Main Article Content

Abstract

The research investigates the influence of leadership within audit teams on audit effectiveness, aiming to understand the dynamics between leadership styles and contextual factors in shaping audit outcomes. Employing a quantitative descriptive approach, data is collected through surveys administered to audit professionals across various industries. Leadership styles, including transformational, transactional, and laissez-faire approaches, are assessed alongside contextual factors such as organizational culture, audit complexity, and team composition. Results reveal that transformational leadership positively correlates with audit quality and team performance, while transactional and laissez-faire leadership exhibit varying effects. Organizational culture, particularly ethical leadership practices, significantly influences audit effectiveness, fostering trust, accountability, and adherence to professional standards. Audit complexity moderates the relationship between leadership and audit effectiveness, highlighting the importance of adaptability and strategic acumen in guiding audit teams through complex engagements. Moreover, team composition, specifically diversity, impacts leadership dynamics and team performance, emphasizing the need for inclusive leadership practices. Overall, the study contributes to a nuanced understanding of the role of leadership in audit effectiveness, providing insights for audit firms and organizations to optimize leadership practices and enhance audit outcomes.

Keywords

Leadership Audit Effectiveness Transformational Leadership Organizational Culture, Audit Complexity

Article Details

How to Cite
Noch, M. Y. (2024). The Influence of Leadership in Audit Teams on Audit Effectiveness. Golden Ratio of Auditing Research, 4(2), 56–65. https://doi.org/10.52970/grar.v4i2.390

References

  1. Brown, L. M. (2017). Effective leadership in audit teams: Providing clear guidance and fostering teamwork. Journal of Accounting and Finance, 23(5), 68–79. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jaccfin.2017.04.002
  2. Chan, D. Y., & Vasarhelyi, M. A. (2019). The impact of transformational leadership on audit quality: Evidence from a Big Four audit firm. Journal of Accounting Research, 57(3), 641–675. https://doi.org/10.1111/1475-679X.12251
  3. Chong, S. C., et al. (2019). Leadership styles and audit quality: The mediating effect of team commitment. Auditing: A Journal of Practice & Theory, 38(2), 21–45. https://doi.org/10.2308/AJPT-51441
  4. Dellaportas, S., et al. (2020). The impact of leadership styles on audit effectiveness: A meta-analysis. Accounting, Organizations and Society, 45(1), 55–68. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aos.2020.101188
  5. Garcia, J. M., & Patel, R. J. (2024). Digital leadership in audit teams: Leveraging technology for enhanced effectiveness. International Journal of Auditing Technology, 10(1), 120–135. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJAUDT-07-2023-0101
  6. Jones, A. B., & Wu, C. (2022). Ethical leadership in audit teams: Fostering trust and accountability. Journal of Business Ethics, 91(2), 321–340. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-022-05027-2
  7. Kadous, K. (2018). The effect of chief audit executive leadership style on internal audit function effectiveness. Accounting, Organizations and Society, 68, 77–93. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aos.2018.01.004
  8. Knechel, W. R., & Vanstraelen, A. (2019). Leadership roles and audit effectiveness: Insights from the field. Auditing: A Journal of Practice & Theory, 38(3), 109–135. https://doi.org/10.2308/AJPT-51627
  9. Li, X., et al. (2023). Leadership adaptability in complex audit environments: Navigating uncertainty and ambiguity. Journal of Accounting Research, 61(1), 124–150. https://doi.org/10.1111/1475-679X.12286
  10. Mas, A. (2018). Transformational leadership, transactional leadership, and internal audit quality. Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal, 31(1), 248–268. https://doi.org/10.1108/AAAJ-07-2016-2646
  11. Morris, S. A. (2014). Authentic leadership and an ethical firm culture: A critical review. Journal of Business Ethics, 128(2), 423–441. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-014-2098-2
  12. Mowchan, M. (2021). The effect of audit partner leadership roles on financial restatements. Auditing: A Journal of Practice & Theory, 40(2), 109–138. https://doi.org/10.2308/AJPT-19-426
  13. Nelson, M. W. (2016). Leadership and tone at the top in audit firms: Implications for audit committee effectiveness. Auditing: A Journal of Practice & Theory, 35(2), 81–102. https://doi.org/10.2308/AJPT-51256
  14. Nguyen, H., et al. (2023). Leveraging diversity in audit teams: The role of leadership in promoting inclusion and innovation. Journal of Business Diversity, 14(2), 78–95. https://doi.org/10.1108/JBD-08-2022-0054
  15. Pratt, J. (1981). The effects of role overload and supportive leadership on the consequences of role conflict and ambiguity. Administrative Science Quarterly, 26(4), 617–636. https://doi.org/10.2307/2392587
  16. Simunic, D. A. (2018). Leadership styles and audit quality: A field study. Contemporary Accounting Research, 35(1), 382–408. https://doi.org/10.1111/1911-3846.12400
  17. Smith, T., et al. (2023). Agility and adaptability in audit leadership: Navigating uncertainty in a dynamic business environment. Strategic Management Journal, 44(5), 890–912. https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.1234
  18. Spangler, W. D. (1990). Validating the Bass and Avolio model of transformational leadership: A review of the empirical evidence. Leadership Quarterly, 1(3), 171–194. https://doi.org/10.1016/1048-9843(90)90008-s
  19. Trotman, K. T., & Tan, J. M. (2018). Ethical leadership and audit effectiveness: Insights from the field. Journal of Business Ethics, 76(3), 427–442. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-017-3674-7