Main Article Content

Abstract

This study examines the implementation of the Neighborhood Association (RT) fund policy in supporting community empowerment programs in RT 11, Belimbing Sub-district, BTN PKT Bontang Housing Complex. The government allocates Rp 50 million to each RT for empowerment activities; however, community participation in programs such as MSME training, urban farming, and supplementary feeding for toddlers remains relatively low. Participation typically ranges from 12–15 residents (60–75%) out of the 20-person quota, despite adequate funding. The objective of this study is to analyze factors influencing the implementation of the RT fund policy using George C. Edward III's policy implementation framework, which includes four variables: communication, resources, implementer disposition, and bureaucratic structure. This research employs a qualitative descriptive approach using purposive sampling. Twelve informants participated, including the Head of Belimbing Sub-district, the Head of RT 11, and eight community residents. Data were collected through in-depth interviews, participatory observation, and documentation. The findings show that communication functions effectively through formal meetings and WhatsApp groups. Resources are considered adequate, including financial support, facilities, and technical assistance, with funds distributed in the form of goods rather than cash. The disposition of implementers reflects a strong commitment, though some residents face limitations due to work schedules. The bureaucratic structure also operates regularly through community deliberation mechanisms. Overall, the implementation of the RT fund policy runs relatively well, supported by the four variables proposed by Edward III. Nevertheless, increasing community participation remains a challenge due to socioeconomic factors, particularly work commitments and time constraints. These findings suggest the importance of flexible program scheduling to accommodate working residents better and enhance participation in government-funded empowerment programs.

Keywords

Policy Implementation Community Empowerment Community Participation Local Governance

Article Details

How to Cite
Manggaramitha, A. A., Amalia, D. R., Pratama, M. A. A. P., & Mulka, S. R. (2026). Implementation of Neighborhood Fund Policy in Community Empowerment Programs: A Case Study from Belimbing Village, Bontang City, Indonesia. Golden Ratio of Community Services and Dedication, 6(1), 101–116. https://doi.org/10.52970/grcsd.v6i1.1984

