Article Sidebar

Download
Download Article

Main Article Content

Abstract

An independent judiciary is a fundamental requirement of a state that is governed by the rule of law. However, judicial independence may be undermined when court proceedings are disrupted, judicial orders are disregarded, or judges are subjected to intimidation through contempt of court. This study aims to compare the substantive and procedural regulations of contempt of court in the United States and Indonesia and formulate an adaptive model for legal reform in Indonesia. This study employs a normative juridical method using statutory, comparative, conceptual, and case-based approaches. The legal materials analyzed include 18 U.S.C. § 401, Federal Rule of Criminal Procedure 42, Law Number 1 of 2023 concerning the Criminal Code, and Law Number 20 of 2025 concerning the Criminal Procedure Code. The findings indicate that the United States regulates contempt of court through the doctrine of inherent judicial power, supported by substantive authority and procedural safeguards, including summary proceedings for direct contempt. Indonesia has made significant progress by codifying offenses against the administration of justice; however, it still lacks a specific procedural mechanism for addressing direct contempt swiftly and proportionately. This study argues that Indonesia should adopt an adaptive framework consisting of clear definitions, functional classifications, proportional sanctions, limited summary proceedings, and safeguards to ensure due processes and freedom of expression. This study contributes to ongoing legal reform efforts by proposing a balanced model that protects judicial authority while preventing the misuse of contempt powers.

Keywords

Contempt of Court Judicial Independence Due Process Adaptive Legal Transplantation Criminal Law Reform

Article Details

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

How to Cite
Salman, M., & Rosa Tedjabuana. (2026). Contempt of Court: A Comparison of U.S. Regulations and Their Implications for Legal Reform in Indonesia. Golden Ratio of Law and Social Policy Review, 5(2), 447–460. https://doi.org/10.52970/grlspr.v5i2.2246
Download Citation
Endnote/Zotero/Mendeley (RIS)
BibTeX

