Article Sidebar

Download
Download Article

Main Article Content

Abstract

This study examines the impact of Interactive Flat Panel Displays (IFPDs) on students’ engagement and learning motivation in elementary education at SDN 1 Sempu. Student engagement and motivation are important aspects of the learning process, particularly at the elementary school level, where meaningful and interactive learning experiences can support students’ active participation and deeper understanding. The integration of interactive technology such as IFPDs plays a strategic role in creating engaging and student-centered learning environments by combining multimedia content, touchscreen interaction, and collaborative activities. The objective of this study was to explore how the use of IFPDs influences students’ behavioral and cognitive engagement as well as their learning motivation in classroom settings. This study employed a qualitative case study approach using classroom observations, semi-structured interviews, and documentation to collect data. The participants included elementary school teachers and students at SDN 1 Sempu who had experience using IFPDs in classroom instruction. The findings revealed that the use of IFPDs enhanced students’ learning experiences through three main aspects: increased behavioral engagement during interactive activities, improved cognitive engagement through visual and interactive learning materials, and strengthened learning motivation characterized by enthusiasm and active participation. Students were more involved in touchscreen-based activities, group discussions, and interactive quizzes, which helped them focus on learning tasks and understand the material more effectively. However, the findings also indicated that the effectiveness of IFPDs depended on teacher facilitation and pedagogical integration. Teachers who designed interactive and student-centered activities were able to maximize the benefits of IFPDs, while limited technical skills and preparation time sometimes became challenges in implementation. Overall, the study concludes that the integration of IFPDs can significantly enhance student engagement and learning motivation when supported by effective teaching strategies and adequate teacher preparation. The findings contribute to the understanding of technology integration in elementary education and provide practical insights for teachers and schools in optimizing the use of interactive digital technologies in classroom learning.

Keywords

Interactive Flat Panel Display Student Engagement Learning Motivation Elementary Education Educational Technology

Article Details

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

How to Cite
Hartanto, P., & Wahyuningsih, D. (2026). The Impact of Interactive Flat Panel Displays (IFPD) on Student Engagement and Learning Motivation. Golden Ratio of Data in Summary, 6(2), 79–88. https://doi.org/10.52970/grdis.v6i2.2131
Download Citation
Endnote/Zotero/Mendeley (RIS)
BibTeX

