), 350–359. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.CPA.2012.09.008
  16. Murdifin, I., Pelu, M. F. A. R., Putra, A. A. H. P. K., Arumbarkah, A. M., Muslim, M., & Rahmah, A. (2018). Environmental Disclosure as Corporate Social Responsibility: Evidence from the Biggest Nickel Mining in Indonesia. International Journal of Energy Economics and Policy, 9(1), 115–122.
  17. Nguyen, N. T. T., Nguyen, N. P., & Thanh Hoai, T. (2021). Ethical leadership, corporate social responsibility, firm reputation, and firm performance: A serial mediation model. Heliyon, 7(4), e06809. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2021.e06809
  18. Oyewumi, O. R., Ogunmeru, O. A., & Oboh, C. S. (2018). Investment in corporate social responsibility, disclosure practices, and financial performance of banks in Nigeria. Future Business Journal, 4(2), 195–205. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fbj.2018.06.004
  19. Ozlanski, M. E. (2019). Bright lines vs. blurred lines: When do critical audit matters influence investors’ perceptions of management’s reporting credibility? Advances in Accounting, 45, 100416. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.adiac.2019.04.001
  20. Palade, D., & Tanasă, F.-E. (2015). A Perspective on the Performance of the Entity. Financial-accounting Approach. Procedia Economics and Finance, 32, 1740–1768. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/S2212-5671(15)01480-X
  21. Wahba, H., & Elsayed, K. (2015). The mediating effect of financial performance on the relationship between social responsibility and ownership structure. Future Business Journal, 1(1), 1–12. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fbj.2015.02.001
  22. Zioło, M., Bąk, I., Cheba, K., Spoz, A., & Niedzielski, P. (2021). Sustainable financial systems toward sustainability in finance. Institutional and managerial approach. Procedia Computer Science, 192, 4237–4248. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procs.2021.09.200