References

  1. 18 U.S.C. § 401. (2024). Power of court. United States Code.
  2. Achmad, A., & Mubarani, A. S. (2025). Implications of Violations of the Advocate Code of Ethics on Public Trust (Case Study: Desrizal Chaniago). 3(3), 881–887. https://doi.org/doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.17084980
  3. Administrative Office of the U.S. Courts. (2024). Federal Judicial Caseload Statistics 2024. United States Courts. https://www.uscourts.gov/data-news/reports/statistical-reports/federal-judicial-caseload-statistics/federal-judicial-caseload-statistics-2024
  4. Administrative Office of the U.S. Courts. (2024). Judicial business 2024. United States Courts. https://www.uscourts.gov/data-news/reports/statistical-reports/judicial-business-united-states-courts/judicial-business-2024
  5. Ansyahrul. (2025). Forty Years of Struggle Demanding the Establishment of a Law on Contempt of Court. Dandapala. https://dandapala.com/opini/detail/40-tahun-perjuangan-menuntut-dibentuknya-uu-tentang-contempt-of-court
  6. Arief, B. N. (2017). Compilation of Criminal Law Policy (6th ed.). Kencana.
  7. Arintyas, A. P. R. D. A., Aristi, S., & Maulana, M. A. (2026). From hashtag to policy: Viral anger and lawmaking in Indonesia’s digital democracy. Golden Ratio of Law and Social Policy Review, 5(2), 337–348. https://doi.org/10.52970/grlspr.v5i2.1949
  8. Aulia, M. Z. (2018). Progressive Law of Satjipto Rahardjo: History, Urgency, and Relevance. 1(1), 159–185. https://doi.org/10.22437/ujh.1.1.159-185
  9. Bureau of Law and Public Relations, Administrative Affairs Agency, & Supreme Court of the Republic of Indonesia. (2025). Magazine Issue 37: Contempt of Court.
  10. Black, H. C. (2024). Black’s Law Dictionary (B. A. Garner (Ed.); 12th ed.). Thomson Reuters.
  11. Budiyono, T. (2009). Legal Transplantation: Harmonization and Potential Conflicts (12th Edition). Griya Media.
  12. Cornell Law School. (2022a). Contempt of Court, Civil. https://www.law.cornell.edu/wex/contempt_of_court_civil
  13. Cornell Law School. (2022b). Contempt of Court, Criminal. https://www.law.cornell.edu/wex/contempt_of_court_criminal
  14. Dann, P., Bönnemann, M., & Herklotz, T. (2018). Of Apples and Mangoes: A Comparison of the European Union and India. The Indian Yearbook of Comparative Law 2016. Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780199482139.003.0001
  15. Djula, S. R. (2019). The Formation of the Contempt of Court Law to Maintain the Dignity of the Judiciary in Indonesia. Estudiante Law Journal, 1(1), 223–241. https://doi.org/10.33756/eslaj.v1i1.13301
  16. Djula, S. R., Wantu, F. M., & Ismail, D. E. (2025). Construction of the Contempt of Court Regulation in Indonesia. 2(2). https://doi.org/doi.org/10.62951/ijlcj.v2i2.604
  17. Federal Rule of Criminal Procedure 42: Criminal Contempt (1938).
  18. The Federal Judicial Center. (2025). The Contempt Power of Federal Courts. Retrieved June 28, 2025, from https://www.fjc.gov/history/work-courts/contempt-power-federal-courts
  19. Federal Rule of Criminal Procedure, Rule 42. (2024). Criminal contempt. Federal Rules of Criminal Procedures.
  20. Firdaus, M. I. (2023). Offense of Contempt Against the Government in Law Number 1 of 2023 Concerning the Criminal Code from a Constitutionalism Perspective. 4(2), 55–67.
  21. Hadi, S. (2015). Research Methodology. Pustaka Pelajar.
  22. Hartono, S. (1991). Selected Topics in Comparative Law (7th ed.). Citra Aditya Bakti.
  23. Haykal, S. D., & Wulandari, C. (2025). Law Enforcement for Lawyers Committing Contempt of Court in the Criminal Justice System in Indonesia: A Comparison with Thailand. 5(3), 466–474. https://doi.org/Doi.org/10.47268/pamali.v5i3.3232
  24. Hinds, A. C. (1907). Hinds’ Precedents of the House of Representatives of the United States (vol. 3, Chapter 63). https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/GPO-HPREC-HINDS-V3/pdf/GPO-HPREC-HINDS-V3-22.pdf
  25. The 1945 Constitution of the Republic of Indonesia.
  26. Indonesia. (2026). Criminal Procedure Code 2025 (KUHAP) (1st ed.). Sinar Grafika.
  27. Indonesia. (2023). Law Number 1 of 2023 on Criminal Code. Government of the Republic of Indonesia.
  28. Indonesia. (2025). Law Number 20 of 2025, Criminal Procedure Code. Government of the Republic of Indonesia.
  29. Jaslow, K. R. (2019). Life in Jail for Misbehavior: Criminal Contempt and Consequences of Improper Classification. Florida Law Review, 71(2).
  30. Koentjaraningrat. (2017). Social Research Methods. PT. Gramedia Pustaka Utama.
  31. Mahmud Marzuki, P. (2017). Legal Research: A Revised Edition. Kencana.
  32. Mauer, J. (2024). Clarifying Contempt in Civil Cases: Appropriate Uses in Florida. Suffolk Journal of Trial & Appellate Advocacy, 29(1), 1–35. https://dc.suffolk.edu/jtaa-suffolk/vol29/iss1/5/
  33. Muhammad, R. (2019). Reforming Indonesian Criminal Law. UII Press.
  34. Mulyadi, L., & Suharyanto, B. (2016). Contempt of Court in Indonesia (1st ed.). PT Alumni.
  35. Pettanasse, I., Rani, F. H., Saputra, M. A., & Ardha, D. J. (2024). The Crime of “Obstruction of Justice” in the Regulation of Law Number 1 of 2023. Journal of Sharia and Legal Science, 2(2), 163–177. https://doi.org/10.61994/jsls.v2i2.651
  36. Rahardjo, S. (2009). Progressive Law: A Synthesis of Indonesian Law. Genta Publishing.
  37. Rahardjo, S. (2017). Other Sides of the Indonesian Law. Kompas.
  38. Scott, R. L. (2024). Contempt: The Original Judicial Cheat Code. Dickinson Law Review, 129(1).
  39. Seno Adji, O., & Seno Adji, I. (2007). Independent Judiciary and Contempt of Court:
  40. Shadiq, A. (2025). Synergy of the Judicial Commission and the Supreme Court in an effort to realize the professional supervision of judges. Golden Ratio of Law and Social Policy Review, 4(2), 105–111. https://doi.org/10.52970/grlspr.v4i2.1680
  41. Subarsyah, T. (2020). Contempt of Court in the Indonesian Criminal Justice System: International Journal of Science and Society, 2(3), 312–321. https://doi.org/10.54783/ijsoc.v2i3.177
  42. 18 U.S. Code § 401 – Power of Court (1948).
  43. US Supreme Court. (1941). Report on Bridges v. California.
  44. Wahidy, R. (2025). Implementation of Contempt of Court in the Theory of the Indonesian Criminal Law System. Al-Mashlahah: Journal of Islamic Law and Social Institutions, 107–126. https://doi.org/10.30868/am.v11i01.4095
  45. Watson, A. (1993). Legal Transplants: An Approach to Comparative Law (2nd ed.). University of Georgia Press.
  46. Watson, A. (1995). Aspects of the Reception of Law. The American Journal of Comparative Law, 44(2).