References

  1. Ainurrohmah, F., Wulandari, R., & Prasetyo, A. (2026). The implementation of smartboard technology to improve students’ motivation in elementary school. Jurnal Inovasi Pendidikan Dasar, 10(1), 45–56.
  2. Appleton, J. J., Christenson, S. L., & Furlong, M. J. (2008). Student engagement with school: Critical conceptual and methodological issues. Review of Educational Research, 78(4), 575–609.
  3. Chai, C. S., Koh, J. H. L., & Tsai, C. C. (2019). Digital technology and student motivation: A review. Journal of Educational Technology & Society, 22(1), 49–64.
  4. Deci, E. L., & Ryan, R. M. (2000). The “what” and “why” of goal pursuits: Human needs and the self-determination of behavior. Psychological Inquiry, 11(4), 227–268.
  5. Ertmer, P. A., Ottenbreit-Leftwich, A. T., & Tondeur, J. (2019). Teacher beliefs and technology integration practices. Computers & Education, 128, 423–436.
  6. Fisser, P., & Phillips, M. (2017). Interactive displays in classrooms: A review of research. Journal of Interactive Learning Research, 28(2), 125–146.
  7. Fitriyah, L., & Mutammiroh, M. (2024). The effect of interactive learning media on student motivation in elementary education. Irsyaduna: Jurnal Studi Kemahasiswaan, 4(2), 112–120.
  8. Fredricks, J. A., Blumenfeld, P. C., & Paris, A. H. (2004). School engagement: Potential of the concept, state of the evidence. Review of Educational Research, 74(1), 59–109.
  9. Hattie, J. (2017). Visible learning and the science of how we learn. Routledge.
  10. Hidayat, T., & Musnandar, A. (2025). Pemanfaatan media pembelajaran digital dalam meningkatkan partisipasi siswa pada pembelajaran PAI. Jurnal Pendidikan Islam Dasar, 7(1), 23–35.
  11. Higgins, S., Beauchamp, G., & Miller, D. (2017). Reviewing the literature on interactive technologies and learning. Learning, Media and Technology, 42(2), 137–153.
  12. Hsieh, P. (2021). Interactive displays and student cognitive engagement. Computers in the Schools, 38(3), 182–200.
  13. Hsu, Y.-C., & Ching, Y.-H. (2015). Mobile web 2.0 learning practices in higher education. Educational Technology & Society, 18(3), 52–65.
  14. IndraSari, D., & Inganah, S. (2025). Manajemen pemanfaatan interactive flat panel dalam pembelajaran di sekolah dasar. Pendas: Jurnal Ilmiah Pendidikan Dasar, 10(2), 155–168.
  15. Indriansyah, R. (2025). Pengaruh penggunaan interactive flat panel terhadap keterlibatan siswa sekolah dasar. Jurnal Pendidikan IPS, 15(1), 67–78.
  16. Jandri, M., Saputra, H., & Lestari, D. (2025). Interactive digital media and student learning motivation in elementary classrooms. International Journal of Educational Technology in Elementary Education, 3(1), 1–10.
  17. Johnson, L., Adams Becker, S., Estrada, V., & Freeman, A. (2017). Technology outlook for K–12 education. Educational Technology Research Reports.
  18. Julaeha, S., Kurniawan, D., & Rahmawati, L. (2025). Pengaruh media pembelajaran interaktif terhadap keterlibatan belajar siswa sekolah dasar. Jurnal Inovasi Pendidikan, 9(1), 34–44.
  19. Kemendikbud. (2018). Digital literacy in Indonesian schools. Journal of Indonesian Education Policy.
  20. Li, K., & Ma, Q. (2019). Classroom technology disruptions and student learning. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 57(4), 937–958.
  21. Liu, T.-C., Lin, Y.-C., & Paas, F. (2019). Multimedia learning and interaction. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 35(6), 726–738.
  22. Luckin, R., Holmes, W., Griffiths, M., & Forcier, L. B. (2018). AI and learning design. British Journal of Educational Technology, 49(5), 887–903.
  23. Nguyen, T., Hsieh, P., & Allen, G. (2021). Technology and motivation in primary education. Educational Technology Research and Development, 69(4), 1923–1940.
  24. Nugraha, A., Setiawan, B., & Pramudita, R. (2023). Interactive learning and student engagement in primary education. Jurnal Pendidikan Dasar Nusantara, 8(2), 101–110.
  25. Nugrahani, P., Sari, D., & Utami, N. (2025). Implementasi interactive flat panel pada pembelajaran IPAS di sekolah dasar. Jurnal Kajian Pendidikan, 12(1), 88–99.
  26. Nurfadila, M. Y. (2026). Influence of Problem-Based Learning with Mind Mapping on Elementary Students' Critical Thinking. SCHOLE: Studies of Social and Holistic Education, 1(1), 20-25.
