Article Sidebar

Download
Download Article

Main Article Content

Abstract

This research aims to: (1) identify and analyze the legal provisions regarding the validity of electronic signatures within the Indonesian civil law system; and (2) examine and analyze the legal framework governing the verification of electronic signatures as evidence in civil cases according to the prevailing laws and regulations in Indonesia. This study employs a normative juridical research method, using primary data derived from statutory regulations and legal literature. The data were analyzed qualitatively and descriptively by examining the conformity of legal implementation with the principles of evidence in civil procedural law. The research findings indicate that: (1) electronic signatures have legitimate and legally recognized status as long as they meet the requirements stipulated in Article 11 of Law Number 11 of 2008 on Electronic Information and Transactions; and (2) the verification of the validity of electronic signatures follows the general procedures of evidence examination. The study recommends that: (1) there should be increased legal awareness regarding the validity and security of electronic signatures in digital transactions. Intensive public dissemination can help the community understand that legally valid electronic signatures possess the same legal force as conventional signatures, thereby enhancing efficiency and trust in technology-based economic activities; and (2) it is important to strengthen digital legal literacy and capacity through continuous training on electronic evidence and cybersecurity. With a comprehensive understanding, law enforcement officials can assess the validity of electronic signatures objectively and consistently in accordance with the principles of justice and legal certainty.

Keywords

Electronic Signature Law No. 11 of 2008 on Electronic Information and Transactions Validity Verification

Article Details

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

How to Cite
Malkab, A. K., Husen, L. O., & Asriati, A. (2025). Legal Analysis of Electronic Signatures Under Indonesia’s Law No. 11 of 2008 on Electronic Information and Transactions. Golden Ratio of Law and Social Policy Review, 4(2), 169–181. https://doi.org/10.52970/grlspr.v4i2.1879
Download Citation
Endnote/Zotero/Mendeley (RIS)
BibTeX

