Article Sidebar

Download
Download Article

Main Article Content

Abstract

This study examines the role of Natural Capital Accounting (NCA) as a strategic instrument for biodiversity preservation within resource-intensive firms, a sector characterized by significant ecological dependencies and impacts. The research aims to evaluate how NCA reshapes corporate governance, supports ecological risk management, and enhances biodiversity-related decision-making processes. Employing a qualitative research design through a systematic literature study, the analysis synthesizes theoretical contributions and empirical evidence from interdisciplinary scholarship in environmental accounting, ecological economics, and sustainability management. The methodological approach includes thematic content analysis of peer-reviewed studies, institutional reports, and contemporary policy frameworks to identify patterns in NCA implementation, operational challenges, and biodiversity outcomes. The findings reveal that firms adopting NCA meaningfully integrate ecological considerations into strategic planning, risk assessment, and performance evaluation, demonstrating clearer pathways toward biodiversity stewardship. However, the study also identifies significant methodological limitations, including data gaps, valuation complexities, and organizational constraints that hinder effective application. The results underscore that NCA contributes positively to biodiversity preservation when supported by strong governance structures, robust ecological data, and institutional commitment. The study concludes that NCA has considerable potential as a transformative sustainability tool, offering theoretical insights into multi-capital accounting and practical implications for aligning corporate operations with global biodiversity objectives.

Keywords

Natural Capital Accounting Biodiversity Preservation Resource-Intensive Firms Sustainability Governance Ecological Economics

Article Details

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

How to Cite
Nochh, M. Y. (2025). Natural Capital Accounting as a Strategic Tool for Biodiversity Preservation in Resource-Intensive Firms. Golden Ratio of Community Services and Dedication, 6(1), 44–58. https://doi.org/10.52970/grcsd.v6i1.1941
Download Citation
Endnote/Zotero/Mendeley (RIS)
BibTeX

References

  1. Argüello, J. (2022). Ecosystem natural capital accounting: The landscape approach. Conservation Science and Practice, 4(2), e1261. https://doi.org/10.1111/csp2.1261
  2. Barker, T. (2019). Natural capital and corporate environmental performance: Emerging perspectives. Journal of Environmental Management, 243, 45–55. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2019.04.123
  3. Barbier, E. B. (2022). Policy implications of the Dasgupta Review: Land use change and biodiversity. Environmental and Resource Economics, 83(4), 911–935. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10640-022-00658-1
  4. Beltramello, A., Martin, J., & Caruso, G. (2023). Barriers to implementing natural capital accounting in corporate systems. Journal of Cleaner Production, 412, 137002. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2023.137002
  5. Dasgupta, P. (2021). The Economics of Biodiversity: The Dasgupta Review. HM Treasury. https://doi.org/10.2458/jpe.2289
  6. Deutz, S., Gorman, M., & Lynch, K. (2021). Biodiversity and ecosystem valuation challenges in natural capital accounting. Ecological Indicators, 133, 108388. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolind.2021.108388
  7. Fleming, A., Ogilvy, S., Horner, C., & O’Grady, A. P. (2024). Designing natural capital accounting for agriculture: Perceptions of farm accountants. Sustainability Accounting, Management and Policy Journal, 15(7), 85–108. https://doi.org/10.1108/SAMPJ-07-2023-1234
  8. García-López, M. J. (2024). Mapping research on natural capital accounting. Business and Society Review, 14(2), 28–42. https://doi.org/10.3390/jrfm14020028
  9. Grover, I., Suitor, S., & O’Reilly-Wapstra, J. (2025). Adoption of natural capital accounting in forestry: Lessons from Tasmanian primary industries. Forest Policy and Economics, 158, 103123. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.forpol.2024.103123
  10. Gupta, S., & Mason, C. (2020). Natural capital, biodiversity, and strategic resource dependence. Journal of Sustainable Business, 12(1), 44–62. https://doi.org/10.1016/jsb.2020.02.005
  11. Haque, F., & Jones, M. J. (2020). Corporate biodiversity disclosures and board gender diversity. British Accounting Review, 52(2), 100893. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bar.2020.100893
  12. Hassan, A. M., Roberts, L., & Atkins, J. (2020). Factors influencing extinction disclosures: Corporate motivations for biodiversity reporting. Business Strategy and the Environment, 29(3), 1419–1436. https://doi.org/10.1002/bse.2442
  13. Ingram, J., Bagstad, K., Hein, L., & Ruijs, A. (2022). Accounting for natural capital in decision-making: Public and private perspectives. Ecological Economics, 190, 107259. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2021.107259
  14. Jones, M., Carver, L., & Stoddard, R. (2020). Natural capital in mining: Applications and challenges. Resources Policy, 68, 101730. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resourpol.2020.101730
  15. Khan, N., Thomas, G., & El-Deen, S. (2023). Natural capital transparency and ESG integration in resource-intensive sectors. Journal of Environmental Management, 331, 117256. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2023.117256
  16. Kumar, A., Singh, D., & Rao, P. (2020). Biodiversity risk, ecological accounting, and corporate environmental behaviour. Ecological Economics, 177, 106778. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2020.106778
  17. Mace, G. M., Barrett, M., & Burgess, N. (2022). Biodiversity measurement for corporate natural capital accounting. Conservation Biology, 36(4), e13987. https://doi.org/10.1111/cobi.13987
  18. Reed, D., Fraser, E., & Nyberg, A. (2021). Symbolic versus substantive adoption of natural capital accounting. Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal, 34(6), 1204–1233. https://doi.org/10.1108/AAAJ-10-2020-4990
  19. Smith, C. L. (2021). Review of The Economics of Biodiversity: The Dasgupta Review. Biological Conservation, 264, 109395. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biocon.109395
  20. TNFD. (2023). Biodiversity Footprinting Approaches for Financial Institutions: Technical Discussion Paper. Taskforce on Nature-related Financial Disclosures.
  21. Vardon, M., Keith, H., Burnett, P., & Lindenmayer, D. (2022). Natural capital accounting and ecosystem condition: Implications for policy and corporate practice. Ecological Economics, 204, 107615. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2022.107615

Similar Articles

<< < 1 2 3 4 

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.