The Role of PSAK 73 and PSAK 71 in Enhancing Financial Reporting Transparency, Risk Management, and Reporting Quality An Integrative Literature Review

Main Article Content

Hicca Maria Gandi Putri Aruan
Debora Maureen
Engle Imelia Siagian
Cindi Clawidia Silitonga
Jonathan Pandjaitan

Abstract

This study examines how the implementation of PSAK 73 on leases and PSAK 71 on financial instruments affects financial reporting transparency, risk management, and reporting quality. The study applies a descriptive qualitative design through an integrative literature review of accounting standards, peer-reviewed journal articles, and relevant academic literature. The findings show that PSAK 73 improves reporting transparency by requiring the recognition of right-of-use assets and lease liabilities, thereby reducing the potential for off-balance-sheet financing and providing a more complete representation of lease obligations. PSAK 71 improves the relevance and timeliness of credit risk information through the expected credit loss model, which requires entities to incorporate historical data, current conditions, and forward-looking economic information. However, both standards create substantial reporting complexity. PSAK 73 requires entities to determine lease terms, discount rates, contract modifications, and the present value of lease payments. PSAK 71 requires the estimation of probability of default, loss given default, exposure at default, and macroeconomic scenarios. Effective implementation therefore depends on reliable accounting information systems, high-quality data, strong internal controls, cross-functional coordination, and sound professional judgment. Practically, companies need to strengthen contract databases, credit risk models, employee competence, and governance procedures. This review contributes an integrated conceptual framework showing that the benefits of PSAK 73 and PSAK 71 for reporting quality depend not only on the standards themselves, but also on organizational readiness and implementation capability.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Article Details

How to Cite
Aruan, H. M. G. P., Maureen, D., Siagian, E. I., Silitonga, C. C., & Pandjaitan, J. (2026). The Role of PSAK 73 and PSAK 71 in Enhancing Financial Reporting Transparency, Risk Management, and Reporting Quality: An Integrative Literature Review. Golden Ratio of Data in Summary, 6(3), 883–900. https://doi.org/10.52970/grdis.v6i3.2380
Section
Accounting, Management, Business, Economic

References

Ball, R. (2016). IFRS—10 years later. Accounting and Business Research, 46(5), 545–571. https://doi.org/10.1080/00014788.2016.1182710

Barth, M. E., Landsman, W. R., & Lang, M. H. (2008). International accounting standards and accounting quality. Journal of Accounting Research, 46(3), 467–498. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1475-679X.2008.00287.x

Bischof, J., Laux, C., & Leuz, C. (2021). Accounting for financial stability: Bank disclosure and loss recognition in the financial crisis. Journal of Financial Economics, 141(3), 1188–1217. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jfineco.2021.05.016

Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3(2), 77–101. https://doi.org/10.1191/1478088706qp063oa

Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2021). One size fits all? What counts as quality practice in reflexive thematic analysis? Qualitative Research in Psychology, 18(3), 328–352. https://doi.org/10.1080/14780887.2020.1769238

De George, E. T., Li, X., & Shivakumar, L. (2016). A review of the IFRS adoption literature. Review of Accounting Studies, 21(3), 898–1004. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11142-016-9363-1

Dechow, P., Ge, W., & Schrand, C. (2010). Understanding earnings quality: A review of the proxies, their determinants, and their consequences. Journal of Accounting and Economics, 50(2–3), 344–401. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jacceco.2010.09.001

Dewan Standar Akuntansi Keuangan Ikatan Akuntan Indonesia. (2017a). PSAK 71: Instrumen keuangan. Ikatan Akuntan Indonesia.

Dewan Standar Akuntansi Keuangan Ikatan Akuntan Indonesia. (2017b). PSAK 73: Sewa. Ikatan Akuntan Indonesia.