References

  1. Afriansyah. (2023). Pengertian dan Konsep Pemberdayaan Masyarakat. In Pemberdayaan Masyarakat.
  2. Amanta, R. W. (2020). Implementasi Program Kegiatan Peningkatan Sarana Kecamatan Sampang, Kabupaten Sampang (Studi pada RT 02 RW 04 dan RT 02 RW 02 Kelurahan Dalpenang). Publika-Jurnal Unesa, 8(5), 1–11.
  3. Arisman, P., Studi, P., Negara, A., Ekonomi, F., Ilmu, D. A. N., Islam, U., Sultan, N., & Kasim, S. (2025). Implementasi Program Forum Komunikasi Rt/Rw.
  4. Beno, J., Silen, A., & Yanti, M. (2022). Peraturan Wali Kota Bontang Nomor 5 Tahun 2022 Tentang Pedoman Pelaksanaan Program Fasilitasi Partisipasi Masyarakat Dalam Pembangunan Di Kelurahan. In Braz Dent J. (Vol. 33, Issue 1, pp. 1–12).
  5. Cadman, T., Maraseni, T., Koju, U. A., Shrestha, A., & Karki, S. (2023). Forest Governance in Nepal concerning Sustainable Community Forest Management and Red Panda Conservation. Land, 12(2), 1–23. https://doi.org/10.3390/land12020493
  6. Christens, B. D., & Speer, P. W. (2015). Community organizing: Practice, research, and policy implications. Social Issues and Policy Review, 9(1), 193–222. https://doi.org/10.1111/sipr.12014
  7. Creswell, W. (2024). 4.2. Karakteristik Penelitian Kualitatif. Metode Penelitian Kualitatif, 45.
  8. Debora Eva Entaren, F. A. (2025). Pembangunan berkelanjutan di Desa Musi, Kecamatan Lirung. 11(9).
  9. Desmond, M., & Kimbro, R. T. (2015). Eviction's fallout: Housing, hardship, and health. Social Forces, 94(1), 295–324. https://doi.org/10.1093/sf/sov044
  10. Fathan Qorib. (2016). Ini Dasar Hukum Iuran Rukun Tetangga. Sumber pendanaan lembaga kemasyarakatan terbagi dua jenis: ada yang desa dan kelurahan. https://www.hukumonline.com/berita/a/ini-dasar-hukum-iuran-rukun-tetangga-lt57f8d1d643e0d/
  11. Fernandes, G., Aguirre-Jaimes, A., Contreras-Varela, X., Cocoletzi, E., de Sousa, W. O., Araujo, L., Nunes, B., Angeles, G., Quesada, M., Briones, O., Ceccantini, G., Ornelas, J. F., Stokes, A., Angeles, G., Anthelme, F., Aranda-Delgado, E., Barois, I., Bounous, M., Cruz-Maldonado, N., … Dipholis, I. (2022). Implementasi Kebijakan Keamanan Dan Ketertiban Di Desa Baru Kecamatan Ibu Selatan Kabupaten Halmahera Barat. New Phytologist, 51(1), 2022. https://doi.org/10.20935/AL189%0Ahttps://www.researchgate.net/publication/269107473_What_is_governance/link/548173090cf22525dcb61443/download%0Ahttp://www.econ.upf.edu/~reynal/Civil wars_12December2010.pdf%0Ahttps://think-asia.org/handle/11540/8282%0Ahttp
  12. Han, H. (2016). The Organizational Roots of Political Activism : Field Experiments on. May 1–12. https://doi.org/10.1017/S000305541600006X
  13. junadi. (2018). Implementasi program dana stimulan rt (rukun Tetangga) terhadap peningkatan kesejahteraan masyarakat tahun 2017 (Suatu studi di Kelurahan Babat, Kecamatan Babat, Kabupaten Lamongan). 3(2), 1–6.
  14. Kabeer, N. (2016). Gender equality, economic growth, and women's agency: The "endless variety" and "monotonous similarity" of patriarchal constraints. Feminist Economics, 22(1), 295–321.
  15. Koentari, Y. (2025). Penguatan Model Pengawasan Partisipatif Kewargaan dalam Tata Kelola Dana Desa. Journal of the Research Center for Digital Democracy, 1(1), 48–58.
  16. Ledwith, M. (2020). Community development: A critical and radical approach. Policy Press.
  17. Mansuri, G., & Rao, V. (2012). Localizing development: Does participation work? World Bank Publications.
  18. Marpaung Lintje Anna. (2020). Politik Pemerintahan Daerah. 1, 1–223.
  19. McConnell, C., Muia, D. M., & Clarke, A. (2022). International community development practice. Routledge, Taylor & Francis Group.
  20. Mubarok, S., Zauhar, S., & Setyowati, E. (2020). Journal of Public Administration Studies Policy Implementation Analysis : Exploration of George Edward III, Marilee S Grindle, and Mazmanian and Sabatier Theories in the Policy Analysis Triangle. 5(1), 33–38.
