Article Sidebar

Download
Download Article

Main Article Content

Abstract

Regional economic disparities between Lombok Island and Sumbawa Island remain a major development challenge in West Nusa Tenggara Province (NTB), particularly in terms of uneven sectoral growth and regional economic concentration. This study analyzes the economic structure and identifies leading sectors in NTB during the 2020–2024 period using the Klassen Typology and Location Quotient (LQ) methods. The analysis employs secondary data on Gross Regional Domestic Product (GRDP) at constant 2010 prices published by the Central Statistics Agency, supported by relevant literature. Economic sectors are classified based on their growth rates and contributions to GRDP to distinguish advanced and fast-growing sectors, potential sectors, and relatively underdeveloped sectors. The findings indicate that regions on Lombok Island—especially Mataram City and West Lombok Regency—are dominated by advanced and fast-growing sectors, primarily modern services such as trade, transportation, accommodation and food services, finance, education, and health. In contrast, Sumbawa Island is characterized by a concentration in agriculture, fisheries, mining, and basic services, which largely fall into the potential or relatively underdeveloped categories.  LQ analysis further confirms that Lombok Island’s economic base is driven by trade, tourism, real estate, and educational services, while Sumbawa Island relies more heavily on agriculture, construction, and mining sectors. These findings demonstrate persistent regional economic disparities in NTB and highlight the need for region-specific development policies. The future development strategy is directed at strengthening the base sector in each region, diversifying the economy, and strengthening connectivity between regions to create inclusive and equitable growth.

Keywords

Economic Disparity Lombok Island Sumbawa Island Klassen Typology Location Quotient (LQ) Approach

Article Details

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

How to Cite
Utami, M. S., & Emi Salma. (2026). Analysis of Economic Disparities and Leading Sectors Between Lombok and Sumbawa Islands, 2020–2024. Golden Ratio of Data in Summary, 6(1), 304–318. https://doi.org/10.52970/grdis.v6i1.1847
Download Citation
Endnote/Zotero/Mendeley (RIS)
BibTeX

