Article Sidebar

Download
Download Article

Main Article Content

Abstract

The problem of excessive regulation at the ministerial regulatory level in the presidential system arises because the Minister often exceeds his actual functions. This research aims to analyze the causes of overlapping regulations and authorities that cause legal uncertainty. The results show that excessive regulation is triggered by the unclear type and source of Ministers' authority, limits of authority in the formation of regulations, and the practice of direct delegation that is less controlled.

Keywords

Ministerial Regulation Overregulation Presidential System

Article Details

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

How to Cite
Dillah, D. F., Nur, I. T., & Hamzah, H. (2025). The Legal Problems of Ministerial Regulations in the Presidential System of Government. Golden Ratio of Law and Social Policy Review, 5(1), 200–209. https://doi.org/10.52970/grlspr.v5i1.1699
Download Citation
Endnote/Zotero/Mendeley (RIS)
BibTeX

References

  1. Ahmad Hidayat, A., & Fatah Yasin, I. (2025, January). Analyzed the problem of hyperregulation in the formation of laws and regulations in Indonesia with the formulation of a regulatory diet. Volume 7(2), 107.*
  2. Amin, R. I. (2020). Unraveling problems of laws and regulations in Indonesia. Journal of Law.
  3. Banakar, R., & Travers, M. (2013). Law and social theory (2nd ed.). Oxford: Hart Publishing.
  4. Corputty, P. (2020). Analysis of ministerial regulations: Quantity and overlap. Journal of Law.
  5. Dwi Anggono, B. (2019). Drafting laws and regulations in Indonesia: Problems and solutions. In W. Ekatjahjana, K. Hauerstein, & D. Heilmann (Eds.), Regulatory reform in Indonesia: Legal perspectives (pp. 126–127). Jakarta: Hans Seidel Foundation.
  6. Hukumonline. (2015). Delegated rulemaking: There are still errors in practice. Jakarta: Hukumonline.
  7. Maolana, M. I. (2018). Regulation simplification and implementation of regulatory reform. Working Paper, Bappenas.
  8. Muhdar, M. (2019). Doctrinal and non-doctrinal research: An applied approach in legal research (p. 52). Samarinda: Mulawarman University Press.
  9. Nur Tajali, I. (2019, July 2). Beleidsregel development model to create a people-based legislative hierarchy [Doctoral dissertation]. Surakarta.
  10. PIMA. (2024). Legal uncertainty due to regulatory overlap: A marine case study. Jakarta: PIMA.
  11. PSHK. (2019). A study of regulatory reform in Indonesia. Jakarta: Center for Law and Policy Studies (PSHK).
  12. Public Relations of the Ministry of Law and Human Rights of West Java. (2025, February 19). The Ministry of Law and Human Rights of West Java participated in the deepening of the material on the preparation of laws and regulations from the Directorate General of PP. Retrieved April 17, 2025, from https://jabar.kemenkum.go.id/berita-utama/kemenkum-jabar-ikuti-pendalaman-materi-perancang-peraturan-perundang-undangan-dari-ditjen-pp
  13. Regulatory Data. (2025, April 17). Peraturan Menteri Grafik. Retrieved from https://peraturan.go.id/permen/grafik
  14. Regulation.go.id. (2025, January 30). Database peraturan perundang-undangan Republik Indonesia. Retrieved from https://peraturan.go.id/permen
  15. Republic of Indonesia. (2011). Law Number 12 of 2011 concerning the establishment of laws and regulations (with amendments). Jakarta: BPHN.
  16. ResearchGate. (2025). Regulatory reform: Harmonization and deregulation.
  17. Secretariat of the Indonesian Cabinet. (2015). Guidelines for the formation of laws and regulations. Jakarta: Cabinet Secretariat.
  18. Soekanto, S., & Mamudji, S. (2015). Normative law research: A brief overview. Jakarta: Rajawali Press.
  19. UNSRAT. (2024). Delegation of regulatory authority to ministers: Problems and solutions. e-Journal UNSRAT.
  20. Viona, W. (2021, August). Paradigm changes in regulatory regulation in Indonesia. Volume 10(2), 167.*
  21. The Constitution of the Republic of Indonesia (1945).