Judge's Legal Analysis of Murder Offices

Main Article Content

Andi Istiqlal Assaad
Mursyid Mursyid
Setyaningsih Setyaningsih

Abstract

This study aims to describe the basis for the application of criminal law to the crime of murder that occurred in Wajo Regency and to find out the judge's considerations in making a decision on case Number 156/Pid.B/2020/PN.Sengkang through legal principles and legal norms that were taken into consideration. The research method that uses this case approach shows in the results of the study that the application of material punishment for the offense of murder is in accordance with applicable legal norms, all elements of criminal acts regulated in the applicable regulations in Indonesia have been met in which the defendant was sentenced to imprisonment for 14 (fourteen) years. twelve) years. The judge's legal considerations for the murder offense in the case were in accordance with the elements proven in the trial, so that the panel of judges based on the facts at trial judged that the defendant could be held accountable for his actions with the consideration that at the time he committed his actions the defendant was aware of the consequences and did not prevent him from doing so. the intention is that the perpetrator in carrying out his actions is in good health and capable of considering elements against the law, and there is no reason for the abolition of the crime.

Article Details

How to Cite
Assaad, A. I., Mursyid, M., & Setyaningsih, S. (2021). Judge’s Legal Analysis of Murder Offices. Golden Ratio of Law and Social Policy Review, 1(1), 01 - 06. Retrieved from https://goldenratio.id/index.php/grlspr/article/view/116
Section
Articles

References

Agustini, N. K. S. K., & Purwanti, N. P. (2016). Analisis Unsur-Unsur Pasal 340 Kuhp Tentang Pembunuhan Berencanapada Kasus Pembunuhan Tragis Anggota Ormas Di Bali. Universitas Udayana, 53(9), 1689–1699.

A Aswari, S Salle (2018). Serangkai Potensi Aksi Tawuran Antar Siswa, Prosiding Seminar Nasional STKIP Andi Matappa Pangkep 1 (1), 192-199

Arief, B. N. (2018). Masalah Penegakan Hukum Dan Kebijakan Hukum Pidana Dalam Penanggulangan (Cetakan ke). Kencana. https://books.google.co.id/books?hl=id&lr=&id=AeLJDwAAQBAJ&oi=fnd&pg=PR9&dq=Masalah+Penegakan+Hukum+dan+Kebijakan+Hukum+Pidana+Dalam+Penanggulangan&ots=kNBQB6yR3i&sig=wWpRXIO88WraG7NIuulju7Vj_bY&redir_esc=y#v=onepage&q=Masalah Penegakan Hukum dan Kebijaka

Asshiddiqie, J. (2015). The Rule Of Law di Indonesia Pasca Reformasi. Jimly.Com. http://www.jimly.com/makalah/namafile/177/THE_RULE_OF_LAW.pdf

Farahwati, F. (2018). Pembuktian Memegang Peranan Penting dalam Proses Pemeriksaan Sidang Peradilan Pidana. Legalitas, 3(1), 19. https://doi.org/doi.org/10.31293/lg.v3i1.3673

Fernando, Z. J. (2001). Due Process of Law Dalam Penanggulangan Tindak Pidana Di Indonesia. 21(1), 67–89. https://journals.unihaz.ac.id/index.php/keadilan/article/view/2017/1017

Hajairin, H. (2017). Konstruksi Hukum Dalam Pembuktian Unsur Tindak Pidana Pembunuhan Berencana. SANGAJI: Jurnal Pemikiran Syariah Dan Hukum, 1(1), 59–70. https://doi.org/10.52266/sangaji.v1i1.67

Hananta, D. (2018). Pertimbangan Keadaan-Keadaan Meringankan Dan Memberatkan Dalam Penjatuhan Pidana / Aggravating and Mitigating Circumstances Consideration on Sentencing. Jurnal Hukum Dan Peradilan, 7(1), 87. https://doi.org/10.25216/jhp.7.1.2018.87-108

Hasaziduhu Moho. (2019). Penegakan Hukum Di Indonesia Menurut Aspek Kepastian Hukum, Keadilan, dan Kemanfaatan. Universitas Dharmawangsa, 13(1), 138–149. https://doi.org/doi.org/10.46576/wdw.v0i59.349

Lilik Mulyadi. (2012). Penelitian Asas, Teori, Norma dan Praktik Peradilan. Jurnal Hukum Dan Peradilan, 1(2), 311–337. https://doi.org/dx.doi.org/10.25216/jhp.1.2.2012.311-337

Marentek, J. I. (2019). Pertanggung Jawaban Pidana Pelaku Tindak Pidana Pembunuhan Berencana Ditinjau Dari Pasal 340 Kuhp. Lex Crimen, 8(11), 88–95. https://ejournal.unsrat.ac.id/index.php/lexcrimen/article/view/27953/27431

Miharja, M. (2019). Pengantar Ilmu Hukum. Qiara Media.

Nawi, S., Syarif, M., Hambali, A. R., & Salle, S. (2019). Understanding to Intergroup Conflict: Social Harmonization and Law Awareness of Society. Substantive Justice International Journal of Law, 2(2), 137. https://doi.org/10.33096/substantivejustice.v2i2.45

Pieter, S., & Silambi, E. D. (2019). Pembuktian dalam Tindak Pidana Pembunuhan Berencana Ditinjau dari Kitab Udang-Undang Hukum Pidana. Jurnal Restorative Justice, 3(1), 75–91. https://doi.org/doi.org/10.35724/jrj.v3i1.1940

Ridwan, R. (2020). Pemanfaatan Hasil Rekam Sidang Korupsi untuk Menghasilkan Putusan Berkeadilan. Kanun: Jurnal Ilmu Hukum, 22(1), 149–162. https://doi.org/doi.org/10.24815/kanun.v22i1.14621

Rochaeti, N., & Dwi Sutanti, R. (2018). Kontribusi Peradilan Adat dan Keadilan Restoratif dalam Pembaruan Hukum Pidana di Indonesia. Masalah-Masalah Hukum, 47(3), 198–214. https://doi.org/10.14710/mmh.47.3.2018.198-214

Rogahang, M. (2012). Suatu Study Tentang Akibat Hukum Dari Surat Dakwaan Kabur Dalam Perkara Pidana. Lex Crimen, 1(4), 111–123. https://ejournal.unsrat.ac.id/index.php/lexcrimen/article/view/905/720

Rusyadi, I. (2016). Kekuatan Alat Bukti Dalam Persidangan Perkara Pidana. Jurnal Hukum PRIORIS, 5(2), 128–134. https://trijurnal.lemlit.trisakti.ac.id/prioris/article/view/558

Simatupang, N., & Faisal. (2017). Kriminologi: Suatu Pengantar. In Angewandte Chemie International Edition, 6(11), 951–952. Pustaka Prima. http://repository.umsu.ac.id/handle/123456789/15406

Sodiqin, A. (2015). Restorative Justice dalam Tindak Pidana Pembunuhan: Perspektif Hukum Pidana Indonesia dan Hukum Pidana Islam. Asy-Syir’ah, 49(1), 63–100. https://doi.org/dx.doi.org/10.14421/asy-syir’ah.2015.%25x

Suardana, I. W. (2014). Hukuman Mati dalam Sistem Hukum Indonesia Suatu Kajian Kritis. 2(1), 126–138. https://ejournal.unipas.ac.id/index.php/KW/article/view/433

Waskita, Y., & Widiyanti, N. (2007). Kejahatan dalam Masyarakat dan Pencegahannya. PT. Bina Aksara.