  27. Nurfadila, M. Y., Hajar, S., & Arsyad, N. F. (2024). Utilizing quizizz for game-based learning in elementary science education. Journal of Education and Computer Applications, 1(1), 12-19.
  28. Nurfadila, M. Y., Nurlina, N., & Ma’ruf, M. R. (2023). Analysis of Critical Thinking Skills of Elementary School Students Through Integrated Problem-Based Learning Model with Mind Mapping. EDUKASIA Jurnal Pendidikan dan Pembelajaran, 4(2), 1373-1380.
  29. Nurfadila, M. Y., Suarlin, S., & Elpisah, E. (2026). Unplugged Coding in Elementary Education: A Systematic Review of Its Impact on Cognitive, Social, and Motivational Skills. Elementary Education: Journal of Studies, Analysis, and Development, 1(1), 28-42.
  30. Nurhayati, A. (2022). Interactive displays in Indonesian classrooms. Indonesian Journal of Educational Technology, 5(1), 45–57.
  31. Ong, J. C., & Lai, C. (2016). Technology-enhanced primary learning in Singapore. Asian Journal of Education, 8(2), 122–134.
  32. Özdemir, M., & Özdemir, S. (2020). Visual learning and technology. Journal of Educational Multimedia and Hypermedia, 29(1), 3–21.
  33. Pamungkas, A., Suryadi, D., & Nugroho, A. (2020). Teacher digital competence and learning outcomes. Journal of Indonesian Education, 4(3), 201–217.
  34. Pamungkas, A., Suryadi, D., & Nugroho, A. (2021). Teacher digital competence in Indonesia. Journal of Indonesian Education, 5(2), 150–166.
  35. Pd, E. M., & Nurfadila, M. Y. (2026). Addressing Educational Inequality in Indonesia: Policy Challenges and Digital Solutions for Disadvantaged Regions. Edelweiss: Journal Of Innovation In Educational Research, 3(3).
  36. Pérez-Sanagustín, M., Hilliger, I., & Maldonado, J. J. (2019). Interactive displays and collaboration. Education and Information Technologies, 24(1), 39–60.
  37. Rafi, A., Nurhadi, D., & Prasetyo, B. (2022). IFPDs and student participation in primary classrooms. Journal of Interactive Learning Research, 33(1), 45–67.
  38. Rahayu, S., & Makmur, A. (2024). Smartboard technology integration in elementary education classrooms. Jurnal Inovasi Teknologi Pendidikan, 11(2), 145–156.
  39. Ryan, R. M., & Deci, E. L. (2017). Self-determination theory: Basic psychological needs in motivation, development, and wellness. Guilford Press.
  40. Ryan, R. M., & Deci, E. L. (2020). Intrinsic motivation and self-determination in education. Journal of Educational Psychology, 112(4), 679–695.
  41. Salsyabila, N., & Zulherman, Z. (2024). Pengaruh media pembelajaran interaktif terhadap pemahaman konsep siswa sekolah dasar. Jurnal Pendidikan Sains Indonesia, 12(1), 77–86.
  42. Setianingsih, E., & Idris, A. (2022). Technology integration in Indonesian elementary schools. Indonesian Journal of Educational Research, 7(1), 90–110.
  43. Sharma, R., & Sharma, R. (2023). Learning motivation with classroom technology. International Journal of Educational Research, 114, 102091.
  44. Smith, K., Jones, P., & Clark, R. (2018). Interactive whiteboards and student engagement. Computers & Education, 124, 25–37.
  45. Suarlin, S., Nurfadila, M. Y., & Arsyad, M. N. F. (2025). Analisis Program Pengembangan Kompetensi Guru dalam Penerapan Kurikulum Merdeka. EDUKATIF: Jurnal Penelitian dan Pembelajaran, 1(03), 85-94.
  46. Suryandari, K., Prasetyo, E., & Wibowo, A. (2025). Penggunaan interactive flat panel dalam meningkatkan aktivitas belajar siswa sekolah dasar. Jurnal Kajian Ilmu Pendidikan, 14(2), 120–132.
  47. Tondeur, J., Scherer, R., Siddiq, F., & Baran, E. (2017). Preparing teachers for ICT integration. Education and Information Technologies, 22, 1345–1364.
  48. Yilmaz, R. M. (2016). Educational technology and student engagement. Computers in Human Behavior, 55, 1241–1247.
  49. Yilmaz, R. M., & Yilmaz, Y. (2021). Interactive learning environments in primary education. International Journal of Early Childhood Education, 27(2), 205–225.
  50. Yin, R. K. (2018). Case study research and applications: Design and methods (6th ed.). Sage Publications.

Similar Articles

<< < 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 > >> 

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.