Influence of Digital Leadership, Environmental Awareness, and Organizational Learning on Sustainable Supply Chain Performance through Green Supply Chain Innovation
Article Sidebar
Main Article Content
Abstract
awareness, and organizational learning on sustainable supply chain performance through green supply chain innovation. This research was conducted in the cosmetics manufacturing industry in Ciledug, South Jakarta, Indonesia. A quantitative approach was used, with data collected from 240 employees involved in supply chain activities using purposive sampling. Data were analyzed using Partial Least Squares–Structural Equation Modeling (PLS-SEM) with SmartPLS 4. The results show that digital leadership, environmental awareness, and organizational learning have a positive and significant effect on green supply chain innovation. Green supply chain innovation also has a significant positive effect on sustainable supply chain performance and mediates the relationship between the independent variables and sustainable supply chain performance. These findings highlight the importance of digital leadership, environmental awareness, and organizational learning in improving sustainable supply chain performance through green innovation. This study provides practical insights for managers to strengthen digital capabilities and sustainability practices and contributes to the sustainable supply chain management literature.
Downloads
Article Details
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
References
Atieh, A. A., & Abushaega, M. M. (2025). Achieving Supply Chain Sustainability Through Green Innovation: A Dynamic Capabilities-Based Approach in the Logistics Sector. Sustainability (Switzerland), 17(13). https://doi.org/10.3390/su17135716
Cheng, W., Li, Q., Wu, Q., Ye, F., & Jiang, Y. (2024). Digital capability and green innovation: The perspective of green supply chain collaboration and top management’s environmental awareness. Heliyon, 10(11). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e32290
Deng, Q., Huang, X., Zou, J., & He, Y. (2024). Screening of sustainable supply chain performance evaluation indicators based on the ill-conditioned index cycle method. PLoS ONE, 19(3 March). https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0293038
Elbawab, R. (2024). Linking organisational learning, performance, and sustainable performance in universities: an empirical study in Europe. Humanities and Social Sciences Communications, 11(1). https://doi.org/10.1057/s41599-024-03114-1
Evenseth, L. L., Sydnes, M., & Gausdal, A. H. (2022). Building Organizational Resilience Through Organizational Learning: A Systematic Review. In Frontiers in Communication (Vol. 7). Frontiers Media S.A. https://doi.org/10.3389/fcomm.2022.837386
Gao, P., & Gao, Y. (2024). How Does Digital Leadership Foster Employee Innovative Behavior: A Cognitive–Affective Processing System Perspective. Behavioral Sciences, 14(5). https://doi.org/10.3390/bs14050362
Hair, J. F., Black, W. C., Babin, B. J., & Anderson, R. E. (2019). MULTIVARIATE DATA ANALYSIS EIGHTH EDITION. www.cengage.com/highered
Hussein, H., Albadry, O. M., Mathew, V., Al-Romeedy, B. S., Alsetoohy, O., Abou Kamar, M., & Khairy, H. A. (2024). Digital Leadership and Sustainable Competitive Advantage: Leveraging Green Absorptive Capability and Eco-Innovation in Tourism and Hospitality Businesses. Sustainability (Switzerland), 16(13). https://doi.org/10.3390/su16135371
Kumar, A., Shrivastav, S. K., Shrivastava, A. K., Panigrahi, R. R., Mardani, A., & Cavallaro, F. (2023). Sustainable Supply Chain Management, Performance Measurement, and Management: A Review. In Sustainability (Switzerland) (Vol. 15, Number 6). MDPI. https://doi.org/10.3390/su15065290
Li, H., Li, F., Ma, J., & Liu, B. (2024). How digital leadership adds affective commitment of new generation employees: an affective events perspective. Frontiers in Psychology, 15. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2024.1476047
Li, W., Xiao, X., Yang, X., & Li, L. (2023). How Does Digital Transformation Impact Green Supply Chain Development? An Empirical Analysis Based on the TOE Theoretical Framework. Systems, 11(8). https://doi.org/10.3390/systems11080416
Li, X., Li, Y., Li, G., & Xu, J. (2025). Sustainable supply chain management practices and performance: The moderating effect of stakeholder pressure. Humanities and Social Sciences Communications, 12(1). https://doi.org/10.1057/s41599-025-04676-4
Miranti, S., & Lunarindiah, G. (2025). Digital Transformation has a positive effect on Company Performance. Smart Supply Chain Technology, 4(4).
