Article Sidebar

Download
Download Article

Main Article Content

Abstract

This study investigates the influence of local tax revenue and regional levies on local own-source revenue (PAD) in Banten Province during the 2019–2023 period. The objective is to determine whether these fiscal components, individually and collectively, strengthen the capacity of local governments to achieve greater financial independence. A quantitative research approach was applied using secondary data obtained from the official regional budget realization reports. Multiple linear regression analysis, supported by classical assumption tests, was conducted to examine the partial and simultaneous effects of the variables. The results reveal that local tax revenue has a positive and significant effect on local own-source revenue (p < 0.001), while regional levies have a positive but insignificant effect (p = 0.972). Simultaneously, both variables exert a significant joint influence on regional fiscal performance, explaining 63.5% of the variation in PAD (R² = 0.635). These findings support the principles of Fiscal Federalism Theory, which emphasize the role of fiscal decentralization in enhancing local revenue capacity. Practically, the results suggest that optimizing tax collection efficiency and reforming regional levy structures are essential strategies for improving fiscal independence and promoting sustainable regional development in Banten Province.

Keywords

Local Tax Revenue Regional Retribution Local Own-Source Revenue Fiscal Independence

Article Details

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

How to Cite
Rasyid, A., & Dewi, S. R. S. (2025). Impact of Local Tax Revenue and Regional Levies on Local Own Source Revenue in Banten Province (2019–2023). Golden Ratio of Data in Summary, 6(1), 31–44. https://doi.org/10.52970/grdis.v6i1.1689
Download Citation
Endnote/Zotero/Mendeley (RIS)
BibTeX

References

  1. Amanah, S., Fauziati, P., & Puttri, D. (2018). Pengaruh jumlah wajib pajak dan jumlah surat pemberitahuan terhadap penerimaan pajak penghasilan (Studi empiris pada KPP Pratama Bukittinggi periode 2014–2016). JSHP (Jurnal Sosial Humaniora dan Pendidikan), 2(1), 11–19. https://doi.org/10.32487/jshp.v2i1.285
  2. Baltagi, B. H. (2005). Econometric analysis of panel data (3rd ed.). John Wiley & Sons.
  3. Bird, R. M., & Zolt, E. M. (2020). Fiscal federalism and local government finance. In International Center for Public Policy Working Paper Series (Paper 20-03). Andrew Young School of Policy Studies.
  4. Dewi, S. R. S., Ruhiyat, E., & Suripto, S. (2024). Analisis meta-regresi pada penelitian corporate governance terhadap tax avoidance. Jurnal Akuntansi dan Bisnis Indonesia (JABISI), 5(1), 49–60.
  5. Gunawan, E. (2018). Pengaruh efektivitas penerimaan pajak daerah dan retribusi daerah terhadap pendapatan asli daerah Kabupaten Aceh Timur. Jurnal Ekonomi dan Manajemen Teknologi, 2(1), 1–54. http://journal.lembagakita.org/index.php/emt/article/view/52
  6. Hasannudin, & Wokas, H. (2014). Analisis efektivitas dan kontribusi pajak kendaraan bermotor terhadap penerimaan pendapatan asli daerah di Provinsi Maluku Utara. Accountability, 3(1), 56–65. https://doi.org/10.32400/ja.4941.3.1.2014.56-65
  7. Irwan, M. (2021). Efisiensi dan efektivitas penerimaan pendapatan asli daerah Kabupaten Banggai. Jurnal Sinar Manajemen, 8(2), 90–97. https://doi.org/10.56338/jsm.v8i2.1643
  8. Kartika, D. K. (2015). Analisis rasio kemandirian, rasio efektivitas PAD, dan rasio efisiensi PAD pada laporan realisasi APBD Kabupaten Sukabumi. Jurnal Akunida, 1(2), 23–34.
  9. Marlin, E., & Pratiwi, W. (2021). Analisis kontribusi pajak daerah dan retribusi daerah terhadap pendapatan asli daerah Kabupaten Bungo. Jurnal Administrasi Sosial dan Humaniora, 4(3), 122–129. https://doi.org/10.56957/jsr.v4i3.186
  10. Nainggolan, E. P. (2022). Pajak bumi dan bangunan dalam perspektif peningkatan pendapatan asli daerah Kota Medan. Balance: Jurnal Akuntansi dan Manajemen, 1(1), 1–6. https://doi.org/10.59086/jam.v1i1.1
  11. Panjaitan, H., & Sahara, D. (2017). Penerimaan pajak dan retribusi daerah terhadap peningkatan pendapatan asli daerah. Jurnal Akuntansi dan Keuangan Daerah, 12(2), 77–90.
  12. Priyatno, D. (2014). Teknik mudah dan cepat melakukan analisis data penelitian dengan SPSS. Gava Media.
  13. Purba, A. R. (2022). Analisis pendapatan asli daerah terhadap kinerja keuangan Kabupaten Banyuasin. Remik, 6(4), 1004–1012. https://doi.org/10.33395/remik.v6i4.11905
  14. Rakhmadhani, V. (2020). Pengaruh tingkat kepatuhan wajib pajak terhadap penerimaan pajak. Ekonam: Jurnal Ekonomi, Akuntansi & Manajemen, 2(1), 12–18. https://doi.org/10.37577/ekonam.v2i1.202
  15. Rizki, M. F., Ameraldo, F., & Nugroho, R. A. (2023). Pelatihan pajak untuk UMKM dan e-pajak SMK 2 Mei Kabupaten Pringsewu. Journal of Engineering and Information Technology for Community Service, 1(4), 256–260. http://jurnal.teknokrat.ac.id/index.php/JEIT-CS/article/view/257
  16. Sidik, M. (2002). Desentralisasi fiskal dan keuangan daerah dalam otonomi daerah. Gramedia Pustaka Utama.
  17. Sugiyono. (2018). Metode penelitian kuantitatif, kualitatif, dan R&D. Alfabeta.
  18. Utami, T. (2021). Pengaruh efektivitas penerimaan pajak daerah dan retribusi daerah terhadap pendapatan asli daerah Kota Medan [Undergraduate thesis, Universitas Medan Area].
  19. Wibowo, T., & Nuraini, D. (2022). Pengaruh pajak daerah dan retribusi terhadap PAD Provinsi Jawa Tengah. Jurnal Ilmiah Akuntansi dan Keuangan, 9(1), 34–42.
  20. Widhi, A., & Prasetyo, Z. (2016). Metode penelitian kuantitatif. Zifatama Publishing.
  21. Yakub, H., Wijaya, A., & Effendi, A. S. (2022). Analisis efektivitas dan efisiensi pajak daerah serta retribusi daerah dan kontribusinya terhadap pendapatan asli daerah. Kinerja, 19(1), 15–28. https://doi.org/10.30872/jkin.v19i1.10789.

Similar Articles

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 > >> 

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.