References

  1. Achmad, A. (2012). Asas-asas hukum pembuktian perdata. Jakarta: Kencana Prenada Media.
  2. Ahmad, S., Hasan, A., & Umar, M. (2023). Kepatuhan terhadap hukum (sebuah perspektif filsafat hukum). Indonesian Journal of Islamic Jurisprudence, Economic and Legal Theory, 1(4), 930–944.
  3. Amelia Intan Saraswati, A., et al. (2023). Keberlakuan tanda tangan elektronik pada dokumen negara. UNES Review, 6(1). https://doi.org/10.31933/unesrev.v6i1
  4. Devi Chintya Dewi, D., et al. (2024). Electronic signatures as a legal solution for contracts in Indonesia’s digital era. LETTERLIJK: Jurnal Hukum Perdata. https://doi.org/10.25134/jise.v1i2.xx
  5. E., & Isworo, A. S. (2022). Evidence instruments in judicial process: Ensuring justice and legal certainty (pp. 210–225).
  6. Eka Wahyuni, E., Rahman, S., & Risma, A. (2022). Validity of digital signatures in civil law and the ITE Law. Journal of Lex Generalis (JLS), 3(5).
  7. Ellya Rosana. (n.d.). Legal compliance is a manifestation of legal awareness in society.
  8. Faulina, J., Barkatullah, A. H., & Gozali, D. S. (2022). Article 16, paragraph (1) letter f, article 54. Prosiding Universitas PGRI Madiun, 1(2).
  9. Fauzi, I., Rifai, A., & Shebubakar, A. N. (2024). Potensi masalah hukum dalam tanda tangan elektronik dalam pembuktian hukum acara perdata Indonesia. Jurnal Bedah Hukum, 8(1), 124–144. https://doi.org/10.36596/jbh.v8i1.1047
  10. Fauzi, I., Rifai, A., & Shebubakar, A. N. (2024). Potential legal issues in electronic signatures under Indonesia’s civil procedure law. Jurnal Bedah Hukum, 8(1), 124–144. https://doi.org/10.36596/jbh.v8i1.1047
  11. Fitcanisa, J. D., & Azheri, B. (2023). Keabsahan tanda tangan elektronik pada akta notaris. Sibatik Journal, 2(5), 1449–1458. https://doi.org/10.54443/sibatik.v2i5.809
  12. Fitriani Irianti, F., Rahman, S., & Sahban. (2024). The legal evidentiary power of digital signatures in government contracts. Journal of Lex Philosophy (JLP), 5(2).
  13. Friedman, L. M. (1975). The legal system: A social science perspective. New York: Russell Sage Foundation.
  14. Haklainul Dunggio. (2025). Interview: Judge of Makassar District Court.
  15. Hasan, L. K., Rizqy, M., & Putra, S. (2025). Electronic contracts and e-signatures in Indonesia: Legal framework and challenges in the digital revolution. Helium Journal of Health, Education, Law, Information, and Humanities, 2(1), 178–185.
  16. Hudzaifah, H. (n.d.). Keabsahan tanda tangan elektronik dalam pembuktian hukum acara perdata Indonesia.
  17. Ibrahim, J. (2021). Teori dan metodologi penelitian hukum normatif. Malang: Bayu Media.
  18. Ilham, D. H., et al. (2022). Keabsahan tanda tangan elektronik pada perjanjian jual beli barang dari perspektif hukum perdata. Journal Petitum, 10(2), 161–173. https://uit.e-journal.id/JPetitum
  19. Indonesia. (2008). Law No. 11 of 2008 on Electronic Information and Transactions.
  20. Indonesia. (2016). Law No. 19 of 2016 (Amendment to the ITE Law).
  21. Indonesia. (2019). Government Regulation No. 71 of 2019 on the Implementation of Electronic Systems and Transactions.
  22. Indonesia. (2024). Law No. 1 of 2024 (Second Amendment to the ITE Law).
  23. Lapian, R. (2024). Regulation of electronic signatures under Law No. 19 of 2016 on information and electronic transactions. Lex Privatum, 13(1), 45–60.
  24. Law No. 1 of 2020 on Stamp Duty.
  25. Law No. 11 of 2008 on Electronic Information and Transactions (as amended by Law No. 19 of 2016).
  26. Law No. 1 of 2024 on the Amendment to the Electronic Information and Transactions Law.
  27. Marzuki, M. (2017). Penelitian hukum (Rev. ed., Vol. 13). Jakarta: Kencana.
  28. Maryam Hanum, S. (n.d.). Penggunaan teknologi dengan sarana video konferensi dalam pembuatan akta. Program Studi Magister Kenotariatan, Universitas Sumatera Utara.
  29. Ministerial Regulation No. 11 of 2022.
  30. Ni Putu Riyani Kartika Sari, N. P. R. K., & Ni Luh Putu Geney Sri Kusuma Dewi, N. L. P. G. S. K. D. (2020). The existence of Positief Wettelijk Bewijstheorie in civil evidence. Journal Akses, 12.
  31. Nonet, P., & Selznick, P. (2019). Responsive law (Indonesian translation).
  32. Pangaribuan, L. J., et al. (2023). Document authentication strategies using digital signatures with the Schnorr algorithm. KLIK: Kajian Ilmiah Informatika dan Komputer, 3(4), 384–392.
  33. Putri, W. S., & Budiana, N. (2018). Keabsahan kontrak elektronik dalam transaksi e-commerce ditinjau dari hukum perikatan. Jurnal Akuntansi dan Hukum, 1(2), 2620–3715.
  34. Qamar, N., Syarif, M., Busthami, D. S., Hidjaz, M. K., Aswari, A., Djanggih, H., & Rezah, F. S. (2017). Metode penelitian hukum (Legal research methods). Makassar: CV Social Politic Genius (SIGn).
  35. Rahardjo, S. (2021). Hukum dan masyarakat digital: Pendekatan normatif terhadap transaksi elektronik. Jakarta: Kompas.
  36. Salle. (2020). Metode penelitian hukum. Makassar: CV Nas Media Pustaka.
  37. Setiawan, P. J., Nugraha, X., & Srihandayani, L. (2022). Konsep penegakan hukum yang sistematis dalam perselisihan pra-yudisial di Indonesia. Jurnal Hukum Ius Quia Iustum, 29(1), 68–92.
  38. Slamet, T. S., & Paliling, M. M. (n.d.). Kekuatan hukum transaksi dan tanda tangan elektronik dalam perjanjian.
  39. Soekanto, S. (2005). Faktor-faktor yang mempengaruhi penegakan hukum. Jakarta: Rajawali Pers.
  40. Soekanto, S. (2007). Penelitian hukum normatif: Suatu tinjauan singkat. Jakarta: RajaGrafindo Persada.
  41. Soekanto, S., & Mamudji. (2019). Penelitian hukum normatif: Suatu tinjauan singkat. Jakarta: Rajawali Pers.
  42. Supreme Court Regulation No. 1 of 2016 on Mediation Procedure.
  43. Supreme Court Regulation No. 1 of 2019 on Electronic Case Administration and e-Litigation (as amended by PERMA No. 7 of 2022).
  44. Tan Thong Kie. (2007). Studi notariat: Beberapa mata pelajaran dan serba-serbi praktek notaris (Vol. 1).
  45. Tanti Kirana Utami, T. K., et al. (2024). Pengaruh teori perundang-undangan terhadap dinamika norma hukum dalam sistem hukum Indonesia. Jurnal Hukum Ius Publicum, 5(2), 265–293.
  46. Usman, T. (2020). Keabsahan tanda tangan elektronik pada perjanjian jual beli barang dari perspektif hukum perdata. Indonesia Private Law Review, 1(2), 87–98. https://doi.org/10.25041/iplr.v1i2.2058
  47. Utama, A. S. (2019). Public trust toward law enforcement in Indonesia (pp. 306–313).
  48. Wiraguna, S. A. (2024). Normative and empirical methods in legal research: An exploratory study in Indonesia. Public Sphere: Jurnal Sosial Politik, Pemerintahan dan Hukum, 3(3).