Legal Arrangements and Remedies for Abandoned Land: A Normative Study
Article Sidebar
Main Article Content
Abstract
This study aims to find out the legal arrangements regarding abandoned land regarding land ownership rights and find out the legal remedies that can be taken by holders of ownership rights over abandoned land. This study uses the Normative legal research method, namely approaching legal norms or substance, legal principles, legal theory, legal arguments and comparative law. The results of this study indicate that overcoming the abandoned land phenomenon is a big task for the government. Based on this reason, Government Regulation No. 20 of 2021 concerning Controlling Abandoned Areas and Lands and participating in implementing Law Number 5 of 1960 concerning Basic Agrarian Basic Regulations. The erasure of land rights due to neglect. Through the inventory stage which is carried out no later than 2 (two) years from the issuance of land rights, management rights, or basis of land tenure. The results of this implementation are then processed into land data indicated as abandoned, divided into 3 stages, Abandoned Land Evaluation, Abandoned Land Warning and Abandoned Land Determination. Legal remedies taken by landowners who have been neglected through ordinary legal remedies and extraordinary legal remedies. Besides that, through non-litigation channels, namely, arbitration, negotiation, mediation, conciliation, expert reasoning. The author's recommendation is the need to carry out supervision and counseling regarding procedures regarding the importance of ownership of land rights. To the public, in this case the owner of land rights should have consideration in choosing legal remedies that are not always only through litigation or court. However, many things must be considered, such as the relatively long time, unmeasured costs, court decisions often cannot be executed immediately, and often court decisions are colored by the interference of other parties. Therefore, it is necessary to reconsider the settlement through non-litigation channels which is actually faster and cheaper than through litigation which has many obstacles.
Article Details
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
References
Afriyandi, T. (2018). Kewenangan Pemerintah Daerah dalam Menentukan Harga Jual Dalam Transaksi Jual Beli Tanah dan Atau Bangunan. Jurnal Hukum Volkgeist, 3(1 SE-Articles). https://doi.org/10.35326/volkgeist.v3i1.112
Amir, A. (2019). Pengalihn Hak Penguasaan Tanah Menurut UUPA dalam Rangka Pendaftaran Tanah Pertama Kali. Repertorium Jurnal Ilmiah Hukum Kenotariatan, 8(1), 53. https://doi.org/10.28946/rpt.v8i1.311
Arwana, Y. C., & Arifin, R. (2019). Jalur Mediasi dalam Penyelesaian Sengketa Pertanahan Sebagai Dorongan Pemenuhan Hak Asasi Manusia. Jambura Law Review, 1(2), 212–236. https://doi.org/10.33756/jalrev.v1i2.2399
Chandra, T. (2019). Non-Litigation Process Land Dispute Settlement For Legal Certainty. Substantive Justice International Journal of Law; Vol 2 No 2 (2019): Substantive Justice International Journal of LawDO - 10.33096/Substantivejustice.V2i2.49 . https://www.substantivejustice.id/index.php/sucila/article/view/49
Elbert, E., & Fernando, G. (2021). Analisa Hukum Atas Tanah Hak Milik Yang Terlantar Berdasarkan Peraturan Pemerintah No. 20 Tahun 2021 Tentang Penerbitan Kawasan Dan Tanah Terlantar. Jurnal Hukum Adigama, 4(2), 2945–2968. https://doi.org/10.24912/adigama.v4i2.17877
Gatra, D., Pasamai, S., Kadir, H., Buana, A. P., & Aswari, A. (2018). Stagnancy of Land Use Arrangement Former Cultivation Rights. Substantive Justice International Journal of Law, 1(1), 1. https://doi.org/10.33096/substantivejustice.v1i1.14