  21. Muliani S. (2019). Analisis Jaringan Dalam Implementasi Kebijakan Teori dan Praktik. 157.
  22. Muminah, S., & Suprajogo, T. (2025). Implementasi Kebijakan Pembangunan Daerah melalui Pendekatan Bottom-Up. Scientific Journal Of Reflection : Economic, Accounting, Management and Business, 8(4), 1485–1495. https://doi.org/10.37481/sjr.v8i4.1253
  23. Perkins, D. D., Hughey, J., & Speer, P. W. (2002). Community Psychology Perspectives on Social Capital Theory and Community Development Practice. Journal of the Community Development Society, 33(1), 33–52. https://doi.org/10.1080/15575330209490141
  24. Poerwanto, W. (2025). Reorientasi Kebijakan Pemberdayaan Masyarakat dalam Pembangunan Kelautan dan Perikanan Berkelanjutan. Jurnal Kebijakan Sosial Ekonomi Kelautan Dan Perikanan, 15(2), 167–186.
  25. Pujasetiandi, L. Bagus P. (2020). Implementasi Kebijakan Pemerintah Kabupaten Lombok Barat Dalam Penggunaan Produk Lokal Unggulan Daerah. Jurnal Lentera, 19, 44.
  26. Putri, B. T. (2016). Perbandingan Pelaksanaan Program Lima Puluh Juta Per Rt (Prolita) Di Kota Bontang. 4(2), 714–726.
  27. Rahayu, T. (2022). Fenomena spill the tea kekerasan seksual di media sosial pada Generasi Z Kota Bandung Universitas Pendidikan Indonesia | repository.upi.edu | perpustakaan.upi.edu. 2019, 34–46.
  28. Rahmawati, A. S., Haryati, E., & Mustofa, A. (2025). Analisis Pemberdayaan Masyarakat Pada Bidang Perekonomian Melalui Kegiatan Home Industry Di Kampung Songkok (Studi Kasus Di Desa Pengangsalan, Kecamatan Kalitengah, Kabupaten Lamongan). Majalah Ilmiah "DIAN ILMU", 24(2), 131–150.
  29. Rande, S., & Asmarani, M. (2025). Breaking the Chain of Violence: A Study of Policy Implementation on Child Protection in Samarinda City, Indonesia. Golden Ratio of Law and Social Policy Review, 4(2), 48–54. https://doi.org/10.52970/grlspr.v4i2.1228
  30. Ridhawati, R. (2025). Akuntabilitas dalam Desentralisasi Fiskal: Tantangan dan Strategi untuk Tata Kelola Pemerintah Daerah. Journal of Scientific Mandalika (JSM), 6, 80–87.
  31. Rosnalahasan. (2015). Implementasi Kebijakan Sistem Informasi Administrasi Kependudukan Di Dinas Kependudukan Dan Pencatatan Sipil Kabupaten Bolaang Mongondow Utara. E-Jurnal Katalogis, 3(7), 135–145.
  32. Sampson, R. J. (2019). Neighbourhood effects and beyond: Explaining the paradoxes of inequality in the changing American metropolis. Urban Studies, 56(1), 3–32. https://doi.org/10.1177/0042098018795363
  33. Sayid Athfal Alauddin. (2025). Komunikasi, sumber daya manusia, sikap dan struktur birokrasi (Edward III) dalam pelayanan haji di Halmahera Timur. 11(November), 157–172.
  34. Simanjuntak, K. M. (2015). Implementasi Kebijakan Desentralisasi Pemerintahan Di Indonesia. 23, 111–130.
  35. Sormin, R. D. (2021). The Effect of Communication, Resources, Disposition, and Structure of Bureaucracy on Medical Participation of Men's Operations in City of Bandar Lampung ( Study of George Edward III Policy Implementation Model). 7, 323–338.
  36. Wahyudi, A., Supriyadi, R. P., Defano, M. N., & Haliza, E. P. (2025). Community Empowerment and Strengthening of Entrepreneurial Practices in the Traditional Snack Souvenir Business of Mrs. Mumun in Kopo Village, Inner Cisarua, Bogor Regency, Indonesia. 5, 22–27.
  37. Yulistya, G. I., & Rahaju, T. (2023). Implementasi program pemberdayaan masyarakat (prodamas) Plus pada bidang ekonomi di Kelurahan Bangsal Kota Kediri (studi pada Koperasi Sehat Sejahtera Erwe 2 Bangsal). Publika, 1697–1710. https://doi.org/10.26740/publika.v11n2.p1697-1710

Similar Articles

<< < 1 2 3 4 5 6 > >> 

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.