Main Article Content

Abstract

This study examines the construction of social inequality among characters in the drama Pyramid Game using Peter Berger’s social construction theory and Charles S. Peirce’s semiotics. The research aims to analyze how visual and linguistic elements reflect social inequality between the characters. A descriptive qualitative analysis was employed, focusing on scenes depicting social inequality. The findings show that externalization is evident in actions and dialogues that demonstrate the enforcement of social rules and hierarchies. Objectivation is reflected in the shared acceptance of social inequality as a recognized reality, while internalization is observed in how the characters adapt to their roles within the social hierarchy. This study contributes to a deeper understanding of the dynamics of social inequality in the context of the drama.

Keywords

Reality Construction Social Inequality Construction Theory Semiotic

Article Details

How to Cite
Ashshiddiq, A. D., Muharam, F., Windratno, H., & Pratama, M. A. A. . (2024). The Construction of Social Inequality Reality Among Characters in the Drama Pyramid Game. Golden Ratio of Data in Summary, 4(2), 987–994. https://doi.org/10.52970/grdis.v4i2.762

References

  1. Abdussamad, H. Z., & Si Sik, M. (2021). Metode penelitian kualitatif. CV. Syakir Media Press.
  2. Arfan, A., & Arfan, I. A. (2021). A strategy for strengthening public perception toward sharia banking. Banks and Bank Systems, 16(2), 170–181.
  3. Berger, P. L. (1990). Tafsir sosial atas kenyataan: Risalah tentang sosiologi pengetahuan. Jakarta: LP3ES.
  4. Berger, P., & Luckmann, T. (2016). The social construction of reality. In Social theory re-wired (pp. 110–122). Routledge.
  5. Dyatmika, T. (2021). Ilmu komunikasi. Jakarta: Zahir Publishing.
  6. Hadiwijaya, A. S. (2023). Sintesa teori konstruksi sosial realitas dan konstruksi sosial media massa. Dialektika Komunika: Jurnal Kajian Komunikasi dan Pembangunan Daerah, 11(1), 75–89.
  7. Irawati, D., Natsir, N. F., & Haryanti, E. (2021). Positivisme, pospositivisme, teori kritis, dan konstruktivisme dalam perspektif ‘epistemologi Islam.’ JIIP-Jurnal Ilmiah Ilmu Pendidikan, 4(8), 870–880.
  8. Jones, P. I. P., Bradbury, L. I. Z., Le Boutillier, D. A. N. S., & Saifuddin, A. F. (2016). Pengantar teori-teori sosial. Jakarta: Yayasan Pustaka Obor Indonesia.
  9. Nuziar, A. (2021). Representasi kelas sosial dalam film Crazy Rich Asian (analisis semiotika Charles Sanders Pierce). Universitas Islam Indonesia.
  10. Pratiwi, M., Nurjuman, H., & Yusanto, Y. (2021). Konstruksi maskulinitas perempuan melawan tindak kekerasan pada film thriller (analisis semiotika pada film Marlina si pembunuh dalam empat babak). Jurnal Ilmu Komunikasi, 8(2), 138–149.
  11. Sahid, N. (2016). Semiotika untuk teater, tari, wayang purwa dan film.
  12. Sobur. (2013). Semiotika komunikasi. Jakarta: Kencana.
  13. Syafrina, A. E. (2022). Komunikasi massa (R. Kusumawati, Ed.). Sumedang: Mega Press Nusantara.
  14. Tania, N. R., Sakinah, R. M. N., & Rusmana, D. (2022). Analisis semiotika Charles Sanders Pierce pada karikatur cover Majalah Tempo edisi 16-22 September 2019. Jurnal Humaya: Jurnal Hukum, Humaniora, Masyarakat, dan Budaya, 2(2), 139–149.
  15. Wibowo, I. S. W. (2013). Semiotika komunikasi: Aplikasi praktis bagi penelitian dan skripsi komunikasi. Jakarta: Mitra Wacana Media.

Similar Articles

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 > >> 

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.