Gebhardt, G., & Novotny-Farkas, Z. (2011). Mandatory IFRS adoption and accounting quality of European banks. Journal of Business Finance & Accounting, 38(3–4), 289–333. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-5957.2011.02242.x

Giner, B., & Pardo, F. (2018). The value relevance of operating lease liabilities: Economic effects of IFRS 16. Australian Accounting Review, 28(4), 496–511. https://doi.org/10.1111/auar.12233

Gomaa, M., Kanagaretnam, K., Mestelman, S., & Shehata, M. (2019). Testing the efficacy of replacing the incurred credit loss model with the expected credit loss model. European Accounting Review, 28(2), 309–334. https://doi.org/10.1080/09638180.2018.1449660

Hutahaean, M. O., Manurung, A., & Saribu, A. D. (2025). Assessing the impact of accounting standards and human capital on public financial reporting quality in Indonesia. Golden Ratio of Data in Summary, 5(3), 678–690. https://doi.org/10.52970/grdis.v5i3.1590

IFRS Foundation. (2014). IFRS 9 financial instruments. IFRS Foundation.

IFRS Foundation. (2016). IFRS 16 leases. IFRS Foundation.

Jensen, M. C., & Meckling, W. H. (1976). Theory of the firm: Managerial behavior, agency costs, and ownership structure. Journal of Financial Economics, 3(4), 305–360. https://doi.org/10.1016/0304-405X(76)90026-X

Leuz, C., & Wysocki, P. D. (2016). The economics of disclosure and financial reporting regulation: Evidence and suggestions for future research. Journal of Accounting Research, 54(2), 525–622. https://doi.org/10.1111/1475-679X.12115

Morales-Díaz, J., & Zamora-Ramírez, C. (2018). The impact of IFRS 16 on key financial ratios: A new methodological approach. Accounting in Europe, 15(1), 105–133. https://doi.org/10.1080/17449480.2018.1433307

Nababan, J., Lumban Gaol, V. M., & Munte, M. H. M. (2025). The influence of accounting information system usage on the performance of SME in Medan Krio Village, Indonesia. Golden Ratio of Data in Summary, 5(4), 719–727. https://doi.org/10.52970/grdis.v5i4.1631

Novotny-Farkas, Z. (2016). The interaction of the IFRS 9 expected loss approach with supervisory rules and implications for financial stability. Accounting in Europe, 13(2), 197–227. https://doi.org/10.1080/17449480.2016.1210180

Nowell, L. S., Norris, J. M., White, D. E., & Moules, N. J. (2017). Thematic analysis: Striving to meet the trustworthiness criteria. International Journal of Qualitative Methods, 16(1), 1–13. https://doi.org/10.1177/1609406917733847

Öztürk, M., & Serçemeli, M. (2016). Impact of new standard IFRS 16 leases on statement of financial position and key ratios: A case study on an airline company in Turkey. Business and Economics Research Journal, 7(4), 143–157. https://doi.org/10.20409/berj.2016422344

Paul, J., & Criado, A. R. (2020). The art of writing a literature review: What do we know and what do we need to know? International Business Review, 29(4), Article 101717. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ibusrev.2020.101717

Sapiri, M. (2025). Understanding financial risk dynamics: A qualitative inquiry into credit, market, and operational risks in banking, investment, and corporate sectors. Golden Ratio of Data in Summary, 5(2), 182–192. https://doi.org/10.52970/grdis.v5i2.719

Snyder, H. (2019). Literature review as a research methodology: An overview and guidelines. Journal of Business Research, 104, 333–339. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2019.07.039

Torraco, R. J. (2016). Writing integrative literature reviews: Using the past and present to explore the future. Human Resource Development Review, 15(4), 404–428. https://doi.org/10.1177/1534484316671606

Tranfield, D., Denyer, D., & Smart, P. (2003). Towards a methodology for developing evidence-informed management knowledge by means of systematic review. British Journal of Management, 14(3), 207–222. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-8551.00375

Veverková, A. (2019). IFRS 16 and its impacts on aviation industry. Acta Universitatis Agriculturae et Silviculturae Mendelianae Brunensis, 67(5), 1369–1377. https://doi.org/10.11118/actaun201967051369

Whittemore, R., & Knafl, K. (2005). The integrative review: Updated methodology. Journal of Advanced Nursing, 52(5), 546–553. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2648.2005.03621.x

Similar Articles

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 > >> 

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.