Main Article Content

Abstract

The background of this study lies in the absence of specific regulations regarding bankruptcy and the suspension of debt payment obligations (PKPU) based on Sharia principles. In practice, the principles of business continuity and public interest (maṣlaḥah) are often neglected in resolving Sharia bankruptcy disputes, leading judges to focus primarily on formal juridical aspects. This research aims to analyze the implementation of these two principles in PKPU cases involving Sharia contracts, which the Commercial Court and the Supreme Court handle. The study employs a qualitative method with a normative legal approach through document studies and interviews. The results indicate that the principle of business continuity has not been optimally applied, while the principle of public interest is often overlooked in legal considerations. These findings underscore the need to reformulate Sharia bankruptcy law to incorporate maqāṣid al-syarī‘ah values better, thereby providing judges with a stronger foundation for balancing the interests of debtors, creditors, and society fairly and equitably.

Keywords

Bankruptcy and PKPU Decisions Business Continuity Public Interest (Mashlahah)

Article Details

How to Cite
Marsetiaji, M., Arif Khan, M. D., & Hidayat. (2025). The Principles of Business Continuity and Public Interest in the Resolution of Sharia Bankruptcy Disputes. Golden Ratio of Data in Summary, 6(1), 01–18. https://doi.org/10.52970/grdis.v6i1.1766

References

  1. Alam, N., Gupta, L., & Shanmugam, B. (2021). Islamic finance: Risk management challenges and solutions. Journal of Islamic Accounting and Business Research, 12(3), 456–472.
  2. Al-Fauzan, S. bin F. bin A. (2024). Al-Mulakhash al-Fiqhy. Kairo: Darul Aatsar.
  3. Al-Qurayshi, I. bin K. (2024). Tafsir Al-Qur’an Al-Azhim. Kairo: Maktabah As-Shofa.
  4. Al-Qurthuby, I. R. (2024). Bidayatul Mujtahid Wa Nihayatul Muqtashid (Cet. ke-1). Beirut: Dar Al-Kitab Al-Araby.
  5. Al-Sarraf. (2020). Bankruptcy reform in the Middle East and North Africa: Analyzing the new bankruptcy laws in the UAE, Saudi Arabia, Morocco, Egypt, and Bahrain. International Insolvency Review.
  6. Anggota DPR RI. (2024, August 12). https://www.dpr.go.id/anggota
  7. Aulia, N., & Ridwan, M. (2023). Insolvency test dalam perspektif hukum ekonomi syariah. Indonesian Journal of Islamic Law, 5(2), 145–159.
  8. Gaol, R. L., et al. (2021). Penerapan asas kelangsungan usaha atas debitor pailit dalam perkara kepailitan. To-Ra Jurnal Hukum: Hukum Untuk Mengatur dan Melindungi Masyarakat, 7(1).
  9. Hidayat, R. (2020). Jurisdiksi penyelesaian sengketa ekonomi syariah pasca putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi. Jurnal Hukum Islam, 18(1), 77–94.
  10. Iskandar, D. (2022). Prinsip going concern dalam penyelesaian kepailitan perusahaan di Indonesia. Jurnal Hukum dan Ekonomi, 14(2), 201–220.
  11. Johan, S. (2021). Separatist creditors' problems with the postponement of debt payment obligations, as per the Supreme Court's Decree No. 30/KMA/SK/I/2020. Journal Fiat Justisia, 15(3).
  12. Kusuma, A., & Hidayah, F. (2021). Comparative Study on Bankruptcy Law: Indonesia and Developed Countries. Indonesian Law Review, 11(3), 321–338.
  13. Ma’ruf, T. A. (2025). Analysis of Legal Protection of Copyright on Plagiarism of Artificial Intelligence Artworks. Golden Ratio of Law and Social Policy Review, 5(1), 01-09.
  14. Nugroho, L. D. (2021). Konstruksi Hukum Kepailitan Syari’ah di Indonesia (Cet. ke-1). Surabaya: Scopindo Media Pustaka.
  15. Nugroho, S. A. (2020). Hukum Kepailitan di Indonesia (Dalam Teori dan Praktek Serta Penerapan Hukumnya). Jakarta: Prenada Media.
  16. Pahsyah, H. (2023). Rekonstruksi regulasi kepailitan dan penundaan kewajiban pembayaran utang berbasis nilai hukum Islam [Disertasi, Universitas Islam Sultan Agung].
  17. Pratiwi, K., & Yopan, M. (2025). The Role of Accountability and Transparency in Advancing Meritocracy in the Selection of State Officials. Golden Ratio of Law and Social Policy Review, 5(1), 10–19.
  18. Putri, S., & Mulyadi, R. (2022). Living law dan peran hakim dalam penyelesaian sengketa ekonomi syariah. Journal Sosio-Religia, 20(2), 133–147.
  19. Rahmawati, I., & Setiawan, B. (2022). Rekonstruksi penyelesaian sengketa kepailitan syariah. Al-Iqtishad: Journal of Islamic Economics, 14(1), 45–62.
  20. Ramadhani, L., Prasetyo, A., & Sari, D. (2021). Analisis asas kelangsungan usaha dalam hukum kepailitan di Indonesia. Jurnal Ilmu Hukum, 9(2), 87–102.
  21. Ridwan, A., Khotimah, U. K., & Hidayat, H. (2024). Effects of Murâbahah Financing and Mudharabah Towards Customer Welfare: Case Study at Bank Syariah Indonesia KCP BSD South Tangerang. International Journal of Management Research and Economics, 2(3), 51-71.
  22. Rizqi, F. (2021). Penerapan hukum kepailitan pada akad syariah di Indonesia perspektif hukum ekonomi syariah dan legal certainty [Tesis, IAIN Batu Sangkar].
  23. Shari'ah Standard No. 43, Insolvency. (n.d.). AAOIFI. https://aaoifi.com/ss-43-insolvency/?lang=en
  24. Suadi, A. (2021). Hukum Kepailitan Syari’ah (Al Taflis) dalam Penyelesaiaan Sengketa Syariah. Jakarta: Kencana.
  25. Sunarmi, S. (2020). Prinsip Keseimbangan dalam Hukum Kepailitan di Indonesia (Edisi 2). Jakarta: PT. Sofmedia.
  26. Sutopo, W., Rakhmawati, I., & Nugroho, Y. (2023). The Growth and Challenges of Islamic Finance in Indonesia. Journal of Islamic Finance, 15(1), 23–39.
  27. Miqdad, M., Muhaimin, A. W., & Khan, D. A. (2025). Pengendalian Risiko dalam Akad Pembiayaan Murabahah dan Mudharabah pada Bank Pembiayaan Rakyat Syariah (BPRS) Madina Yogyakarta. Jurnal Riset Rumpun Ilmu Pendidikan, 4(2), 587-608.
  28. Yusuf, H., Adnan, A., & Firdaus, M. (2021). Strengthening the legal framework of Islamic bankruptcy law in Indonesia. International Journal of Law and Management, 63(6), 593–610.

Similar Articles

<< < 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 > >> 

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.