Article Sidebar

Download
Download Article

Main Article Content

Abstract

This research aims to explore the legal and human rights implications of capital punishment, particularly in relation to the right to life as enshrined in international human rights law. The study critically examines the compatibility of the death penalty with contemporary human rights principles, focusing on its application across different legal systems. A qualitative research methodology, utilizing a systematic literature review, was employed to analyze existing scholarly works, legal documents, human rights reports, and case law related to the death penalty. The research identifies key themes such as the ethical concerns surrounding the irreversible nature of capital punishment, its lack of deterrent effect, and the racial and socioeconomic biases inherent in its application. Additionally, the study investigates the psychological and social consequences of capital punishment, including the emotional toll on both the condemned individuals and society. The findings reveal that while some countries continue to justify the death penalty, a growing global trend towards abolition is evident, fueled by concerns over human rights violations and the risks of wrongful convictions. Furthermore, the research supports the argument that the death penalty is increasingly incompatible with modern human rights standards, particularly as international legal frameworks continue to evolve. This study contributes to the broader debate on capital punishment, offering insights into its ethical, legal, and social dimensions, and calls for continued advocacy for its abolition in favor of more humane forms of justice.

Keywords

Capital Punishment Human Rights Death Penalty International Law Deterrence

Article Details

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

How to Cite
Arifullah, A. (2024). A Juridical Study of the Death Penalty from a Human Rights Perspective . Golden Ratio of Law and Social Policy Review, 4(1), 01–11. https://doi.org/10.52970/grlspr.v4i1.940
Download Citation
Endnote/Zotero/Mendeley (RIS)
BibTeX

References

  1. Abbas, I., & Putra, A. H. P. K. (2024). Utilitarianism Perspective on The Use of E-Stamps in Business Practices in Indonesia. Jurnal IUS Kajian Hukum Dan Keadilan, 12(1), 224-236.
  2. Amnesty International. (2020). Death penalty: A world-wide overview. Amnesty International. https://www.amnesty.org
  3. Baker, K. H., et al. (2017). The psychological effects of capital punishment: A review of the literature. Journal of Social Issues, 72(4), 553-572. https://doi.org/10.1111/josi.12236
  4. Baldus, D. C., Woodworth, G., & Pulaski, C. D. (1990). Equal justice and the death penalty: A legal and empirical analysis. Northeastern University Press.
  5. Bessler, J. D. (2017). The death penalty: A critique of contemporary arguments. Oxford University Press.
  6. Darmawangsa, A., Surani, S., Akil, M., Ardi, A., & Putra, A. H. P. K. (2024). The Concept Of People's Sharia Economy In The Perspective Of Dignified Justice Theory: What And How?. Pena Justisia: Media Komunikasi dan Kajian Hukum, 23(1), 1237-1251.
  7. Donohue, J. J., & Wolfers, J. (2005). The death penalty: No evidence for deterrence. Journal of Legal Studies, 34(2), 309-360. https://doi.org/10.1086/425054
  8. Ehrlich, I. (1975). The deterrent effect of capital punishment: A question of life and death. Journal of Political Economy, 83(4), 741-763. https://doi.org/10.1086/260347
  9. Human Rights Watch. (2019). The death penalty: A global perspective. https://www.hrw.org
  10. Hutabarat, D. N. M., & Manullang, H. (2025). Legal Analysis of Crimes Committed Through Shell Companies and The Role of Prosecutors in Combating Such Crimes. Golden Ratio of Data in Summary, 5(1), 62 - 71. https://doi.org/10.52970/grdis.v5i1.824
  11. Laoly, G. A. K., & Simamora, J. (2025). The Role of Immigration in Preventing the Crime of Trafficking in Persons (TTPO). Golden Ratio of Data in Summary, 5(1), 50 - 61. https://doi.org/10.52970/grdis.v5i1.836
  12. Lestari, S. D., Leon, F. M., Riyadi, S., & Putra, A. H. P. K. (2024). Comparison and implementation of environmental law policies in handling climate change in ASEAN countries: a comparative study of Indonesia, Malaysia, and Thailand. International Journal of Energy Economics and Policy, 14(2), 687-700.
  13. Lester, D., & O’Rourke, M. (2018). The ethics of retribution in capital punishment. Routledge.
  14. Nagin, D. S. (2013). Deterrence and the death penalty: The case for abolition. Crime and Justice, 42(1), 1-66. https://doi.org/10.1086/670345
  15. Pojman, L. P. (2006). The death penalty: For and against. Rowman & Littlefield.
  16. Radelet, M. L., & Lacock, T. (2009). Do executions lower homicide rates? The views of leading criminologists. Journal of Criminal Law and Criminology, 99(3), 489-512. https://doi.org/10.2307/20529080
  17. Rasmussen, M. L. (2018). The global movement to abolish the death penalty. Routledge.
  18. Scheck, B., Neufeld, P., & Dwyer, J. (2000). Actual innocence: When justice goes wrong and how to make it right. Doubleday.
  19. Siahaan, D. S., & Simamora, J. (2024). The Role and Responsibilities of Public Prosecutors at the Binjai District Attorney’s Office in the Criminal Justice Process. Golden Ratio of Data in Summary, 5(1), 07 - 14. https://doi.org/10.52970/grdis.v5i1.805
  20. Steiker, C. S., & Steiker, J. M. (2016). The death penalty: A civil rights issue. Harvard Law Review, 129(4), 1166-1202. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2742849
  21. United Nations General Assembly. (1966). International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights. UN General Assembly, Resolution 2200A(XXI).
  22. United Nations Human Rights Office. (2021). The death penalty: Human rights issues. https://www.ohchr.org
  23. United Nations. (1948). Universal Declaration of Human Rights. UN General Assembly, Resolution 217 A(III).
  24. Zimring, F. E. (2003). The death penalty in America: Current controversies. Oxford University Press.
  25. Zimring, F. E., & Hawkins, G. (2015). The global decline of the death penalty: A review of its history and current challenges. Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781107279373