Main Article Content

Abstract

The rapid advancement of economic globalization and digitalization has brought significant changes to the dynamics of the international taxation system. This study aims to comprehensively examine international tax law and cross-border taxation based on prior literature using a Analysis Literature Review approach. This methodology involves summarizing and analyzing findings from various previous studies related to transfer pricing practices, Base Erosion and Profit Shifting (BEPS), and digital economy taxation. The results of the comparative analysis indicate that conventional taxation principles, such as the Arm's Length Principle (ALP) and source-based taxation, are increasingly inadequate in protecting the fiscal interests of developing countries against BEPS practices, transfer pricing manipulation, and digital business expansion. This article contributes theoretically to the concept of tax sovereignty and inter-nation equity by highlighting the structural gaps in current policies. Furthermore, this study recommends the strengthening of General Anti-Avoidance Rules (GAAR), the consideration of formulary apportionment, and the optimization of Automatic Exchange of Information (AEoI) as priorities for equitable international tax reform.

Keywords

BEPS International Tax Law Tax Treaty Transfer Pricing Literature Review

Article Details

How to Cite
Putri, S. W., Falah , M. N., Fitriani, L., & Pahala, I. (2026). International Tax Law and Cross-Border Taxation: A Narrative Literature Review on Tax Sovereignty, BEPS, and Global Tax Reform. Golden Ratio of Taxation Studies, 6(2), 202–214. https://doi.org/10.52970/grts.v6i2.2574