Hasbi, H. (2020a). Alternatif Penyelesaian Sengketa Pertanahan Melalui Proses Mediasi di Badan Pertanahan Kota Makassar. Pleno Jure, 9(1), 36–46. https://doi.org/10.37541/plenojure.v9i1.299
Hasbi, H. (2020b). Alternatif Penyelesaian Sengketa Pertanahan Melalui Proses Mediasi di Badan Pertanahan Kota Makassar. PLENO JURE, 9(1), 36–46. https://doi.org/10.37541/PLENOJURE.V9I1.299
Irwanda, A., Hasibuan, F. Y., & Maryano, M. (2023). Analyzing the Agrarian Conflict Between Administrative Court and General Court. International Journal of Educational Research Excellence (IJERE), 2(1 SE-Articles), 1–9. https://doi.org/10.55299/ijere.v2i1.401
Kartono, S. A. (2020). Politik Hukum Pertanahan Dalam Rangka Percepatan Pendaftaran Tanah Di Indonesia. Jurnal Esensi Hukum, 2(1 SE-Articles). https://doi.org/10.35586/esensihukum.v2i1.17
Middin, M. A., Salle, S., & Aswari, A. (2021). Menakar Faktor Penghambat Dalam Mewujudkan Kepastian Hukum Dibidang Pertanahan. PLENO JURE, 10(2), 115–121. https://doi.org/10.37541/PLENOJURE.V10I2.608
Mujiburohman, D. A. (2018). Potensi Permasalahan Pendaftaran Tanah Sistematik Lengkap (PTSL). BHUMI: Jurnal Agraria Dan Pertanahan, 4(1 SE-Articles), 88–101. https://doi.org/10.31292/jb.v4i1.217
Nurdin, M. (2022). Urgensi Pembentukan Bank Tanah di Indonesia. Gorontalo Law Review, 5(2), 385–390. https://doi.org/10.32662/golrev.v5i2.2383
Prakoso, B. (2021). Pendaftaran Tanah Sistematis Lengkap Sebagai Dasar Perubahan Sistem Publikasi Pendaftaran Tanah. Journal of Private and Economic Law; Vol 1 No 1 (2021): May 2021DO - 10.19184/Jpel.V1i1.23859, 1(1), 63–82. https://doi.org/10.19184/jpel.v1i1.23859
Prasista, P. A. D., Wijaya, K. K. A., & ... (2022). Pengaturan Tanah Terlantar dalam Peraturan Perundang-Undangan di Bidang Pertanahan. Jurnal Konstruksi …, 3(3), 515–520. https://doi.org/10.55637/jkh.3.3.5320.515-520
Puhi, O., Akili, R. H., Ahmad, I., Moonti, R. M., & Nuna, M. (2021). Urgensi Beracara di Pengadilan Perdata Terhadap Hukum Acara perdata. Pleno Jure, 10(1), 25–37. https://doi.org/10.37541/plenojure.v10i1.554
Ramadhani, R. (2021). Legal Protection for Land Rights Holders Who Are Victims of the Land Mafia. International Journal Reglement & Society (IJRS, 2(2), 87–95. https://doi.org/10.55357/ijrs.v2i2.114
Sahnan, S., Arba, M., & Suhartana, L. W. P. (2019). Kewenangan Badan Pertanahan Nasional Dalam Penyelesaian Sengketa Pertanahan. Jurnal IUS Kajian Hukum Dan Keadilan, 7(3 SE-Articles), 436–450. https://doi.org/10.29303/ius.v7i3.714
Sitorus, S. (2020). Upaya Hukum Dalam Perkara Perdata (Verzet, Banding, Kasasi, Peninjauan Kembali dan Derden Verzet). Hikmah, 15(1 SE-), 63–71. http://e-jurnal.staisumatera-medan.ac.id/index.php/hikmah/article/view/29
Sri Murni, C. (2018). Peralihan Hak Atas Tanah Tanpa Sertifikat. Lex Librum, 4(2), 680–692. https://doi.org/10.46839/lljih.v4i2.108
van der Muur, W. (2018). Forest conflicts and the informal nature of realizing indigenous land rights in Indonesia. Citizenship Studies, 22(2), 160–174. https://doi.org/10.1080/13621025.2018.1445495
Verawati, R., Riezqa Salshadilla, W. V., & Al-Fatih, S. (2020). Kewenangan dan peran peraturan daerah dalam menyelesaikan sengketa agraria. Ekspose: Jurnal Penelitian Hukum Dan Pendidikan, 19(2). https://doi.org/10.30863/ekspose.v19i2.1146
Wiguna, M. O. C. (2018). Peluang Penyelesaian Sengketa Perdata Tentang Tanah Melalui Alternative Dispute Resolution. Masalah-Masalah Hukum, 47(1), 47–55. https://doi.org/10.14710/mmh.47.1.2018.47-55
Zein, S. (2014). Reformasi Agraria Dari Dulu Hingga Sekarang Di Indonesia. Jurnal Ilmiah Hukum Dirgantara, 9(2), 121–135. https://doi.org/10.35968/jh.v9i2.357