Article Sidebar

Download
Download Article

Main Article Content

Abstract

The sustainability of food land is crucial not only for economic productivity but also for maintaining ecological balance, cultural identity, and rural livelihoods. This study examines the effectiveness of legal protections for rural communities in safeguarding sustainable agricultural land, with a focus on Lamongan District, East Java. Using a normative-empirical approach, the research combines statutory analysis of agrarian laws with field surveys and interviews involving 256 respondents, including farmers, village officials, and legal experts. The findings reveal a persistent gap between legal norms and actual practices. Although Law No. 41/2009 on the Protection of Sustainable Agricultural Land and Law No. 5/1960 on Basic Agrarian Principles provide a strong legal foundation, enforcement is hindered by weak institutional coordination, low legal literacy, and limited authority at the village level. These challenges often result in land conversion without transparent procedures or adequate community participation, threatening both agrarian justice and national food security. The study underscores the need for participatory legal reforms, stronger intergovernmental coordination, and capacity-building initiatives for village institutions. The implications extend beyond Lamongan, offering insights for policymakers and scholars interested in land governance, food sovereignty, and rural sustainability. Future research should explore longitudinal and comparative perspectives to strengthen the integration of law and social policy in agrarian contexts.

Keywords

Legal Protection Sustainable Food Land Rural Communities Land Conversion Agrarian Law

Article Details

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

How to Cite
Maulidah, N., Munir, A., Sholihan, Afiyah, S., & Sundari, A. (2025). Legal Protection for Rural Communities in Achieving Sustainable Food Land (A Case Study of Lamongan District, East Java). Golden Ratio of Law and Social Policy Review, 5(1), 168–180. https://doi.org/10.52970/grlspr.v5i1.1611
Download Citation
Endnote/Zotero/Mendeley (RIS)
BibTeX

References

  1. Afandi, A. (2022). Elite capture dalam kebijakan alih fungsi lahan pertanian di Jawa Timur. Pustaka Adat.
  2. Antlöv, H., Wetterberg, A., & Dharmawan, L. (2016). Village governance, community life, and the 2014 village law in Indonesia. Bulletin of Indonesian Economic Studies, 52(2), 161–183. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/00074918.2016.1189537
  3. Ardhana, I. K. (2019). Subak: Balinese local wisdom recognized by the world. Udayana University Press.
  4. Badan Pusat Statistik. (2022). Statistik lahan pertanian 2021.
  5. Bedner, A. (2016). Indonesian land law: Integration at last? And for whom? ISEAS–Yusof Ishak Institute, 5(1), 63–86.
  6. Borras, S. M., Hall, R., Scoones, I., White, B., & Wolford, W. (2016). Towards a better understanding of global land grabbing: an editorial introduction. Journal of Peasant Studies, 38(2), 209–216. https://doi.org/10.1080/03066150.2011.559005
  7. Budiardjo, M. (2019). The social function of land ownership rights. Prenada Media.
  8. FAO. (2012). Voluntary guidelines on the responsible governance of tenure of land, fisheries, and forests in the context of national food security.
  9. FAO. (2020). The state of the world’s land and water resources for food and agriculture – Systems at breaking point.
  10. Fauzi, A. (2020). Agricultural land conversion and national food security. LP3ES.
  11. Fraser, N. (2009). Scales of justice: Reimagining political space in a globalizing world. Columbia University Press.
  12. Galtung, J. (2017). Violence, peace, and peace research. Journal of Peace Research, 6(3), 167–191.
  13. Hadjon, P. M., & Mahfud, M. D. (2019). Legal protection for the Indonesian people. PT Bina Ilmu.
  14. Hidayat, R. (2020). Participatory mapping for the protection of sustainable agricultural land in Bantul. Jurnal Agraria, 12(2), 45–60.
  15. Kusuma, A. B., & Elson, R. E. (2016). A note on the sources for the 1945 constitutional debates in Indonesia. Bijdragen Tot de Taal-, Land- En Volkenkunde / Journal of the Humanities and Social Sciences of Southeast Asia, 167(2–3), 196–209. https://doi.org/10.1163/22134379-90003589
  16. McCarthy, J. F., Vel, J. A. C., & Afiff, S. (2012). Trajectories of land acquisition and enclosure: development schemes, virtual land grabs, and green acquisitions in Indonesia’s Outer Islands. Journal of Peasant Studies, 39(2), 521–549. https://doi.org/10.1080/03066150.2012.671768
  17. Merry, S. E. (1988). Legal Pluralism. Law & Society Review, 22(5), 869–896. https://doi.org/10.2307/3053638
  18. Suryana, A. (2021). The future of Indonesian agriculture: Challenges and opportunities. PT Gramedia Pustaka Utama.
  19. Tyson, A. D. (2019). Decentralization and adat revivalism in Indonesia: The politics of becoming indigenous. Routledge.
  20. Warren, C., & Lucas, A. (2013). Land for the people: The state and agrarian conflict in Indonesia. Ohio University Press.
  21. Winoto, J. (2018). Sustainable development and protection of agricultural land. Universitas Indonesia Press.
  22. Zhang, W. (2019). Land use policy and food security in China. Routledge.