References

  1. Avi-Yonah, R. S. (2021). International Tax as International Law: An Analysis of the International Tax Regime. Cambridge University Press.
  2. Avi-Yonah, R. S. , & Xu, H. (2016). Evaluating BEPS: A reconsideration of the benefits principle and proposal for UN oversight. Harvard Business Law Review, 6(2), 185–238.
  3. Beer, S., Liu, L., & de Mooij, R. (2020). International corporate tax avoidance: A review of the channels, magnitudes, and blind spots. Journal of Economic Surveys, 34(3), 660–688.
  4. Brooks, K. (2018). Inter-nation equity: The development of an important but underappreciated international tax value. Tax Law Review, 71(4), 711–744.
  5. Christians, A. , & Magalhaes, T. (2020). Global tax governance and the return of tax sovereignty. Jus Cogens, 2(1), 3–21.
  6. Crivelli, E., de Mooij, R., & Keen, M. (2016). Base erosion, profit shifting and developing countries. FinanzArchiv: Public Finance Analysis, 72(3), 268–301.
  7. Darussalam, & Septriadi, D. (2022). Persetujuan Penghindaran Pajak Berganda: Panduan, Interpretasi, dan Aplikasi. DDTC.
  8. Devereux, M. P., & Vella, J. (2018). Implications of digitalization for international corporate tax reform. Intertax, 46(6), 550–559.
  9. Devereux, M. P., Vella, J., & Wardell-Burrus, H. (2021). Pillar 2: Rule order, interaction, and the STTR. Oxford University Centre for Business Taxation.
  10. Dietsch, P. , & Rixen, T. (2016). Global tax governance: What is wrong with it and how to fix it. ECPR Press.
  11. Dhammika, D., & Hines, J. R. (2009). Which countries become tax havens? Journal of Public Economics, 93(9–10), 1058–1068. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpubeco.2009.06.001
  12. Fisch, C., Block, J., & Sandner, P. (2022). How to use bibliometric methods for the analysis of research activity in business and economics. Journal of Business Economics, 92(1), 1–27.
  13. Fuest, C., & Riedel, N. (2019). Tax evasion and tax avoidance: The role of international profit shifting. In J. Slemrod & K. Whiteford (Eds.), The economics of tax policy (pp. 177–203). Oxford University Press.
  14. Gultom, I. M., & Wardhani, N. K. (2025). Analysis of transfer pricing practices in avoiding tax payments in Indonesia. Golden Ratio of Taxation Studies, 5(2), 87–99. https://doi.org/10.52970/grts.v5i2.1586
  15. Idrus, A. (2024). Exploring Public Finance Policies: A Qualitative Inquiry into Fiscal Policy Analysis, Government Financial Management, and Public Sector Financial Health. Golden Ratio of Finance Management, 4(2), 87–99. https://doi.org/10.52970/grfm.v4i2.481
  16. Khifni, M. , & Tehupeiory, A. (2024). Transfer pricing dan BEPS dalam pajak internasional. Jurnal Hukum Bisnis, 9(1), 30–45.
  17. Khifni, E. A., & Tehupeiory, A. (2024). Disfungsi arm's length principle dalam pengawasan transfer pricing atas intangible assets: Studi kritis terhadap sengketa pajak di Indonesia. Jurnal Hukum Bisnis dan Ekonomi, 11(1), 45–67.
  18. Kobetsky, M. (2022). International tax reform and developing countries: Assessing the equity implications of Pillar One and Pillar Two. British Tax Review. 3, 312–341.
  19. Liberati, A., Altman, D. G., Tetzlaff, J., Mulrow, C., Gøtzsche, P. C., Ioannidis, J. P. A., Clarke, M., Devereaux, P. J., Kleijnen, J., & Moher, D. (2009). The PRISMA statement for reporting systematic reviews and meta-analyses of studies that evaluate health care interventions: Explanation and elaboration. PLOS Medicine, 6(7), e1000100.
  20. Loso Judijanto, & Al-Amin. (2024). Tax treaty dan tax haven dalam penghindaran pajak internasional. Jurnal Perpajakan Indonesia, 12(2), 112–125.
  21. Moher, D., Shamseer, L., Clarke, M., Ghersi, D., Liberati, A., Petticrew, M., Shekelle, P., & Stewart, L. A. (2015). Preferred reporting items for systematic review and meta-analysis protocols (PRISMA-P) 2015 statement. Systematic Reviews, 4(1), 1–9. https://doi.org/10.1186/2046-4053-4-1
  22. Ndikumana, L. (2023). Tax justice and development finance: Reforming the global tax architecture for equitable outcomes. Development Policy Review, 41(4), e12689.
  23. Novarina, D. N. , & Rohayati, I. (2023). Penerapan pajak internasional di Indonesia. Jurnal Kajian Akuntansi, 8(1), 55–68.
  24. OECD. (2022). OECD transfer pricing guidelines for multinational enterprises and tax administrations 2022. OECD Publishing.
  25. OECD. (2023). Tax challenges arising from the digitalisation of the economy — Global anti-base erosion model rules (Pillar Two): Inclusive Framework on BEPS. OECD Publishing.
  26. OECD. (2024). Global anti-base erosion model rules (Pillar Two). OECD Publishing.
  27. OECD. (2024). Guidance on transfer pricing documentation and country-by-country reporting. OECD Publishing.
  28. OECD. (2024). Multilateral convention on mutual administrative assistance in tax matters. OECD Publishing
  29. OECD. (2024). Standard for automatic exchange of financial account information in tax matters (Common Reporting Standard). OECD Publishing.
  30. OECD. (2025). Pillar One – Amount B. OECD Publishing.
  31. Okoli, C., & Schabram, K. (2016). A guide to conducting a systematic literature review of information systems research. Sprouts: Working Papers on Information Systems, 10(26), 1–51.
  32. Paul, J. , & Criado, A. R. (2020). The art of writing literature review: What do we know and what do we need to know? International Business Review, 29(4), 101717.
  33. Permata, S. D. (2025). Penerapan penghindaran pajak berganda dalam sistem global. Jurnal Akuntansi Dan Keuangan, 15(3), 200–215.
  34. Picciotto, S. (2018). Problems of transfer pricing and possibilities for simplification. ICTD Working Paper. International Centre for Tax and Development, 86.
  35. Pratama, A. (2024). Keadilan pajak dalam transformasi ekonomi digital lintas negara. Wahana Akuntansi, 16(2), 101–115.
  36. Russo, A. (2022). The arm’s length principle in the age of globalisation: Reassessing its foundations and limits. Intertax, 50(3), 214–229.
  37. Samudera, A., & Purwati, A. (2025). Pajak, transparansi, dan tindak pidana ekonomi lintas negara. Wahana Akuntansi, 17(1), 50–65.
  38. Setiawan, R., & Rahayu, S. (2023). Analisis adopsi BEPS action plan terhadap kepatuhan multinasional. Jurnal Riset Keuangan, 10(4), 315–330.
  39. Setiawan, A., & Rahayu, S. (2023). Keterbatasan analisis kesebandingan dalam sengketa transfer pricing aset tidak berwujud di Indonesia. Jurnal Perpajakan Indonesia, 15(2), 112–134.
  40. Snyder, H. (2019). Literature review as a research methodology: An overview and guidelines. Journal of Business Research, 104, 333–339.
  41. Templier, M., & Paré, G. (2018). Transparency in literature reviews: An assessment of reporting practices across review types and genres in top IS journals. Journal of Information Systems, 27(5), 503–550.
  42. Verlinden, I., & Smits, J. (2019). Comparability analysis under the arm’s length principle: Bridging the gap between theory and practice. Nternational Transfer Pricing Journal, 26(4), 278–291.
  43. Wijaya, K. , & Santoso, B. (2024). Kesiapan negara berkembang menghadapi Pilar 1 dan Pilar 2 OECD. Jurnal Ekonomi Internasional, 14(1), 40–58.
  44. Xiao, Y., & Watson, M. (2019). Guidance on conducting a systematic literature review. Journal of Planning Education and Research, 39(1), 93–112.