Article Sidebar

Download
Download Article

Main Article Content

Abstract

The rapid development of artificial intelligence (AI) presents both opportunities and ethical challenges for character education. Issues such as AI-assisted plagiarism, misinformation, privacy violations, online gambling, and moral degradation indicate that digital literacy requires an ethical foundation rooted in Islamic values. This study reconstructs Sunan Ampel’s Moh Limo philosophy as an Islamic digital ethics framework for strengthening character education in the age of AI. It employs library research and a conceptual approach. Data were drawn from scholarly literature on Moh Limo, digital ethics, character education, digital literacy, and AI and analyzed through thematic analysis and conceptual synthesis. The findings demonstrate that the five Moh Limo values—moh main, moh maling, moh madon, moh ngombe, and moh madat—remain relevant as a foundation for digital ethics. These values are reconstructed as principles of self-control, honesty, responsibility, preservation of dignity, critical thinking through tabayun, and prudent use of technology. This study contributes a locally grounded Islamic digital ethics framework that strengthens character education and may provide a conceptual basis for policy development, teaching and learning, and future research in the age of AI.

Keywords

Moh Limo Sunan Ampel Islamic Digital Ethics Character Education Artificial Intelligence

Article Details

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

How to Cite
Azizi, M. S., & Hamid, A. R. T. (2026). Reconstructing Sunan Ampel’s “Moh Limo” Philosophy as an Islamic Digital Ethics Framework for Character Education in the Era of Artificial Intelligence. Golden Ratio of Data in Summary, 6(4), 453–462. https://doi.org/10.52970/grdis.v6i4.2519
Download Citation
Endnote/Zotero/Mendeley (RIS)
BibTeX

References

  1. Ahmad bin Hanbal. (2001). Al-Musnad. Beirut: Mu'assasah al-Risalah.
  2. Al-Tirmidzi, M. I. (1998). Al-Jami' al-Kabir (Sunan al-Tirmidzi). Riyadh: Maktabah al-Ma'arif.
  3. APJII. (2024). Survei penetrasi internet Indonesia 2024. Asosiasi Penyelenggara Jasa Internet Indonesia.
  4. Azra, A. (2019). Islam Nusantara: Jaringan global dan lokal. Prenadamedia Group.
  5. Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3(2), 77–101. https://doi.org/10.1191/1478088706qp063oa
  6. Chan, C. K. Y. (2023). A comprehensive AI policy education framework for university teaching and learning. International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education, 20(1). https://doi.org/10.1186/s41239-023-00408-3
  7. Choi, M. (2016). A concept analysis of digital citizenship for democratic citizenship education in the Internet age. Theory & Research in Social Education, 44(4), 565–607. https://doi.org/10.1080/00933104.2016.1210549
  8. Creswell, J. W., & Creswell, J. D. (2018). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches (5th ed.). SAGE Publications.
  9. Hadi, I. P. (2010). Tantangan etika dan regulasi media digital. Jurnal Komunikasi, 2(1), 75–81.
  10. Halim, A., & Prihananto. (2021). Mazhab dakwah wasathiyah Sunan Ampel. Pustaka IIMaN.
  11. Holmes, W., & Tuomi, I. (2022). State of the art and practice in AI in education. European Journal of Education, 57(4), 542–570. https://doi.org/10.1111/ejed.12533
  12. Jaakkola, E. (2020). Designing conceptual articles: Four approaches. AMS Review, 10(1–2), 18–26. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13162-020-00161-0
  13. Kementerian Agama Republik Indonesia. (2019). Al-Qur'an dan Terjemahannya: Edisi Penyempurnaan 2019. Jakarta: Lajnah Pentashihan Mushaf Al-Qur'an.
  14. Khoirunnisa, Y. (2024). Implementasi strategi dakwah Raden Rahmat dalam penyebaran Islam di Ampel Denta pada tahun 1443–1467 M (Skripsi, Universitas Lampung).
  15. Lickona, T. (1991). Educating for character: How our schools can teach respect and responsibility. Bantam Books.
  16. Mossberger, K., Tolbert, C. J., & McNeal, R. S. (2008). Digital citizenship: The Internet, society, and participation. MIT Press.
  17. Muslim ibn al-Hajjaj. (2006). Sahih Muslim. Riyadh: Dar Taibah.
  18. Muslimah, M., & Maskhuroh, L. (2019). Kontribusi Sunan Ampel (Raden Rahmat) dalam pendidikan Islam. Dar El-Ilmi: Jurnal Studi Keagamaan, Pendidikan dan Humaniora, 6(1), 128–146.
  19. Nasrullah, R. (2015). Media sosial: Perspektif komunikasi, budaya, dan sosioteknologi. Simbiosa Rekatama Media.
  20. Perkins, M., Furze, L., Roe, J., & MacVaugh, J. (2023). The AI Assessment Scale (AIAS): A framework for ethical integration of generative AI in educational assessment. Journal of University Teaching & Learning Practice. https://doi.org/10.53761/1.20.5.02
  21. Porayska-Pomsta, K., Holmes, W., & Nemorin, S. (2023). The ethics of AI in education. In B. du Boulay, A. Mitrovic, & K. Yacef (Eds.), Handbook of Artificial Intelligence in Education (pp. 571–604). Edward Elgar Publishing. https://doi.org/10.4337/9781800375413.00038
  22. Rejeki, S., Suci, A. W., Ramadhan, R., Amanullah, I., Adisetiawan, I., & Andesa, L. A. A. (2025). Kewarganegaraan digital: Tantangan etika di dunia maya. Education, Social Sciences, and Linguistics: Conference Series, 1(2), 63–70.
  23. Ribble, M. (2012). Digital citizenship in schools (3rd ed.). International Society for Technology in Education.
  24. UNESCO. (2023). Guidance for generative AI in education and research.
  25. UNESCO. (2024). AI competency framework for students.
  26. Wardle, C., & Derakhshan, H. (2017). Information disorder: Toward an interdisciplinary framework for research and policy making. Council of Europe.
  27. Zed, M. (2018). Metode penelitian kepustakaan (3rd ed.). Yayasan Obor Indonesia.

Similar Articles

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 > >> 

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.