Article Sidebar

Download
Download Article

Main Article Content

Abstract

Government procurement of goods and services strategically supports national development, including in regions with special characteristics such as West Papua Province. Even though the legal framework for procurement has been regulated normatively through Presidential Regulation Number 12 of 2021, implementing accountability principles in West Papua still faces various challenges. This study aims to analyze the implementation of the principle of accountability in the procurement of goods and services in West Papua from the perspective of Indonesian positive law, as well as assess the effectiveness of its application in a complex geographical and social context. The theoretical approaches used include public accountability theory, sound governance principles, and John Rawls's theory of legal justice. The study results show a gap between legal norms and practice in the field, which is characterized by weak supervision, low human resource capacity, and minimal community participation. This condition indicates the need to strengthen the legal supervision system and policy reformulation that is adaptive to regional specificities.

Keywords

Accountability Procurement of Goods and Services Positive Law West Papua Good Governance Legal Justice

Article Details

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

How to Cite
Korwa, J., Roberth KR Hammar, & Imanuel I. R. Hammar. (2025). Legal Aspects of Procurement Accountability in West Papua, Indonesia. Golden Ratio of Law and Social Policy Review, 5(1), 78–83. https://doi.org/10.52970/grlspr.v5i1.1558
Download Citation
Endnote/Zotero/Mendeley (RIS)
BibTeX

References

  1. Aliansi Masyarakat Adat Nusantara (AMAN). (2020). Panduan Tata Kelola Wilayah Adat. Jakarta: AMAN.
  2. Badan Pemeriksa Keuangan Republik Indonesia. (2022). Ikhtisar Hasil Pemeriksaan Semester I Tahun 2022 – Provinsi Papua Bar-at. Jakarta.
  3. Badan Pemeriksa Keuangan Republik Indonesia. (2023). Ikhtisar Hasil Pemeriksaan Semester II Tahun 2022 – Provinsi Papua Barat. Jakarta.
  4. Firdaus, A. (2019). Pengawasan Internal Pemerintah Daerah dan Efektivitas Anggaran. Jurnal Keuangan Daerah, 8(3), 98–112.
  5. Hamid, M. A. (2021). Analisis Yuridis Akuntabilitas Pengadaan Daerah. Jurnal Hukum & Regulasi, 10(1), 23–39.
  6. Komisi Pemberantasan Korupsi. (2023). Laporan Penanganan Kasus Pengadaan di Wilayah Timur. Jakarta.
  7. Lembaga Kebijakan Pengadaan Barang/Jasa Pemerintah (LKPP). (2022). Laporan Tahunan Pengadaan Nasional. Jakarta.
  8. Peraturan Presiden Republik Indonesia No. 12 Tahun 2021 tentang Pengadaan Barang/Jasa Pemerintah.
  9. Raharjo, S. (2020). Transparansi dan Akuntabilitas dalam Pengadaan Publik di Indonesia. Jurnal Hukum dan Etika, 15(2), 87–104.
  10. Republik Indonesia. (2021). Peraturan Presiden No. 12 Tahun 2021 tentang Pengadaan Barang dan Jasa Pemerintah. Jakarta.
  11. Romzek, B. S., & Dubnick, M. J. (1987). Accountability in the Public Sector: Lessons from the Challenger Tragedy. Public Administration Review, 47(3), 227–238.
  12. Sari, L. M., & Tumiwa, M. (2021). Implementasi e-Procurement dan Tantangannya di Daerah 3T. Jurnal Kebijakan Publik, 12(1), 55–72.
  13. Tjahjono, G. (2020). Peran APIP dalam Mendorong Akuntabilitas Pengadaan Barang dan Jasa. Jurnal Ilmu Pemerintahan, 9(2), 43–58.
  14. Undang-Undang Dasar Negara Republik Indonesia Tahun 1945, Pasal 23 ayat (1).
  15. Undang-Undang Republik Indonesia No. 17 Tahun 2003 tentang Keuangan Negara.
  16. Undang-Undang Republik Indonesia No. 30 Tahun 2014 tentang Administrasi Pemerintahan.