Article Sidebar

Download
Download Article

Main Article Content

Abstract

This article discusses supervision of the sub-district head as an official who makes temporary land deeds who violates statutory provisions. The aim is only to provide an overview of the supervision of sub-district heads carried out by the Board of Trustees and Supervisors of officials who make land deeds. The research method used in this article is normative legal research. The results of the research illustrate that supervision by the PPAT supervisory board and supervisors in carrying out guidance and supervision of PPATS, the supervision is not yet comprehensive. This is in Ministerial Regulation Number 2 of 2018, PPAT Guidance and Supervision has not been able to answer substantively regarding the guidance and supervision by PPATS where the position of a PPATS is ex officio so that the guidance and supervision both internally and externally carried out by the National Land Agency is only functional.

Keywords

Supervision Sub-district Head Temporary Deeds

Article Details

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

How to Cite
Saputra, T. E., & Rustan, R. (2023). Supervision of Subdistrict Heads as Temporary Deed Making Officials in the Indonesian Positive Law Perspective. Golden Ratio of Law and Social Policy Review, 3(1), 36–48. https://doi.org/10.52970/grlspr.v3i1.287
Download Citation
Endnote/Zotero/Mendeley (RIS)
BibTeX

References

  1. Adjie, H. (2014). Merajut Pemikiran dalam Dunia Notaris dan PPAT (Cetakan II). Citra Aditya Bakti.
  2. Ardhanary, D. C. (2021). Implikasi Hukum Peraturan Pelayanan Hak Taggungan Secara Elektronik Terhadap Ppat Dan Kreditur di Kota Yogyakarta. Officium Notarium, 1(1 SE-Articles), 60–69. https://doi.org/10.20885/JON.vol1.iss1.art7
  3. Aswari, A., Pasamai, S., Qamar, N., & Abbas, I. (2017). Legal Security on Cellphone Trading Through Electronic Media in Indonesia. Dinamika Hukum, 17(2), 181–187. http://dx.doi.org/10.20884/1.jdh.2017.17.2.800
  4. Butarbutar, A. H., Lubis, M. Y., Syafruddin Kalo, & Sunarmi. (2022). Transparansi Dan Akuntabilitas Dalam Kebijakan Penentuan Tarif Biaya Transportasi Dan Akomodasi Dalam Pendaftaran Tanah Pertama Kali Di Kantor Pertanahan Kabupaten Toba Samosir. Locus: Jurnal Konsep Ilmu Hukum, 2(1 SE-Artikel), 254–269. https://jurnal.locusmedia.id/index.php/jkih/article/view/40
  5. Darusman, Y. M. (2016). Kedudukan notaris sebagai pejabat pembuat akta otentik dan sebagai pejabat pembuat akta tanah. Adil Jurnal Hukum, 7(1). https://doi.org/10.33476/ajl.v7i1.331
  6. Duxbury, N. (2015). The Law of the Land. The Modern Law Review, 78(1), 26–54. https://doi.org/10.1111/1468-2230.12105
  7. Effendi, T., Fatmawati, J. R. S., Labu, P., & Selatan, J. (2020). Penerapan Delik Penyertaan Terhadap Notaris/PPAT Dalam Tindak Pidana Korupsi. National Conference For Law Studies : Pembangunan Hukum Menuju Era Digital Society, 978–979.
  8. Faridah, K., Khalimi, K., & Ismed, M. (2023). Kepastian Hukum dan Pengawasan Honorarium PPAT sebagai Upaya untuk Penyetaraan Pelayanan dan Mewujudkan Keadilan bagi Masyarakat. Perfecto: Jurnal Ilmu Hukum, 1(2). https://doi.org/10.32884/jih.v1i2.1438
  9. Frederiksen, T., & Himley, M. (2020). Tactics of dispossession: Access, power, and subjectivity at the extractive frontier. Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers, 45(1), 50–64. https://doi.org/10.1111/tran.12329
  10. Govianda, C., Silviana, A., & Adhim, N. (2019). Kepastian Hukum Bagi Pemegang Sertipikat Hak Atas Tanah Dalam Hal Terdapat Pembatalan Sertipikat Melalui Putusan Pengadilan (Studi Kasus Putusan PTUN Nomor: 15/G/2014/PTUN-TPI di Kota Batam). Diponegoro Law Journal, 8(2). https://doi.org/10.14710/dlj.2019.25408
