Main Article Content

Abstract

This study aims to synthesize and integrate insights from economics, management, finance, and taxation to identify cross-disciplinary drivers of organizational performance. Using a qualitative systematic literature review approach, the study examines peer-reviewed journal articles, scholarly books, and authoritative policy reports published in recent years, complemented by seminal theoretical works. The analysis employs thematic synthesis to map dominant concepts, theoretical frameworks, and empirical patterns that explain how economic environments, managerial capabilities, financial governance, and tax strategies interact to shape organizational outcomes. The results indicate that organizational performance is not driven by isolated functional factors but emerges from the alignment of stable economic and institutional contexts, integrative managerial decision-making, sound financial management, and strategic yet compliant tax practices. The key finding reveals that cross-disciplinary integration enhances performance resilience, transparency, and long-term value creation, particularly in increasingly complex and regulated environments. This study contributes by providing an integrative conceptual foundation that supports future empirical research and offers strategic insights for managers and policymakers seeking sustainable organizational performance.

Keywords

Organizational Performance Cross-Disciplinary Integration Management and Finance Taxation Strategy Economic Environment

Article Details

How to Cite
Awaluddin, S. P., Khair, A. U., Zainal, A. Z., Suryani, A., & Amran, A. (2025). Integrating Economics, Management, Finance, and Taxation: A Systematic Literature Review of Cross-Disciplinary Drivers of Organizational Performance. Golden Ratio of Mapping Idea and Literature Format, 6(1), 1203–1213. https://doi.org/10.52970/grmilf.v6i1.1600

References

  1. Acemoglu, D., & Robinson, J. A. (2012). Why nations fail: The origins of power, prosperity, and poverty. Crown Business. https://doi.org/10.1355/ae29-1h
  2. Achaddiah, S. (2025). Tax governance and organizational performance under global minimum tax regimes. Journal of International Accounting Research, 24(1), 1–22. https://doi.org/10.2308/JIAR-2023-045
  3. Barney, J. (1991). Firm resources and sustained competitive advantage. Journal of Management, 17(1), 99–120. https://doi.org/10.1177/014920639101700108
  4. Besley, T., & Persson, T. (2014). Why do developing countries tax so little? Journal of Economic Perspectives, 28(4), 99–120. https://doi.org/10.1257/jep.28.4.99
  5. Denyer, D., & Tranfield, D. (2009). Producing a systematic review. In D. A. Buchanan & A. Bryman (Eds.), The Sage handbook of organizational research methods (pp. 671–689). Sage. https://doi.org/10.4135/9781848608055.n33
  6. Desai, M. A., & Dharmapala, D. (2009). Corporate tax avoidance and firm value. Review of Economics and Statistics, 91(3), 537–546. https://doi.org/10.1162/rest.91.3.537
  7. Eccles, R. G., Ioannou, I., & Serafeim, G. (2014). The impact of corporate sustainability on organizational processes and performance. Management Science, 60(11), 2835–2857. https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.2014.1984
  8. Graham, J. R., Hanlon, M., Shevlin, T., & Shroff, N. (2017). Tax rates and corporate decision-making. Review of Financial Studies, 30(9), 3128–3175. https://doi.org/10.1093/rfs/hhx037
  9. Hanlon, M., & Heitzman, S. (2010). A review of tax research. Journal of Accounting and Economics, 50(2–3), 127–178. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jacceco.2010.09.002
  10. Hansen, G. S., & Wernerfelt, B. (1989). Determinants of firm performance: The relative importance of economic and organizational factors. Strategic Management Journal, 10(5), 399–411. https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.4250100502
  11. Jensen, M. C. (2001). Value maximization, stakeholder theory, and the corporate objective function. Journal of Applied Corporate Finance, 14(3), 8–21. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1745-6622.2001.tb00434.x
  12. Kopelman, R. E., & Letzler, R. (2015). An integrated model of organizational performance. Journal of Management Policy and Practice, 16(2), 43–56. https://doi.org/10.33423/jmpp.v16i2.152
  13. La Porta, R., Lopez-de-Silanes, F., Shleifer, A., & Vishny, R. W. (2000). Agency problems and dividend policies around the world. Journal of Finance, 55(1), 1–33. https://doi.org/10.1111/0022-1082.00199
  14. North, D. C. (1990). Institutions, institutional change and economic performance. Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511808678
  15. OECD. (2021). Corporate governance and economic performance. OECD Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1787/9789264308579-en
  16. OECD. (2022). Tax administration 3.0: Digital transformation of tax administration. OECD Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1787/9789264301693-en
  17. Porter, M. E. (2008). The five competitive forces that shape strategy. Harvard Business Review, 86(1), 78–93. https://doi.org/10.1108/SD-03-2008-0013
  18. Porter, M. E., & Kramer, M. R. (2019). Creating shared value. Harvard Business Review, 97(1), 1–17. https://doi.org/10.1108/ebr-11-2019-0289
  19. Ross, S. A., Westerfield, R. W., & Jordan, B. D. (2019). Fundamentals of corporate finance (12th ed.). McGraw-Hill Education. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780429277442
  20. Sarwar, H., Mubarik, M. S., & Rehman, A. (2024). Strategic management practices and organizational performance: A systematic review. Journal of Strategy and Management, 17(1), 1–23. https://doi.org/10.1108/JSMA-06-2023-0132
  21. Tranfield, D., Denyer, D., & Smart, P. (2003). Towards a methodology for developing evidence‐informed management knowledge by means of systematic review. British Journal of Management, 14(3), 207–222. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-8551.00375
  22. UNDP. (2024). Institutional quality and sustainable organizational performance. United Nations Development Programme. https://doi.org/10.18356/9789213589876
  23. World Bank. (2023). Firm performance and institutional environments. World Bank Publications. https://doi.org/10.1596/978-1-4648-1913-1