Article Sidebar

Download
Download Article

Main Article Content

Abstract

This study aims to find out the legal arrangements regarding abandoned land  regarding land ownership rights and find out the legal remedies that can be  taken by holders of ownership rights over abandoned land. This study uses the  Normative legal research method, namely approaching legal norms or  substance, legal principles, legal theory, legal arguments and comparative law.  The results of this study indicate that overcoming the abandoned land  phenomenon is a big task for the government. Based on this reason, Government  Regulation No. 20 of 2021 concerning Controlling Abandoned Areas and Lands  and participating in implementing Law Number 5 of 1960 concerning Basic  Agrarian Basic Regulations. The erasure of land rights due to neglect. Through  the inventory stage which is carried out no later than 2 (two) years from the  issuance of land rights, management rights, or basis of land tenure. The results  of this implementation are then processed into land data indicated as  abandoned, divided into 3 stages, Abandoned Land Evaluation, Abandoned  Land Warning and Abandoned Land Determination. Legal remedies taken by  landowners who have been neglected through ordinary legal remedies and  extraordinary legal remedies. Besides that, through non-litigation channels,  namely, arbitration, negotiation, mediation, conciliation, expert reasoning. The  author's recommendation is the need to carry out supervision and counseling  regarding procedures regarding the importance of ownership of land rights. To  the public, in this case the owner of land rights should have consideration in  choosing legal remedies that are not always only through litigation or court.  However, many things must be considered, such as the relatively long time,  unmeasured costs, court decisions often cannot be executed immediately, and  often court decisions are colored by the interference of other parties. Therefore,  it is necessary to reconsider the settlement through non-litigation channels  which is actually faster and cheaper than through litigation which has many  obstacles.

Keywords

Land Abandonend Land Property Rights

Article Details

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

How to Cite
Diana, D., & Aswari, A. (2024). Legal Arrangements and Remedies for Abandoned Land: A Normative Study. Golden Ratio of Law and Social Policy Review, 2(2), 23–33. https://doi.org/10.52970/grlspr.v2i2.293
Download Citation
Endnote/Zotero/Mendeley (RIS)
BibTeX