References

  1. Ananta, R. R., & Aulia, A. (2024). BRILLIANT: Journal of Business Management and Economics Volume 4 Number 4 November 2024 Analysis of Sector Bases and Sectoral Typologies Using the Location Quotient Approach and Klassen Typology in Kebumen Regency. 4 (November).
  2. Ariviya Juliantari, R., Sutanto, H., & Suriadi, I. (2024). Analysis of Leading Sectors in the Development of East Lombok Regency Areas. Journal of Economics and Business, 10(2), 43–55. https://doi.org/10.29303/ekonobis.v10i2.186
  3. Budiono, C. M. V., Marseto, M., & Utami, A. F. (2025). Analysis of Differences in Leading Sectors in Gunung Kidul Regency and Yogyakarta City Using Location Quotient (LQ), Shift Share (SS), and Klassen Typology Methods. Formosa Journal of Multidisciplinary Research, 4(7), 3343–3354. https://doi.org/10.55927/fjmr.v4i7.356
  4. Chen, Z., & Haynes, K. E. (2017). Impact of high-speed rail on regional economic disparity in China. Journal of Transport Geography, 65 (September 2016), 80–91. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jtrangeo.2017.08.003
  5. Darius, D., Jamal, A., & Syathi, P. B. (2021). Typological Analysis and Development of District Area Based on Potential Sectors in Pasaman Regency, West Sumatra Province, Indonesia. International Journal of Business, Economics, and Social Development, 2(4), 153–161. https://doi.org/10.46336/ijbesd.v2i4.163
  6. Fracasso, A., & Vittucci Marzetti, G. (2018). Estimating dynamic localization economies: the inadvertent success of the specialization index and the location quotient. Regional Studies, 52(1), 119–132. https://doi.org/10.1080/00343404.2017.1281388
  7. Hatta, D. (2023). Economic Growth Rates Based on the Agriculture Sector Comparative Analysis. Gorontalo Development Review, 6(1), 13. https://doi.org/10.32662/golder.v0i0.2527
  8. Hidayadi, T., & Niam, A. M. (2022). Analysis of Economic Disparity in the Greater Jakarta Region during the Covid 19 Pandemic. ILTIZAM Journal of Shariah Economics Research, 6(1), 117–130. https://doi.org/10.30631/iltizam.v6i1.1301
  9. Kia, T. A., & Ichsan, I. (2023). Analysis of Leading Sectors in Increasing Economic Growth in Medan City (Location Quotient, Shift Share and Klassen Typology Approach). E-Mabis: Journal of Management and Business Economics, 24(2), 162–171. https://doi.org/10.29103/e-mabis.v24i2.1080
  10. Manrulanggi, F., & Putri, I. A. (2025). Analysis of leading sectors using location quotient, shift share and classn typology methods in West Sumbawa Regency. Journal of Economics and Business, 11(1), 1–11. https://doi.org/10.29303/ekonobis.v11i1.211
  11. Maulina, R. (2021). Alternative analysis of the regional economic potential of East Kutai Regency using the location quotient (lq), shift share, and klassen typology method. BESTARI: Bulletin of Statistics and Current Applications, 1(2), 51–59.
  12. Mo, S. W., Lee, K. B., Lee, Y. J., & Park, H. G. (2020). Analysis of import changes through shift-share, location quotient and BCG techniques: Gwangyang Port in Asia. Asian Journal of Shipping and Logistics, 36(3), 145–156. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajsl.2020.01.001
  13. Muammar. (2021). Analysis of Leading Sectors in Banda Aceh City Based on the Klassen and Shift-Share Typology Methods. Ar-Raniry State Islamic University Banda Aceh, 99. https://repository.ar-raniry.ac.id/id/eprint/19302/1/Muammar
  14. Nofa Martina Ariani, Brian Pradana, Muhammad Indra Hadi Wijaya, & Bagus Nuari Priambudi. (2021). Analysis of Typologies and Leading Sectors of Semarang Regency Using the Location Quotient (Lq), Shift Share, and Klassen Typology Approaches. Semarang Regency Research Information Media, 4(1), 37–49. https://doi.org/10.55606/sinov.v4i1.60
  15. Pebriani, M. (2022). Analysis of Economic Disparity Between Regencies in Riau Province in 2011-2020. http://repository.uir.ac.id/id/eprint/17754%0Ahttps://repository.uir.ac.id/17754/1/173410870.pdf
  16. Period, K., Finance, P., Stan, N., & Affairs, H. (2025). improve the quality of life of the community. This achievement is highly dependent on the formulation. 2, 1–23.
  17. Prabowo, D. (2023). Analysis Of The Leading Sector Of 'Student City' With Location Quotient Method And Class Typology. Journal of State Tax and Finance (PKN), 5(1), 75–82. https://doi.org/10.31092/jpkn.v5i1.2251
  18. Purnamasari, N. A., Hadijati, M., Hidayati, L., & Saputra, D. (2025). Analysis of Economic Growth and Development Inequality Among Districts/Cities in West Nusa Tenggara Province Using the Williamson Index , Klassen Typology , and Location Quotient Methods. 7(1), 93–104.
  19. Ramadhani, M. D. (2022). Analysis of the Comparison of Classn Typology and Location Quotient (LQ) Methods in Determining Leading Economic Sectors in Sidoarjo Regency Before and During the COVID-19 Pandemic. 11–32.
  20. Ray Julio Pangow, Alen Memah, D. Busdan, Rorong, I. P. F., & Mauna Th. B. Maramis. (2023). The Analysis of Economic Sector Potential in Surabaya using Location Quotient, Shift Share, and Class Typology in 2015-2019. Open Access Indonesia Journal of Social Sciences, 6(1), 898–905. https://doi.org/10.37275/oaijss.v6i1.148
  21. Ryansyah, M., Ria Armayani Hasibuan, R., Naser Daulay, A., & Islam Negeri Sumatra Utara, U. (2023). Williamson Index Approach And Class Typology In Analysis Of Regional Economic Inequalities In The Pursuit Of Sustainable Development Goals In North Sumatra Williamson Index Approach And Class Typology In Analyzing Regional Economic Inequality. Management Studies and Entrepreneurship Journal, 4(5), 1285–1295. http://journal.yrpipku.com/index.php/msej
  22. Soeharjoto, Tribudhi, D. A., Hariyanti, D., Nugroho, L., & Aziz, R. M. (2021). Portrait of Economic Potential in Badung Regency, Bali. International Journal of Economics, Business and Accounting Research (IJEBAR), 5(3), 884–892.
  23. Suprianto, S., Sutanty, M., & Zulkia, A. A. (2022). Analysis of Economic Growth and Development Inequality in West Nusa Tenggara Province. Journal of Economics & Business, 10(1), 1–10. https://doi.org/10.58406/jeb.v10i1.725
  24. Topadda, M. I., I Ketut Patra, & Rismawati. (2024). Analysis of the Leading and Non-Leading Sectors of South Sulawesi's Revenue Potential. International Student Conference on Business, Education, Economics, Accounting, and Management (ISC-BEAM), 2(1), 1945–1961. https://doi.org/10.21009/isc-beam.012.132
  25. Trisna, D., & Nadia. (2023). Analysis of Leading Sectors in West Kalimantan Province Based on the Klassen Method. Ecodestination, 1(2), 114–123. https://doi.org/10.59996/ekodestinasi.v1i2.82
  26. Yasir, A. (2021). Analysis Of Leading Sector Clusters In Increasing Gross Domestic Products In Sambas District. Journal of Eksyar, 08(1), 1–16. http://ejournal.staim-tulungagung.ac.id/index.php/

Similar Articles

<< < 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 > >> 

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.