  11. Gunawan, Ak. Y., Saraswati, R., & Silviana, A. (2023). Legal Protection Against Land Encroachment Of Public Facilities In Indonesia That Is Equitable. SSRN, 63(November), 573–580. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.4630343
  12. Habibah, H. R. W. N., Suharno, S., & Muryono, S. (2019). Aspek Tata Guna Tanah dalam Pertimbangan Teknis Pertanahan untuk Mewujudkan Pembangunan Berkelanjutan. Tunas Agraria, 2(1 SE-Artikel), 70–94. https://doi.org/10.31292/jta.v2i1.18
  13. Idrison, I. (2022). Perlindungan Hukum Terhadap Pns Dan Pensiunan Pns Dalam Penerapan Tarif Penerimaan Negara Bukan Pajak Pada Kegiatan Pelayanan Pertanahan. Unes Journal of Swara Justisia, 6(3 SE-Articles), 268–281. https://doi.org/10.31933/ujsj.v6i3.284
  14. Iryadi, I. (2019). Kedudukan Akta Otentik dalam Hubungannya dengan Hak Konstitusional Warga Negara. Jurnal Konstitusi, 15(4 SE-Articles), 796–815. https://doi.org/10.31078/jk1546
  15. Klaasen, A. (2020). The quest for socio-economic rights: The rule of law and violent protest in South Africa. Sustainable Development, 28(3), 478–484. https://doi.org/10.1002/sd.2038
  16. Kumara, I. M. C. G., Wijaya, I. K. K. A., & Suryani, L. P. (2021). Kepastian Hukum Pemegang Hak atas Tanah dalam Sistem Hukum Pertanahan di Indonesia. Jurnal Preferensi Hukum, 2(3 SE-Articles), 560–563. https://doi.org/10.22225/jph.2.3.4013.560-563
  17. Li, H., & Zhu, J. (2023). Property rights and land quality. American Journal of Agricultural Economics, n/a(n/a). https://doi.org/10.1111/ajae.12440
  18. Lubis, U. A. P. (2020). Analisis Yuridis Pertanggungjawaban Notaris terhadap Pemalsuan Tanda Tangan oleh Penghadap dalam Akta Autentik. Jurnal SOMASI (Sosial Humaniora Komunikasi), 1(1), 81–91. https://doi.org/10.53695/JS.V1I1.36
  19. Maulana, A., Utami, C., & Suryana, Y. (2022). An Implementation Review of The Program of Complete Systematic Land Registration in Indonesia. Kolaborasi: Jurnal Administrasi Publik, 8(1), 35–52. https://doi.org/10.26618/kjap.v8i1.7184
  20. Oktavia, S. L., Respationo, S., Erniyanti, E., Nofrial, R., & Tartib, M. (2023). Legal analysis of the distribution of inheritance in the form of land rights to foreign national heirs. Journal of Multidisciplinary Academic Business Studies, 1(1 SE-Articles), 81–89. https://doi.org/10.35912/jomabs.v1i1.1815
  21. Pangaribuan, M., Simanungkalit, D., Sinaga, E., Hutapea, N., Harahap, P., Mikael, G., & Nababan, R. (2023). Kepastian Hukum dalam Tanah adat dan UUPA yang mengatur Mengenai Tanah Adat. Jaksa : Jurnal Kajian Ilmu Hukum Dan Politik, 2(1 SE-Articles). https://doi.org/10.51903/jaksa.v2i1.1576
  22. Puspa Sari, R. M., & Gunarto, G. (2018). Peranan PPAT Dalam Pensertifikatan Tanah Akibat Jual Beli. Jurnal Akta, 5(1), 241. https://doi.org/10.30659/akta.v5i1.2553
  23. Santoso, U. (2010). Pelepasan Hak Atas Tanah Untuk Kepentingan Perusahaan Swasta. Perspektif, XV(3), 321–334. https://doi.org/10.30742/perspektif.v15i3.58
  24. Sari, R. F., & Sa’adah, N. (2022). Penunjukan Camat Sebagai Ppat Sementara Di Wilayah Kerja Yang Formasi PPAT Telah Terpenuhi. Notarius, 15(1). https://doi.org/10.14710/nts.v15i1.46051
  25. Sumargo, B. (2002). Perkembangan Teori Sewa Tanah dalam Perspektif Pemikiran Ekonomi. The Winners, 3(2), 188. https://doi.org/10.21512/tw.v3i2.3850
  26. Tamano, K. (2021). Deliberative Democracy and the Paradox of Participation. International Journal of Japanese Sociology, 30(1), 122–139. https://doi.org/10.1111/ijjs.12116
  27. Utomo, H. I. W. (2022). Legal Counseling By a Notary As a Means To Produce a Balanced Agreement. NOTARIIL Jurnal Kenotariatan, 7(1), 1–8. https://doi.org/10.22225/jn.7.1.2022.1-8
  28. Wideman, T. J., & Lombardo, N. (2019). Geographies of land use: Planning, property, and law. Geography Compass, 13(12), e12473. https://doi.org/10.1111/gec3.12473