Article Sidebar
Main Article Content
Abstract
This research aimed to know and analyzed the influence of positive motivation, discipline, and job environment variables on performance by an employee on the Secretariat of General Election Commission East Luwu Regency and to know and analyzed the dominant variable toward performance by an employee on Secretariat of General Election Commission East Luwu Regency. This research used descriptive and quantitative approaches. Total respondents of research namely all employees of the Secretariat of General Election Commission East Luwu Regency amount to 35 respondents. The method of gathering data which used namely observation, interview, questionnaire, and documentation. The result analyzed from the F-test obtained count> F-table, so from the result it can to conclusion that simultaneously the motivation, discipline, and job environment variables influenced the performance of an employee on Secretariat of General Election Commission East Luwu Regency. From the result of the F-test and coefficient, the correlation can know also that the motivation, discipline, and job environment toward performance amount to 65,6% which means 34,4% influenced by another variable which not observed in this research. The result of research from t-test obtained of t-count from each independent variable> t-table, with this can to conclusion that all of the independent variables partially influenced toward performance by the employee on Secretariat of General Election Commission East Luwu Regency. Through the result of the coefficient, a regression can know that the dominant variable which influenced performance namely discipline.
Keywords
Article Details
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
References
- Chen, L. L., Mirpuri, S., Rao, N., & Law, N. (2021). Conceptualization and measurement of digital citizenship across disciplines. Educational Research Review, 33, 100379. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.edurev.2021.100379
- Clayback, K. A., & Hemmeter, M. L. (2021). Exclusionary discipline practices in early childhood settings: A survey of child care directors. Early Childhood Research Quarterly, 55, 129–136. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecresq.2020.11.002
- Donbesuur, F., Ampong, G. O. A., Owusu-Yirenkyi, D., & Chu, I. (2020). Technological innovation, organizational innovation and international performance of SMEs: The moderating role of domestic institutional environment. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 161, 120252. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2020.120252
- Donley, J. (2021). The Impact of Work Environment on Job Satisfaction: Pre-COVID Research to Inform the Future. Nurse Leader, 19(6), 585–589. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mnl.2021.08.009
- Dyer, L., Power, J., Steen, A., Wallis, L., & Davison, A. (2021). Uncertainty and disciplinary difference: Mapping attitudes towards uncertainty across discipline boundaries. Design Studies, 77, 101055. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.destud.2021.101055
- Nirino, N., Santoro, G., Miglietta, N., & Quaglia, R. (2021). Corporate controversies and company’s financial performance: Exploring the moderating role of ESG practices. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 162, 120341. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2020.120341
- Spivack, A. J., & Woodside, A. G. (2019). Applying complexity theory for modeling human resource outcomes: Antecedent configurations indicating perceived location autonomy and work environment choice. Journal of Business Research, 102, 109–119. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2019.05.006
- Tang, J. (2021). CEO self-discipline in power use: A key moderator for the effect of CEO power. European Management Journal, 39(5), 633–644. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.emj.2021.01.007
References
Chen, L. L., Mirpuri, S., Rao, N., & Law, N. (2021). Conceptualization and measurement of digital citizenship across disciplines. Educational Research Review, 33, 100379. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.edurev.2021.100379
Clayback, K. A., & Hemmeter, M. L. (2021). Exclusionary discipline practices in early childhood settings: A survey of child care directors. Early Childhood Research Quarterly, 55, 129–136. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecresq.2020.11.002
Donbesuur, F., Ampong, G. O. A., Owusu-Yirenkyi, D., & Chu, I. (2020). Technological innovation, organizational innovation and international performance of SMEs: The moderating role of domestic institutional environment. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 161, 120252. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2020.120252
Donley, J. (2021). The Impact of Work Environment on Job Satisfaction: Pre-COVID Research to Inform the Future. Nurse Leader, 19(6), 585–589. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mnl.2021.08.009
Dyer, L., Power, J., Steen, A., Wallis, L., & Davison, A. (2021). Uncertainty and disciplinary difference: Mapping attitudes towards uncertainty across discipline boundaries. Design Studies, 77, 101055. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.destud.2021.101055
Nirino, N., Santoro, G., Miglietta, N., & Quaglia, R. (2021). Corporate controversies and company’s financial performance: Exploring the moderating role of ESG practices. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 162, 120341. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2020.120341
Spivack, A. J., & Woodside, A. G. (2019). Applying complexity theory for modeling human resource outcomes: Antecedent configurations indicating perceived location autonomy and work environment choice. Journal of Business Research, 102, 109–119. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2019.05.006
Tang, J. (2021). CEO self-discipline in power use: A key moderator for the effect of CEO power. European Management Journal, 39(5), 633–644. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.emj.2021.01.007