Olaleye, B. R., & Mosleh, S. F. (2025). Greening Sustainable Supply Chain Performance: The Moderating and Mediating Influence of Green Value Co-Creation and Green Innovation. Administrative Sciences, 15(5). https://doi.org/10.3390/admsci15050183
Pedraja-Rejas, L., Rodríguez-Ponce, E., & Rojas-Miranda, P. (2025). The Impact of Organisational Learning on Innovation and Institutional Performance in Universities: A Narrative Review. In Systems (Vol. 13, Number 9). Multidisciplinary Digital Publishing Institute (MDPI). https://doi.org/10.3390/systems13090743
Qiao, J., Li, S., Xiong, S., & Li, N. (n.d.). Green Supply Chain Innovation | Encyclopedia Green Supply Chain Innovation Subjects: Business.
Rad, D., & Bocoș, M. (2024). Advancements in Learning Organizations: A Comprehensive Narrative Review. Revista Romaneasca Pentru Educatie Multidimensionala, 16(2), 418–446. https://doi.org/10.18662/rrem/16.2/865
Rusli, U., & Usman, A. (2025). A Systematic Literature Review: The Role Of Supply Chain Management In Enhancing Corporate Operational Performance. Indonesian Interdisciplinary Journal of Sharia Economics (IIJSE), 8(1).
Saeed, M. A., & Kersten, W. (n.d.). Supply chain sustainability performance indicators-A systematic literature review. Retrieved www.bvl.de/lore
Steg, L. (2025). Annual Review of Psychology Downloaded from www.annualreviews.org. Guest (guest) IP: 182.6.2.85 On: Sun. 48, 2. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-psych-032720
Tigre, F. B., Henriques, P. L., & Curado, C. (2025). The digital leadership emerging construct: a multi-method approach. Management Review Quarterly, 75(1), 789–836. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11301-023-00395-9
Wang, M., & Zhang, G. (2023). What motivates firms to adopt a green supply chain and how much does it matter? Frontiers in Environmental Science, 11. https://doi.org/10.3389/fenvs.2023.1227008
Wijayanti, A. R. Y., Kaimuddin, K., Abdullah, M. A., Nurlaela, N., Astina, A., Arafat, A., Jabbar, F. B. A., & Nurfaizi, N. (2024). Pendampingan dan Penguatan Kapasitas Masyarakat dalam Pemulihan Kerusakan Lingkungan di Provinsi Sulawesi Barat. Warta LPM, 291–302. https://doi.org/10.23917/warta.v27i2.4636
Wu, Q., Xie, S., Wang, S., Zhou, A., Abruquah, L. A., & Chen, Z. (2024). Effects of environmental awareness training and environmental commitment on firm’s green innovation performance: Empirical insights from medical equipment suppliers. PLoS ONE, 19(3 March). https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0297960
Zhang, B., Zhao, S., Fan, X., Wang, S., & Shao, D. (2022). Green supply chain integration, supply chain agility and green innovation performance: Evidence from Chinese manufacturing enterprises. Frontiers in Environmental Science, 10. https://doi.org/10.3389/fenvs.2022.1045414
Zhaolei, L., Nazir, S., Hussain, I., Mehmood, S., & Nazir, Z. (2023). Exploration of the impact of green supply chain management practices on manufacturing firms’ performance through a mediated-moderated model. Frontiers in Environmental Science, 11. https://doi.org/10.3389/fenvs.2023.1291688