Article Sidebar

Download
Download Article

Main Article Content

Abstract

The government often implements relocation policies to convert strategic areas into various development projects, purportedly for the common good. The implications of these policies often create tensions due to the dichotomy between the sovereignty of community living space over land and the state's authority to regulate land use. This study analyzes the alignment between the implementation of relocation policies and community empowerment efforts with the constitutional mandate outlined in the 1945 Constitution of the Republic of Indonesia. This study uses normative legal research methods with a conceptual and legislative approach to produce a prescriptive analysis. Based on this analysis, the study formulates policy principles that the government should consider. Furthermore, this study analyzes the legal relationships among land, buildings, and historical ownership, and their implications for relocation and empowerment policies.

Keywords

Customary Relocation Rights Historical Community Empowerment

Article Details

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

How to Cite
Rosando, A. F. (2025). Relocation and Community Empowerment from the Perspective of the 1945 Constitution of the Republic of Indonesia. Golden Ratio of Law and Social Policy Review, 4(2), 207–213. https://doi.org/10.52970/grlspr.v4i2.2098
Download Citation
Endnote/Zotero/Mendeley (RIS)
BibTeX

References

  1. Dahlan, M. (2019). "Recognition of the Rights of Indigenous Peoples in the Constitution." Undang: Jurnal Hukum 1 (2): 187–217. https://doi.org/10.22437/ujh.1.2.187-217.
  2. David Tan.. 2021. "Legal Research Methods: Analyzing and Reviewing Methodologies in Conducting Legal Research." NUSANTARA: Journal of Social Sciences 8 (5): 1332–36.
  3. Earlene, Felishella, and Tundjung Herning Sitabuana. 2024. "State Responsibility Towards the Rights of Indigenous Communities on Rempang Island from a Human Rights Perspective." Tunas Agraria 7 (2): 144–61. https://doi.org/10.31292/jta.v7i2.301.
  4. Government Regulation Number 19 of 2021 concerning the Implementation of Land Acquisition for Development in the Public Interest
  5. Isra, S. (2016). "The Role of the Constitutional Court in Strengthening Human Rights in Indonesia." Constitutional Journal 11 (3): 409. https://doi.org/10.31078/jk1131.
  6. Kristiani, V. (2020). "Just Law for the Customary Rights of Customary Law Communities (Study and Implementation)." ADIL: Journal of Law 11 (1). https://doi.org/10.33476/ajl.v11i1.1449.
  7. Lathif, N. (2017). "Legal Theory as a Tool to Renew or Engineer Society." Palar | Pakuan Law Review 3 (1): 73–94. https://doi.org/10.33751/palar.v3i1.402.
  8. Law of the Republic of Indonesia Number 2 of 2012 concerning Land Acquisition for Development in the Public Interest
  9. Law of the Republic of Indonesia Number 5 of 1960 concerning Basic Agrarian Regulations
  10. Liam, Tanto. (2014). "Constitutional Interpretation: Testing the Constitutionality of Laws Against the 1945 Constitution." Journal of Legal Media 21 (1): 89–106. https://journal.umy.ac.id/index.php/jmh/article/view/1159.
  11. Nugroho, B. Eko. (2022). "Protection of Indigenous Peoples' Rights in the Relocation of the National Capital." JISIP UNJA (Journal of Social and Political Sciences, University of Jambi) 6 (1): 83–97. https://doi.org/10.22437/jisipunja.v6i1.17417.
  12. Saly, J. N., Ermita Ekalia, & Tarumanagara University. (2023). "Legal Protection Status for Local Communities Regarding the Relocation of Rempang Island." Citizenship Journal 7 (2): 1668–76. https://journal.upy.ac.id/index.php/pkn/article/view/5408.
  13. The 1945 Constitution of the Republic of Indonesia
  14. Widiarty, W. S. (2024). Buku Ajar Metodologi Penelitian Hukum. Yogyakarta: Publika Global Media.
  15. Wulansari, C. Dewi. (2014). "Customary Law in Indonesia." Refika Aditama , 1–14.