References

  1. Afriyandi, T. (2018). Kewenangan Pemerintah Daerah dalam Menentukan Harga Jual Dalam Transaksi Jual Beli Tanah dan Atau Bangunan. Jurnal Hukum Volkgeist, 3(1 SE-Articles). https://doi.org/10.35326/volkgeist.v3i1.112
  2. Amir, A. (2019). Pengalihn Hak Penguasaan Tanah Menurut UUPA dalam Rangka Pendaftaran Tanah Pertama Kali. Repertorium Jurnal Ilmiah Hukum Kenotariatan, 8(1), 53. https://doi.org/10.28946/rpt.v8i1.311
  3. Arwana, Y. C., & Arifin, R. (2019). Jalur Mediasi dalam Penyelesaian Sengketa Pertanahan Sebagai Dorongan Pemenuhan Hak Asasi Manusia. Jambura Law Review, 1(2), 212–236. https://doi.org/10.33756/jalrev.v1i2.2399
  4. Chandra, T. (2019). Non-Litigation Process Land Dispute Settlement For Legal Certainty. Substantive Justice International Journal of Law; Vol 2 No 2 (2019): Substantive Justice International Journal of LawDO - 10.33096/Substantivejustice.V2i2.49 . https://www.substantivejustice.id/index.php/sucila/article/view/49
  5. Elbert, E., & Fernando, G. (2021). Analisa Hukum Atas Tanah Hak Milik Yang Terlantar Berdasarkan Peraturan Pemerintah No. 20 Tahun 2021 Tentang Penerbitan Kawasan Dan Tanah Terlantar. Jurnal Hukum Adigama, 4(2), 2945–2968. https://doi.org/10.24912/adigama.v4i2.17877
  6. Gatra, D., Pasamai, S., Kadir, H., Buana, A. P., & Aswari, A. (2018). Stagnancy of Land Use Arrangement Former Cultivation Rights. Substantive Justice International Journal of Law, 1(1), 1. https://doi.org/10.33096/substantivejustice.v1i1.14
  7. Hasbi, H. (2020a). Alternatif Penyelesaian Sengketa Pertanahan Melalui Proses Mediasi di Badan Pertanahan Kota Makassar. Pleno Jure, 9(1), 36–46. https://doi.org/10.37541/plenojure.v9i1.299
  8. Hasbi, H. (2020b). Alternatif Penyelesaian Sengketa Pertanahan Melalui Proses Mediasi di Badan Pertanahan Kota Makassar. PLENO JURE, 9(1), 36–46. https://doi.org/10.37541/PLENOJURE.V9I1.299
  9. Irwanda, A., Hasibuan, F. Y., & Maryano, M. (2023). Analyzing the Agrarian Conflict Between Administrative Court and General Court. International Journal of Educational Research Excellence (IJERE), 2(1 SE-Articles), 1–9. https://doi.org/10.55299/ijere.v2i1.401
  10. Kartono, S. A. (2020). Politik Hukum Pertanahan Dalam Rangka Percepatan Pendaftaran Tanah Di Indonesia. Jurnal Esensi Hukum, 2(1 SE-Articles). https://doi.org/10.35586/esensihukum.v2i1.17
  11. Middin, M. A., Salle, S., & Aswari, A. (2021). Menakar Faktor Penghambat Dalam Mewujudkan Kepastian Hukum Dibidang Pertanahan. PLENO JURE, 10(2), 115–121. https://doi.org/10.37541/PLENOJURE.V10I2.608
  12. Mujiburohman, D. A. (2018). Potensi Permasalahan Pendaftaran Tanah Sistematik Lengkap (PTSL). BHUMI: Jurnal Agraria Dan Pertanahan, 4(1 SE-Articles), 88–101. https://doi.org/10.31292/jb.v4i1.217
  13. Nurdin, M. (2022). Urgensi Pembentukan Bank Tanah di Indonesia. Gorontalo Law Review, 5(2), 385–390. https://doi.org/10.32662/golrev.v5i2.2383
  14. Prakoso, B. (2021). Pendaftaran Tanah Sistematis Lengkap Sebagai Dasar Perubahan Sistem Publikasi Pendaftaran Tanah. Journal of Private and Economic Law; Vol 1 No 1 (2021): May 2021DO - 10.19184/Jpel.V1i1.23859, 1(1), 63–82. https://doi.org/10.19184/jpel.v1i1.23859
  15. Prasista, P. A. D., Wijaya, K. K. A., & ... (2022). Pengaturan Tanah Terlantar dalam Peraturan Perundang-Undangan di Bidang Pertanahan. Jurnal Konstruksi …, 3(3), 515–520. https://doi.org/10.55637/jkh.3.3.5320.515-520
  16. Puhi, O., Akili, R. H., Ahmad, I., Moonti, R. M., & Nuna, M. (2021). Urgensi Beracara di Pengadilan Perdata Terhadap Hukum Acara perdata. Pleno Jure, 10(1), 25–37. https://doi.org/10.37541/plenojure.v10i1.554
  17. Ramadhani, R. (2021). Legal Protection for Land Rights Holders Who Are Victims of the Land Mafia. International Journal Reglement & Society (IJRS, 2(2), 87–95. https://doi.org/10.55357/ijrs.v2i2.114
  18. Sahnan, S., Arba, M., & Suhartana, L. W. P. (2019). Kewenangan Badan Pertanahan Nasional Dalam Penyelesaian Sengketa Pertanahan. Jurnal IUS Kajian Hukum Dan Keadilan, 7(3 SE-Articles), 436–450. https://doi.org/10.29303/ius.v7i3.714
  19. Sitorus, S. (2020). Upaya Hukum Dalam Perkara Perdata (Verzet, Banding, Kasasi, Peninjauan Kembali dan Derden Verzet). Hikmah, 15(1 SE-), 63–71. http://e-jurnal.staisumatera-medan.ac.id/index.php/hikmah/article/view/29
  20. Sri Murni, C. (2018). Peralihan Hak Atas Tanah Tanpa Sertifikat. Lex Librum, 4(2), 680–692. https://doi.org/10.46839/lljih.v4i2.108
  21. van der Muur, W. (2018). Forest conflicts and the informal nature of realizing indigenous land rights in Indonesia. Citizenship Studies, 22(2), 160–174. https://doi.org/10.1080/13621025.2018.1445495
  22. Verawati, R., Riezqa Salshadilla, W. V., & Al-Fatih, S. (2020). Kewenangan dan peran peraturan daerah dalam menyelesaikan sengketa agraria. Ekspose: Jurnal Penelitian Hukum Dan Pendidikan, 19(2). https://doi.org/10.30863/ekspose.v19i2.1146
  23. Wiguna, M. O. C. (2018). Peluang Penyelesaian Sengketa Perdata Tentang Tanah Melalui Alternative Dispute Resolution. Masalah-Masalah Hukum, 47(1), 47–55. https://doi.org/10.14710/mmh.47.1.2018.47-55
  24. Zein, S. (2014). Reformasi Agraria Dari Dulu Hingga Sekarang Di Indonesia. Jurnal Ilmiah Hukum Dirgantara, 9(2), 121–135. https://doi.org/10.35968/jh.v9i2.357